General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I've finally come around on secession [View all]cachukis
(3,450 posts)matters.
What is more practical is managing infrastructure.
The west coast states are for the most part ideologically aligned. With a high speed rail system they will be linked more structurally in alliance.
The same could be said for the Northeast as far south as D.C. Charlotte and the triangle might want to connect.
The southeast has the SEC which should be enough to align it.
The Midwest has Chicago as its hub and Ohio will have to make a decision, economically.
I suspect these alliances already exist with trucking routes, electric grids, and factors with which I am unaware.
If any of you remember the slime experiments hunting oatmeal in a labyrinth, you can see how transportation links are critical connections.
We rely so often, economically, on the varieties of each region's strengths, fair trade zones will be established similarly to relations in the global marketplace.
Military maintenance will be the most difficult issue, but I sense giving up that national strength would maintain a structured unification.
I don't think we can continue the ideological rift as is.
I live in Florida with many like minded thinkers.
Yet it is a backward managed political juggernaut.
It is filling with republicans/ trumpers while a serious brain drain is moving to other areas.
I imagine this is happening elsewhere.
With economics a major factor on people's ability to live their dreams, migration in America will respond to conditions that satisfy happiness goals.
People most settled will stay put, but demographic changes are already afoot.
Edit history
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):