Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does it occur to any of you who are posting AI slop - AI art - that it's always a slap at the artists and photographers [View all]Ms. Toad
(37,374 posts)57. Not all artists agree with you.
Last edited Fri May 30, 2025, 05:41 PM - Edit history (1)
Here are two who are prominent enough to have their art on display in relatively prestigious locations - who disagree that AI is "always a slap at the artists and photographers.
Stephanie Dinkins
Stephanie Dinkins is a transdisciplinary artist and educator whose work intersects emerging technologies and our future histories. Her art practice is deeply committed to creating platforms for dialogue about AI as it intersects with these critical societal issues. As an LG - Guggenheim Awardee, and one of Time Magazines 100 Most Influential People in AI (2023), Dinkins leverages technology and storytelling to challenge and reimagine the narratives surrounding marginalized communities, particularly those of Black and brown individuals. Through her installations, digital platforms, and community-based projects, Dinkins seeks not only to question the current paradigms of AI development but also to forge paths toward more equitable and inclusive technological futures. Her work emphasizes the importance of incorporating diverse voices and perspectives into the design and application of AI, advocating for a future where technology uplifts and amplifies underrepresented histories and experiences and fostering a tech ecosystem that is truly beneficial for all.
https://www.stephaniedinkins.com/projects.html
Her work has been exhibited in such places as Studio Museum in Harlem, the Metropolitan Museum of Art, and the Victoria and Albert Museum
Refik Anadol
Refik Anadols work locates creativity at the intersection of humans and machines. Taking the data that surrounds us as primary material, and the neural network of a computerized mind as a collaborator, Anadol offers us radical visualizations of our digitized memories and expands the possibilities of interdisciplinary arts. Anadols AI data paintings and sculptures, live audio/visual performances, and immersive installations take many forms, while encouraging us to rethink our engagement with the physical world, public art, decentralized networks, and the creative potential of AI. Entire buildings come to life. Floors, walls, and ceilings disappear into infinity. Breathtaking aesthetics take shape from large swaths of data, and what was once invisible to the human eye becomes visible, offering the audience a new perspective on, and narrative of their environments.
https://refikanadol.com/events/
A piece in the permanent collection of MoMA:
https://www.instagram.com/p/CyQtuiTryoU/?img_index=1
(Note: I had originally skipped this thread, but you keep pointing to it to assert that AI offends all artists and photographers, so I decided it needed the voice of a couple of artists who disagree. It is not the reality that AI Art is "always a slap at the artists and photographers." )
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Does it occur to any of you who are posting AI slop - AI art - that it's always a slap at the artists and photographers [View all]
highplainsdem
May 29
OP
I think that your logic is the same that has always been used to oppose progress.
totodeinhere
May 29
#2
Thank you. Although it's heartbreaking to read about you or any other creative feeling "What's the point?" of
highplainsdem
May 29
#8
Think of the money that would have been saved if tech companies and venture capitalists hadn't
highplainsdem
May 29
#13
We always have a choice not to go with the flow. And everything Grok, Musk's AI, churns out is an
highplainsdem
May 29
#15
It can be rejected as unethical, flawed, harmful technology. And it should be. Especially by
highplainsdem
May 29
#23
I've seen beautiful collages done with art that's in the public domain. Or you might try to
highplainsdem
May 30
#64
Thanks for the kind words! And I really hope people won't use AI for posts here. It would
highplainsdem
May 29
#35
I've seen so many teachers bring this up, when talking about AI, that I felt I had to mention it.
highplainsdem
May 29
#40
True all too frequently. Often they tell themselves everyone else is doing it, it's inevitable, etc.
highplainsdem
May 29
#38
That's both funny and sad. And I'd always advise against people trusting AI overviews/summaries
highplainsdem
May 29
#39
Kudos to your daughters for being so talented and so ethical. (And to you for doing such a great
highplainsdem
May 29
#43
You should always reject it because it's unethical and harmful. Please don't use ANY AI-generated slop,
highplainsdem
May 29
#25
Not a good use. They're musicians betraying visual artists. One of my favorite rock singers
highplainsdem
May 29
#33
The music is fine. Using AI for the video is completely unethical AND really clueless for a musician, because
highplainsdem
May 30
#47
AI is the equivalent of an invasive species and it will take over if not eliminated. nt
ImNotGod
May 29
#28
We have no idea where this is going. The people behind it are all the Elons of the world, and it's about
Scrivener7
May 30
#55
I know. And some of the AI users creating those videos are cynical exploiters who were making AI
highplainsdem
May 30
#56
Yes, genAI is always a slap at artists and photographers. Some artists and photographers just refuse
highplainsdem
May 30
#61
Tell me how a few artists finding it profitable to work with AI can cancel out the incalculably vast theft
highplainsdem
May 30
#66
To/at - not a substantial difference. What I said is that not all artists agree.
Ms. Toad
May 30
#72
It's a complete difference. You're talking about a different subject - feelings about AI versus
highplainsdem
May 30
#73