Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pinkstarburst

(1,739 posts)
52. AI in the arts is trained off of stolen work
Fri May 30, 2025, 10:54 AM
Friday

The ability to create AI graphics exists because graphic art was stolen to feed and train AI programs. The actual artists who produced that art did not consent and were not paid. When you use those AI generators, you are encouraging this practice of stealing from those artists, and encouraging more AI systems to be made.

The ability to type questions into an AI program and get a written response is because those AI programs were fed lots of stolen material. There is currently a lawsuit against Meta/Zuckerberg because they stole MILLIONS of books from authors to train their AI.

Listening to AI books means you're cutting real narrators out of the process and in many cases, those AI narrators many have been trained on voices that were used without permission.

AI is absolutely terrible for the environment. The AI generation centers that are going up use a terrible amount of power, and a terrible amount of water, at a time when we need to be using LESS power and CONSERVING water. So think about that the next time you consider using AI just for a small task. It is literally killing our planet.

There are good uses for AI. I hope it can help us in certain fields. But all of the above uses are bad because they replace THINKING and they replace CREATIVITY or because they replace ART. We as humans should not be using a machine to dumb ourselves down. Let AI be used for better cancer detection rates, or to make navigational systems better. Not to replace THINKING.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I so agree. WhiteTara Thursday #1
Thanks! highplainsdem Thursday #4
I think that your logic is the same that has always been used to oppose progress. totodeinhere Thursday #2
You're wrong. And generative AI is anything but progress. highplainsdem Thursday #3
This message was self-deleted by its author George McGovern Thursday #10
faulty comparison SouthBayDem Thursday #31
I can speak to this EarlG Thursday #5
Thank you. Although it's heartbreaking to read about you or any other creative feeling "What's the point?" of highplainsdem Thursday #8
I miss SwampRat's pictures. yardwork Thursday #11
I miss pic of the moment but I totally understand your point. CrispyQ Thursday #32
Don't use AI. Use A1. progressoid Thursday #44
Absofuckingloutely! SheltieLover Thursday #6
Thanks! highplainsdem Thursday #34
what do you mean by "stealing"? k_buddy762 Thursday #7
See this article: highplainsdem Thursday #12
Most of it wasn't trained on open source or public domain stuff. Ms. Toad Thursday #16
All AI has been trained on stolen material pinkstarburst Friday #49
Think of the money that would have been saved Progressive dog Thursday #9
Think of the money that would have been saved if tech companies and venture capitalists hadn't highplainsdem Thursday #13
It is- that's capitalism... JCMach1 Thursday #22
A comedian (I forget who) was talking about the Sistine Chapel after niyad Friday #58
The young do not buy art anymore womanofthehills Thursday #14
We always have a choice not to go with the flow. And everything Grok, Musk's AI, churns out is an highplainsdem Thursday #15
it doesnt matter,its coming moonshinegnomie Thursday #18
It can be rejected as unethical, flawed, harmful technology. And it should be. Especially by highplainsdem Thursday #23
It does matter. Scrivener7 Thursday #29
Problem is - the market has shrunk - people rarely buy wall art now womanofthehills Friday #63
I've seen beautiful collages done with art that's in the public domain. Or you might try to highplainsdem Friday #64
If I may, Highplainsdem, JMCKUSICK Thursday #17
Thanks for the kind words! And I really hope people won't use AI for posts here. It would highplainsdem Thursday #35
Thank you Highplainsdem, JMCKUSICK Thursday #37
I've seen so many teachers bring this up, when talking about AI, that I felt I had to mention it. highplainsdem Thursday #40
I'm guessing no. Like it doesn't occur to Airbnb users LisaM Thursday #19
True all too frequently. Often they tell themselves everyone else is doing it, it's inevitable, etc. highplainsdem Thursday #38
People do not understand or respect intellectual property. LisaM Thursday #41
Semi-related ... krkaufman Thursday #20
That's both funny and sad. And I'd always advise against people trusting AI overviews/summaries highplainsdem Thursday #39
I have two artist daughters. Americanme Thursday #21
Kudos to your daughters for being so talented and so ethical. (And to you for doing such a great highplainsdem Thursday #43
That's a good one. usonian Thursday #24
You should always reject it because it's unethical and harmful. Please don't use ANY AI-generated slop, highplainsdem Thursday #25
You're fighting the good fight here. WhiskeyGrinder Thursday #26
Thanks. I'm trying. highplainsdem Thursday #36
I have seen only one good use for AI art so far The Madcap Thursday #27
Not a good use. They're musicians betraying visual artists. One of my favorite rock singers highplainsdem Thursday #33
I happen to like the deforming images, The Madcap Thursday #46
The music is fine. Using AI for the video is completely unethical AND really clueless for a musician, because highplainsdem Friday #47
I agree pinkstarburst Friday #51
Whether the image is appealing or not, it's still stolen pinkstarburst Friday #50
AI is the equivalent of an invasive species and it will take over if not eliminated. nt ImNotGod Thursday #28
Haven't seen that comparison before, but it's a good one. highplainsdem Friday #48
AI is the devil. Scrivener7 Thursday #30
It's certainly functioning as a devil. Did you see the video posted at highplainsdem Friday #53
We have no idea where this is going. The people behind it are all the Elons of the world, and it's about Scrivener7 Friday #55
100% agree obamanut2012 Thursday #42
Thanks! highplainsdem Friday #54
I stopped watching a lot of the videos here. progressoid Thursday #45
I know. And some of the AI users creating those videos are cynical exploiters who were making AI highplainsdem Friday #56
AI in the arts is trained off of stolen work pinkstarburst Friday #52
Not all artists agree with you. Ms. Toad Friday #57
Yes, genAI is always a slap at artists and photographers. Some artists and photographers just refuse highplainsdem Friday #61
So who appointed you God of what artists should feel, Ms. Toad Friday #65
Tell me how a few artists finding it profitable to work with AI can cancel out the incalculably vast theft highplainsdem Friday #66
You said it was always a slap to artists. Ms. Toad Friday #70
I said it was a slap AT artists, not TO them. Look at my OP. highplainsdem Friday #71
To/at - not a substantial difference. What I said is that not all artists agree. Ms. Toad Friday #72
It's a complete difference. You're talking about a different subject - feelings about AI versus highplainsdem Friday #73
Some people don't seem to care MorbidButterflyTat Friday #59
Stunning, and painful to watch. highplainsdem Friday #67
I have so much to say about hating AI and posting clickbait memes but I won't. blogslug Friday #60
I can understand people wanting to do that. highplainsdem Friday #68
Thank you. mucholderthandirt Friday #62
You're welcome, and I'm so sorry your work was stolen for training AI. highplainsdem Friday #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does it occur to any of y...»Reply #52