To describe references to nonexistent scientific research as some formatting issues is like saying the Titanic confronted some evening issues.
As more fake citations emerge in the âMAHAâ report, White House struggles with a defense
To describe references to nonexistent scientific research as âsome formatting issuesâ is like saying the Titanic confronted âsome evening issues.â www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddo...
— Democracy Skies in Blueness - Resist (@democracyblue.bsky.social) 2025-05-30T13:28:42.960Z
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/fake-citations-emerge-maha-report-white-house-struggles-defense-rcna209915
Almost immediately after Donald Trump and his White House team unveiled The MAHA Report: Making Our Children Healthy Again last week, problems emerged.
The Washington Post reported, for example, that some of the reports suggestions stretched the limits of science, and offered misleading representations of scientific research.
A week later, a devastating report published by NOTUS advanced the underlying story considerably, highlighting the unambiguous fact that the MAHA document misinterprets some studies and cites others that dont exist, according to the listed authors. Soon after, The New York Times identified additional faulty references in the report. From the Times article:
The Trump administration released a report last week that it billed as a clear, evidence-based foundation for action on a range of childrens health issues. But the report, from the presidential Make America Healthy Again Commission, cited studies that did not exist. These included fictitious studies on direct-to-consumer drug advertising, mental illness and medications prescribed for children with asthma.
While theres been no official explanation for how, exactly, Health Secretary Robert F.
Kennedy Jr. and his team managed to release a much-hyped official document with fake citations, multiple reports noted the likely culprit. As The Washington Post reported,
Some of the citations ... appear to have been generated using artificial intelligence, resulting in numerous garbled scientific references and invented studies, AI experts said Thursday.
.....For example, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt was pressed for some kind of explanation for the MAHA debacle. The presidents chief spokesperson responded by claiming there were some formatting issues with the document.
https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:iu4j537hox5huj4bwnwgub4z/post/3lqdc55klup2i
.....Leavitt nevertheless added that the White House has complete confidence in Kennedy. She didnt elaborate as to why, exactly, Kennedy remains in the presidents good graces, though it appears to have something to do with Trumps indifference to whether the conspiracy theorist leading the Department of Health and Human Services gets things right or wrong.