Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does it occur to any of you who are posting AI slop - AI art - that it's always a slap at the artists and photographers [View all]highplainsdem
(56,305 posts)67. Stunning, and painful to watch.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Does it occur to any of you who are posting AI slop - AI art - that it's always a slap at the artists and photographers [View all]
highplainsdem
Thursday
OP
I think that your logic is the same that has always been used to oppose progress.
totodeinhere
Thursday
#2
Thank you. Although it's heartbreaking to read about you or any other creative feeling "What's the point?" of
highplainsdem
Thursday
#8
Think of the money that would have been saved if tech companies and venture capitalists hadn't
highplainsdem
Thursday
#13
We always have a choice not to go with the flow. And everything Grok, Musk's AI, churns out is an
highplainsdem
Thursday
#15
It can be rejected as unethical, flawed, harmful technology. And it should be. Especially by
highplainsdem
Thursday
#23
I've seen beautiful collages done with art that's in the public domain. Or you might try to
highplainsdem
Friday
#64
Thanks for the kind words! And I really hope people won't use AI for posts here. It would
highplainsdem
Thursday
#35
I've seen so many teachers bring this up, when talking about AI, that I felt I had to mention it.
highplainsdem
Thursday
#40
True all too frequently. Often they tell themselves everyone else is doing it, it's inevitable, etc.
highplainsdem
Thursday
#38
That's both funny and sad. And I'd always advise against people trusting AI overviews/summaries
highplainsdem
Thursday
#39
Kudos to your daughters for being so talented and so ethical. (And to you for doing such a great
highplainsdem
Thursday
#43
You should always reject it because it's unethical and harmful. Please don't use ANY AI-generated slop,
highplainsdem
Thursday
#25
Not a good use. They're musicians betraying visual artists. One of my favorite rock singers
highplainsdem
Thursday
#33
The music is fine. Using AI for the video is completely unethical AND really clueless for a musician, because
highplainsdem
Friday
#47
AI is the equivalent of an invasive species and it will take over if not eliminated. nt
ImNotGod
Thursday
#28
We have no idea where this is going. The people behind it are all the Elons of the world, and it's about
Scrivener7
Friday
#55
I know. And some of the AI users creating those videos are cynical exploiters who were making AI
highplainsdem
Friday
#56
Yes, genAI is always a slap at artists and photographers. Some artists and photographers just refuse
highplainsdem
Friday
#61
Tell me how a few artists finding it profitable to work with AI can cancel out the incalculably vast theft
highplainsdem
Friday
#66
To/at - not a substantial difference. What I said is that not all artists agree.
Ms. Toad
Friday
#72
It's a complete difference. You're talking about a different subject - feelings about AI versus
highplainsdem
Friday
#73