Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

DavidDvorkin

(20,314 posts)

9. I think it does

Reply to Miles Archer (Reply #6)

Sat Aug 23, 2025, 01:26 PM

Saturday

He's ordering members of the Executive Branch to commit certain acts, while acting in his official capacity.

The vagueness of the SC decision makes it even more dangerous.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

"Someone should explain to Trump that when ICE starts murdering civilians on his request, he will be criminally liable" [View all] Miles Archer Saturday OP

I'm pretty sure shithole thinks he....., Lovie777 Saturday #1

As does the SC, evidently. Ferrets are Cool Saturday #2

I wish I could still believe that. (nt) Paladin Saturday #3

Why would the SC's immunity ruling not apply in this case, too? DavidDvorkin Saturday #4

It's supposed to cover "official acts in his role as president" Miles Archer Saturday #6

I think it does DavidDvorkin Saturday #9

True...it was deliberately left open-ended so that Trump could DEFINE "official acts." Miles Archer Saturday #10

Kent State Massacre MrWowWow Saturday #5

Hell, just four years later Jim Rhodes was rewarded with another term as governor. Xavier Breath Saturday #7

And not much has changed in the decades... Wuddles440 Saturday #8

Trump's seen his doctor's reports Johonny Saturday #11