Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

elocs

(24,486 posts)
83. The "survival of the planet"? The Earth is not "alive" but has living things on it that can die.
Sat May 31, 2025, 07:44 AM
May 31

The Earth is just a rock in space that could be destroyed from its planet form, but it cannot "die" in the sense that we know death.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Isn't that why Trump and co. want to pay women to have babies? ananda May 29 #1
Yes, but if you read the interview, you see that it's a real problem. nt LAS14 May 29 #5
I do see that. ananda May 29 #15
No, it isn't. Why are you falling for right-wing bullshit? valleyrogue May 29 #24
Douthat is NYT's token republican right winger. defacto7 May 30 #79
I can't get into the article. Why is it a problem? yardwork May 31 #93
Pay white women to have babies. White women. mucholderthandirt May 30 #74
Well, I'd appreciate it if they'd pay me for giving birth to twins Crunchy Frog May 30 #78
That's an interesting take. ananda May 31 #105
Only white women. They want to keep whites as the majority. kerry-is-my-prez May 31 #100
Exactly! ananda May 31 #104
The Earth might breathe a sigh of relief? flvegan May 29 #2
Right. The earth is way too overpopulated now. raccoon May 29 #6
The earth might, but if you read the interview, you'll get the idea that humanity might not. nt LAS14 May 29 #7
i'm cool with that...if the other species get to survive. ret5hd May 30 #26
We're really going to go full Handmaids Tale on DU behind forced-birther Douthat's column? Prairie Gates May 29 #3
People can't afford to have children pcdb May 29 #17
Why is that scary? LearnedHand May 29 #4
Too little population to support civilization. Read the article. nt LAS14 May 29 #8
So, when did human civilization first begin, Crunchy Frog May 30 #29
Long time ago and when there wasn't a policy system of younger people supporting older people uponit7771 May 30 #31
The issue is our economy is built around growth EdmondDantes_ May 30 #33
Yes, it's time to begin seriously thinking about new economic models. Crunchy Frog May 30 #36
This is incompatible with liberalism. Self Esteem May 30 #41
Again, that's not a sustainable model EdmondDantes_ May 30 #55
Nope. Self Esteem May 30 #56
The Earth is not "just fine". NickB79 May 30 #71
Sure it is. Self Esteem May 30 #73
I'll probably get thrown out of here for this, but, Conjuay May 31 #89
If you want to support the social safety yet - yes that's the only answer. Self Esteem May 31 #99
So making ever greater quantities of junk Crunchy Frog May 30 #75
You're making an argument that isn't being made. Self Esteem May 31 #101
You accuse me of throwing out meaningless strawmen, then throw in meaningless stories about US cities. Crunchy Frog Jun 1 #107
Incorrect Self Esteem Jun 1 #114
TLDR, putting you on ignore now. Crunchy Frog Jun 1 #115
lmao...slink away. Self Esteem Jun 1 #116
No, it is not. RandomNumbers May 31 #88
Overpopulation is not the issue. Self Esteem May 31 #103
Capitalism also demands endless growth Retrograde May 30 #53
Civilization can maintain. The Plague proved that. haele May 30 #70
More like too much population that can't be supported on the limited resources this planet has. mwmisses4289 May 30 #58
The "survival of the planet"? The Earth is not "alive" but has living things on it that can die. elocs May 31 #83
Normally when people say "survival of the planet" RandomNumbers May 31 #96
I'll take the truth & honesty over rhetorical shorthand any day. elocs May 31 #97
You're calling someone "dishonest" RandomNumbers May 31 #98
I was asking why you said the falling birthrate was scary, not what the article said LearnedHand May 29 #10
Not enough young working folks to support an aging population.... Happy Hoosier May 30 #46
Yes to your last sentence RandomNumbers May 31 #86
Ross Douthat?? A right wing hack. madinmaryland May 29 #9
I don't know RJ-MacReady May 29 #11
Could you explain a little more? nt LAS14 May 29 #12
Not really RJ-MacReady May 30 #39
Douthat is not a scientist, anthropologist, statistician, or sociologist. There is no reason to take what he says WhiskeyGrinder May 29 #13
He was interviewing a person who had studied this issue extensively. nt LAS14 May 29 #14
Ha, that's on me, for drinking on a Thursday night. What do you find scary about it all? WhiskeyGrinder May 29 #16
Here's a fairly recent study from The Lancet TheProle May 29 #18
doesnt the workforce make things for ppl? wont fewer ppl need fewer products? mopinko May 29 #21
need vs want Retrograde May 30 #57
