Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: US Senate UNANIMOUSLY passes Remembrance Day Oct 14th for Kirk [View all]Wiz Imp
(7,520 posts)188. The House did NOT vote on the day of remembrance for Charlie Kirk.
(BTW, it's not Charlie Kirk day - it's a single day not permanent since resolutions like this have o force of law behind them. It's strictly performative - pretty much meaningless in the grand scheme of things). Only the Senate introduced the resolution for the day of remembrance and they did it by calling for unanimous consent while no Democrats were present, or the Democrats otherwise walked out).
The House vote referenced is the vote for the resolution "honoring" Charlie Kirk. Again, non-binding, performative, and pretty much meaningless, but a no vote by some Democrats can and will be attempted to be weaponized against them in next year's elections.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
277 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

It makes our party look weak and submissive. I'm not sure that voters find those traits appealing.
Crunchy Frog
Sep 19
#53
Make it a national holiday already - and don't forget to erect a statue for the dead troll
dalton99a
Sep 19
#3
For me, he looks like a Terry Gilliam animation from Monty Python's Flying Circus
Montauk6
Sep 21
#275
I guess no one wanted to stick their neck out and object given the climate around this shooting. It's like 9/11 all over
LymphocyteLover
Sep 19
#112
That's because no Democrats were in the Chamber when the call for unanimous consent was made.
Wiz Imp
Sep 19
#186
Why do you think the Senate is prohibited from passing legislation by unanimous consent?
tritsofme
Sep 20
#269
That's not what I said. What I said is they can't pass legislation with only a handful of people
Wiz Imp
Sep 20
#272
Fun fact: Schumer's use of a blanket hold on unanimous consent was what slowed confirmation
lapucelle
Sep 20
#274
"It is bad to be oppressed by a minority, but it is worse to be oppressed by a majority." Lord Acton
Ping Tung
Sep 19
#7
Well, poodles got to poodle. The poodles should write a how to book on how to not inspire people to show up and vote.nt
ImNotGod
Sep 19
#8
No can do. I'll be busy celebrating the Rocky Horror Picture Show's 50th anniversary.
Heidi
Sep 19
#9
Wonderful. Can we have a day of remembrance for Charlie Manson, too? Standards are gone.
Vinca
Sep 19
#12
You keep saying, no democrats were present or walked out... do you have a link to support that?
questionseverything
Sep 20
#221
Finding no evidence they were there is very different from proving they weren't there
questionseverything
Sep 20
#237
Have you changed from no dems to "two California democrats weren't aware "
questionseverything
Sep 20
#242
Cloture was not invoked, and there was no quorum. At least 50 senators were not in the chamber.
lapucelle
Sep 20
#241
Meanwhile, there are folks roasting Democrats based on inaccurate, right-wing rage bait. N/T
lapucelle
Sep 20
#247
Congress encompasses both the House and the Senate. It doesn't just mean the House of Representatives.
Vinca
Sep 20
#224
Or at least to be balanced, rememberance day for George Floyd AND the other one.
flor-de-jasmim
Sep 19
#15
That is essentially what happened. No one actually cast a vote for the resolution, it passed by unanimous consent
tritsofme
Sep 19
#81
WTF? As a Canadian, I am absolutely disgusted by this move from democrats in the senate.
Bev54
Sep 19
#40
The perfect day to remind everyone about what a hate-filled monster Charlie Kirk was.
Martin68
Sep 19
#41
She wasn't a promoter of bigotry and she didn't get a special, permanent day of remembrance.
Ocelot II
Sep 19
#137
Did it just condemn the political violence? Or was it also an exercise in hagiography?
Crunchy Frog
Sep 19
#187
The resolution for the day of remembrance was just to declare a one day day of remembrance
Wiz Imp
Sep 19
#200
OK, I've just seen multiple posts from people unaware that the House passed a resolution regarding Hortman weeks ago
MichMan
Sep 19
#104
I suggest you contact your representatives and tell them how angry you are with their vote then
MichMan
Sep 19
#142
When I was a kid, maybe fifth grade, someone had written "principal" when the correct word to use was "principle."
Xavier Breath
Sep 20
#252
We have to pick our battles & keeping Kirk in the headlines isn't helpful. FFS. And no this isn't like Pelosi's comment
themaguffin
Sep 19
#154
Pure politics. Meaningless crap. Hopefully it will divert attention from a racist pig back to
lostincalifornia
Sep 19
#76
I didn't say it was good. I just speculated what I thought their motivation was.
lostincalifornia
Sep 19
#93
I also question the accuracy of the OP. No way Sanders would have voted for this.
lostincalifornia
Sep 19
#160
At least 50 senators were not in the chamber when the call for unanimous consent went out.
lapucelle
Sep 20
#250
What "stunt"? At least 50 senators were not in the chamber when the motion for unanimous consent was called.
lapucelle
Sep 20
#249
I'm done - zero $$ to the Democratic Party from me. They don't have my back.
NoMoreRepugs
Sep 19
#79
Fuck that noise. I'll not be supporting an action that supports the false narrative about what kind of person Kirk was.
Solly Mack
Sep 19
#91
It is an annual? But it does seem to indicate where this nation is at this point in time.
LiberalArkie
Sep 19
#100
Theirs not to reason why, Theirs but to do and die: Into the valley of Death
twodogsbarking
Sep 19
#123
Good Lord! Two weeks ago 70% of the country couldn't have picked this guy out of a lineup.
rsdsharp
Sep 19
#124
A Democrat should have at least stood and recited Kirk's own words from the well of the Senate,
sop
Sep 19
#125
Right before the next No Kings Marches so left will be blamed for breaking the FAKE 'PEACE'
blm
Sep 19
#132
The headline is inaccurate rage bait, and the Economic Times is a right wing source
lapucelle
Sep 19
#133
Wait, do I still stand accused of *slandering* the the right-wing, fake news source?
lapucelle
Sep 19
#167
It appears that it's cowardly to call out right wing, fake news sources and the lies
lapucelle
Sep 20
#238
The OP cites the Economic Times, not the Financial Times. I corrected my headline.
lapucelle
Sep 19
#161
I stand accused of *slandering* the Economic Times for calling out the inaccuracy of its rage bait headline.
lapucelle
Sep 19
#169
To begin with, it was a resolution, not a bill, and no roll call vote was taken.
lapucelle
Sep 19
#152
It seems very unlikely. I doubt Sanders voted for this, and also other Senate Democrats also
lostincalifornia
Sep 19
#159
This will go down in the annals of history as being even more consequential than...
LudwigPastorius
Sep 19
#153
I assume they worked across the aisle day and night to get that landmark legislation passed
Bluetus
Sep 19
#175
Point of clarification. It's an abomination, but its not a law and its not permanent.
onenote
Sep 19
#173
Senate Democrats did not vote unanimously for the Republican's Charlie Kirk Day stunt
Quiet Em
Sep 19
#177
Celebrate Remberance Day for the One and Only. Orange Asshole Day on June 14th, too.
Donman
Sep 20
#257
Hope we can take this off our calendars later. I would hate to have to look at this very year.
flying_wahini
Sep 21
#276