Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

W_HAMILTON

(9,562 posts)
9. I'm in a profession acutely aware of what would happen if this were to be implemented.
Fri Aug 1, 2025, 01:24 AM
Aug 1

More and more wealthy people would buy up properties, convert them to short-term rentals (like Airbnbs) and take accelerated bonus depreciation on them, allowing them to report big losses that offset taxable income in the early years; then they sell their existing home, using the exclusion mentioned here to wipe out most of the taxable gains, then move into the rental home and use that as their primary residence. They buy another property to turn into a short-term rental, following the same process as before. Once their new primary residence/old short-term rental qualifies for the exclusion mentioned here, they sell it and rinse and repeat. The bonus depreciation taken on the short-term rental that you would normally have to pay back in terms of taxable gain when you sell the property will then be mostly eaten up by the exclusion mentioned here.

In short, people with the means to do so will own more homes than they otherwise would -- thus reducing supply even further -- and when they do sell those properties, they won't have to pay much (if any) tax on the gains -- thus making the rich even richer and exacerbating income inequality.

This absolute is yet another gift to the wealthier among us and absolutely will not help the housing market issues we are currently experiencing.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh great, as if he wasn't already causing a recession Metaphorical Jul 31 #1
You seem to be misreading the proposal Ms. Toad Jul 31 #2
Thanks for this, MT. The detail of having to live in a house for two years... brush Aug 2 #26
Making it more lucrative for long time homeowners to sell would benefit anyone wanting to buy DBoon Jul 31 #3
I agree Dave says Aug 1 #10
you're assuming a couple. mopinko Aug 1 #14
Most people don't have much Dave says Aug 1 #16
for most ppl, their homes r their biggest investment. mopinko Aug 1 #18
Median house value is $410.8k Dave says Aug 2 #19
that's how it used to b. mopinko Jul 31 #4
Capital gains tops out at 20%, not 39% tinrobot Aug 1 #7
ty. i forgot about that. mopinko Aug 1 #11
The heirs wouldn't pay on capital gains Dave says Aug 2 #20
I support. We need turnover on the housing market Melon Aug 1 #5
It only matters if the gain exceeds $500/250k Dave says Aug 2 #21
That's not true. Any $250k house in in 2016 Melon Aug 2 #24
What's not true? Dave says Aug 2 #25
The lack of affordable housing has continued to moniss Aug 1 #6
Basically, this would give big tax breaks to rich people tinrobot Aug 1 #8
a cap is fine, but housing prices in a lot of places r well above that. mopinko Aug 1 #12
I agree, the limits were set in the Clinton era and never adjusted tinrobot Aug 1 #15
They weren't indexed but they were adjusted Dave says Aug 2 #22
I'm in a profession acutely aware of what would happen if this were to be implemented. W_HAMILTON Aug 1 #9
you're assuming they cd use it over and over. mopinko Aug 1 #13
Not correct Dave says Aug 2 #23
Can we please get these fucking idiots out of our government now? Initech Aug 1 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Trump wants to 'unleash' ...»Reply #9