since 60% of americans mopinko May 30 #59
LOL. AI is going to make all of us obsolete anyway. The last thing we need is more people to Scrivener7 May 30 #37
Handmaids. milestogo May 29 #19
The article says the birth rate hasn't declined as much with muslims questionseverything May 29 #20
Disney parks and eating out will be a helluva lot more enjoyable. BannonsLiver May 29 #22
LOL!!!!! valleyrogue May 29 #23
Alice Evans appears to be a lunatic (not to mention an idiot as well) Wiz Imp May 30 #25
No, there are some who agree with her. Don't ask me who, because I'm not going to go seek Scrivener7 May 30 #38
Governments around the world are trying to find ways to replace their populations. nt LAS14 May 30 #48
That sounds extremely dangerous. MorbidButterflyTat May 30 #67
Well, we're not. We're imprisoning and deporting immigrants. yardwork May 31 #94
If you keep going backwards jumping 1000 years, the world was always surviving with fewer people and if the RoeVWade May 30 #27
I think Elon talks about it quite a bit Crunchy Frog May 30 #28
Not sure when we reached 1 billion, but we reached 4 billion around 1980, and in just the following Cloudhopper May 30 #30
The world population reached one billion in the early years of the 1800s. Crunchy Frog May 30 #35
obviously there was no innovation and no economic growth DBoon May 30 #54
Automation will fill in where humans can't uponit7771 May 30 #32
Meh. When I was born the population of the USA was about 180 million. Today it's twice that. Scrivener7 May 30 #34
The thing of it is, more women are not going for men at all. valleyrogue May 30 #61
Yes. Because for the first time in history, they don't have to. That's a good thing. Scrivener7 May 30 #62
I think pro-natalism is the wrong path. Oneironaut May 30 #40
Kudos for taking the question seriously and proposing a path forward. nt LAS14 May 30 #49
Going with, appreciate MORE who is here and not act like just churning out workers? Brainfodder May 30 #42
I only scanned the article, but... LudwigPastorius May 30 #43
I see that a lot of people assume that bringing attention to a problem is the same thing... LAS14 May 30 #44
what problem though? RJ-MacReady May 30 #45
Did you read the article? nt LAS14 May 30 #47
Yes I did RJ-MacReady May 30 #52
This is DU where there is no requirement to actually read an article to respond to it elocs May 31 #84
Endless population growth is a problem ITAL May 30 #50
Thanks for this. For acknowledging a problem and not leaping onto the... LAS14 May 30 #64
Elbow room lame54 May 30 #51
A much saner view of the topic which correctly points out that it is nothing remotely to fear. Wiz Imp May 30 #60
Interesting points. Thanks. nt LAS14 May 30 #65
+1 leftstreet May 30 #66
Make the old people take care of the babies, Crunchy Frog May 30 #80
Human population decline is a very good thing for the biosphere Mysterian May 31 #90
So women are supposed to get pregnant chowmama May 30 #63
The interview did not propose a solution. It simply described... LAS14 Jun 1 #113
Manufacturing fear MorbidButterflyTat May 30 #68
Climate change is expected to kill 10's, maybe 100's of millions Kaleva May 30 #69
Food insecurity (starvation) and declining health due to Mango Menace policies will do far worse damage dickthegrouch May 30 #72
Could be, could be. nt LAS14 Jun 1 #112
We allow in more immigrants, that's what we do. viva la May 30 #76
Supposedly it already has. Littlered May 30 #77
Evolution has no direction. Maybe the survivors will shrink to Hobbit size and learn how to live and let live. Ping Tung May 30 #81
We should be so lucky Raine May 31 #82
Same as it ever was ... the rich get richer, the poor suffer RandomNumbers May 31 #85
Thanks for the thoughtful and insightful response!! nt LAS14 Jun 1 #111
There Are Many Threats to Humanity. A Low Birth Rate Isn't One of Them. RandomNumbers May 31 #87
Thanks for a response that addresses the question, not the personalties. nt LAS14 Jun 1 #110
Such nonsense. 8 billion people in the world. travelingthrulife May 31 #91
Islam eventually takes over the world madville May 31 #92
Islam is the fastest growing religion in the world. yardwork May 31 #95
I liked the article, but I don't think it has solutions. gulliver May 31 #102
It absolutely doesn't have solutions. That's why I found it scary. LAS14 Jun 1 #109
More right-wing bullshit. Aristus May 31 #106
Aha! An answer that addresses the question, not the people articulating it. Thanks. LAS14 Jun 1 #108
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What will happen if(when?...»Reply #83