Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

AZJonnie

(1,642 posts)

1. I'm sure they're all terrible nominees, however "nominees keep having" clearly implies "more than one nominee"

Reply to In It to Win It (Original post)

Mon Sep 22, 2025, 04:00 PM

Monday

Yet the article names only one nominee who had trouble answering the question, Mascott.

Something to know if you decide to share this article elsewhere. The byline appears click-baity. The fact that this person refused to answer the question is still notable, but article only supports the claim for one nominee

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

For Trump's Latest Judicial Nominees, Trump Is a Law Unto Himself - Balls and Strikes [View all] In It to Win It Monday OP

I'm sure they're all terrible nominees, however "nominees keep having" clearly implies "more than one nominee" AZJonnie Monday #1