Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tulipsandroses

(7,964 posts)
30. That's my point. That these affiliates may end up regretting not showing Kimmel. People will find it elsewhere.
Wed Sep 24, 2025, 07:50 AM
Wednesday

That may change viewer habits. Once people realize that they can watch it in other ways, that may change their viewing habits, and not just for Kimmel. So they may end up losing viewers for other shows, thus losing advertising dollars for shows they never intended to lose.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I don't think it will matter in the end newdeal2 Monday #1
Eventually they will cave and return, or lose their affiliation. Maru Kitteh Monday #4
The FCC rules give stations very broad rights to preempt network content onenote Monday #17
Well good luck selling BigMacs if McDonald's won't sell you the patties. Maru Kitteh Monday #21
Actually, affiliates are allowed by law to preempt network programming -- no limit on number of hours onenote Tuesday #23
How do they make money ? JI7 Monday #2
Disney (ABC) is the content generator (producer) of Kimmel, so Sinclair pays Disney Bernardo de La Paz Monday #5
So they make money based on viewers ? JI7 Monday #7
Utimately & originally. Eyeballs are product advertisers buy fr stations, so stations need eyeball bait for eyeball trap Bernardo de La Paz Monday #10
The FCC's rules limit such contract terms. onenote Monday #20
Thanks for clarifying that. . . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Tuesday #22
Sinclair is about to get a lesson in how (un)popular news is with late night viewers Bernardo de La Paz Monday #3
The multi-decade, multi-trillion dollar effort to buy up and control American Media is now paying off. maxsolomon Monday #6
Heard sinclair is mostly in red areas, sorry conservative areas anyway so who cares. Oooops... a kennedy Monday #8
Seattle and Portland are stuck with Sinclair ABC stations. Sneederbunk Monday #12
And DC n/t SickOfTheOnePct Monday #19
Sinclair living up to their end of the bargain ... berniesandersmittens Monday #9
Their audience will see it on streaming apps Johonny Monday #11
Where is the best place to watch it live? Baitball Blogger Monday #13
Kimmel is available on YouTube daily for free Jacoby365 Monday #14
Little known FCC reg about affiliates not running this show or that. Liberal In Texas Monday #15
The problem is illustrated in the DC market. onenote Tuesday #24
You are so right. Liberal In Texas Wednesday #25
I don't get Sinclair where I live in Ohio...the day I do, news is gone. Demsrule86 Monday #16
Hopefully they'll lose advertising dollars. Emile Monday #18
Last night when I went to bed, 700K people had streamed Kimmel on Youtube - that was in less than an hour after it aired tulipsandroses Wednesday #26
love Zappa references! :) samnsara Wednesday #28
But streaming doesn't give them the profits they get on tv mucifer Wednesday #29
That's my point. That these affiliates may end up regretting not showing Kimmel. People will find it elsewhere. tulipsandroses Wednesday #30
YouTube is where I watched it and was linked FarPoint Wednesday #32
KOMO in Seattle didnt air it. samnsara Wednesday #27
I don't know how to boycott Sinclair..... FarPoint Wednesday #31
Netstar won't broadcast it either. spanone Wednesday #33
Many big "Blue" city stations amongst their holdings Cattledog Wednesday #34
Boycott All Sinclair Station Advertisers.. MrWowWow Wednesday #35
Nexstar carried a Suits rerun here. nt doc03 Wednesday #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Sinclair Won't Air Jimmy ...»Reply #30