Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

vanlassie

(6,146 posts)

3. I agree. His posturing "He was like a son to me!"

Reply to intrepidity (Original post)

Mon Sep 22, 2025, 03:09 PM

Monday

was enough for me to question his “involvement.” He is not in the habit of mourning anybody- I only recall one other time. It was when he tried to look like a person who gave a damn when he bombed a Syrian airfield after saying:
“When you kill innocent children — innocent babies, babies, little babies — with a chemical gas that is so lethal … that crosses many, many lines. … Even beautiful babies were cruelly murdered in this very barbaric attack.”
Sadly I could believe he would order a strike on ANYBODY if he thought he could benefit.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Attilatheblond Zackzzzz

7 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

You know the old saying: "Who benefits?" [View all] intrepidity Monday OP

Aesop asked, who will bell the cat? taxi Monday #1

It's the "stochastic" part of stochastic terrorism. TommyT139 Monday #2

I agree. His posturing "He was like a son to me!" vanlassie Monday #3

Perhaps when his mind has completely collapsed we'll get his Lady MacBeth intrepidity Monday #5

I think they have been waiting for a moment johnnyfins Monday #4

I think Kirk drew the short straw Bayard Monday #7

We keep asking that question, don't we? yellow dahlia Monday #6