Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lapucelle

(20,750 posts)
25. A quorum was not present.
Sun Sep 21, 2025, 08:08 PM
Sep 21

That means that either all of the Democrats and some of the Republicans were not in the chamber or that some Democrats and some Republicans were not there. Either way, at least 51 senators appear to have skipped the shit show.

Senate rules presume a quorum in legislative session. In other words, "we do have a quorum" is the default setting.

The roll gets called only if a senator "suggests the absence of quorum".

If a motion to rescind the quorum call (stop the roll call) is passed by unanimous consent, the issue of a quorum goes back to its default setting, i.e. the presumption of a quorum.

-----------------------------------

- Scott (R) ("notwithstanding rule XXII" ) was careful not to invoke cloture.

- At the end of his ridiculous speech, Tuberville (R), suggested the absence of a quorum, and a roll call was ordered and initiated

- The roll call was stopped when Lankford (R) asked for unanimous consent for the quorum call to be rescinded.

---------------------------------------------

The resolution itself was "approved" by a voice vote of those present in the chamber.

------------------------------------------------

From the Congressional Record:

Mr. SCOTT of Florida: Mr. President, as if in legislative session and notwithstanding rule XXII, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the consideration of S. Res. 403, which was submitted earlier today.

snip-------------------------------------------

Mr. Tuberville: I suggest the absence of a quorum.

The PRESIDING OFFICER: The clerk will call the roll.
The senior assistant executive clerk proceeded to call the roll.

Mr. LANKFORD: Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.

The PRESIDING OFFICER (Mr.MORENO): Without objection, it is so ordered

https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/volume-171/issue-153/senate-section/article/S6713-1

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This message was self-deleted by its author drray23 Sep 19 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author drray23 Sep 19 #2
From what I can see, there was not a full senate vote questionseverything Sep 19 #3
I think ABC and other MSM headlines are intentionally putting up misleading headlines, trying to represent lostincalifornia Sep 19 #7
They only need 51 present for a quorum to take a voice vote Fiendish Thingy Sep 19 #4
Either walked or weren't paying attention, but It is very unlikely that in a formal vote you would have Senate lostincalifornia Sep 19 #8
A quorum was not present. lapucelle Sep 21 #25
Thank you, lostincalifornia. sheshe2 Sep 19 #5
It just that there seems to be so many outlets pushing a misleading narrative. I think it is prudent that we lostincalifornia Sep 19 #12
I did a quick search before responding. sheshe2 Sep 19 #16
More Info: TheProle Sep 19 #6
Thank-you. A misleading headline from many of the MSM "news" outlets. lostincalifornia Sep 19 #9
The country's lost its goddamn mind. TheProle Sep 19 #10
and I don't think Antipsychotics will solve the problem, or maybe that is the problem, too many are already on them. lostincalifornia Sep 19 #13
Thank You, The Prole! Cha Sep 19 #20
It was just a Republican stunt. Quiet Em Sep 19 #11
I think so, and from what I am observing a lot of the MSM don't mind pushing the misleading headline that lostincalifornia Sep 19 #14
They've been extremely misleading Quiet Em Sep 19 #17
Of course, the m$$$m Doesn't mind getting it Cha Sep 19 #22
Thanks Cha. lostincalifornia Sep 19 #23
You're Welcome, Cha Sep 20 #24
Thank you for explaining kavotheclown Sep 19 #15
Thanks for this mcar Sep 19 #18
It passed by unanimous consent. Wiz Imp Sep 19 #19
TY for bringing this up. Given the tally in the House I have also found the Senate claim baffling. Hekate Sep 19 #21
The bottom line is that there was no tally in the Senate because a quorum wasn't present. lapucelle Sep 21 #26
Kick nt Justice matters. Sep 21 #27
There is no tally. The resolution was "approved" by a voice vote of those present. There was no quorum. lapucelle Sep 21 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There have been several O...»Reply #25