Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hlthe2b

(111,514 posts)

1. Paid "experts" have always been problematic and warrant a "jaundiced" eye...

Reply to lostincalifornia (Original post)

Wed Sep 24, 2025, 08:11 AM

Wednesday

But this judge got to the heart of the matter. Good on her. And Harvard? Good gawd. This guy has no business engaging in such a conflict of interest. Give him the boot!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump's Tylenol warning cited a Harvard dean's research. But a judge called his shifting conclusions 'unreliable' [View all] lostincalifornia Wednesday OP

Paid "experts" have always been problematic and warrant a "jaundiced" eye... hlthe2b Wednesday #1