Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Does it occur to any of you who are posting AI slop - AI art - that it's always a slap at the artists and photographers [View all]LisaM
(29,221 posts)19. I'm guessing no. Like it doesn't occur to Airbnb users
that they are decimating rental stock in expensive cities and tourist towns (and driving up rents, too). I still can't get my friends to stop using them. Or people who voted for a $20 minimum wage not to use gig companies like Shipt and DoorDash.
People do what's easy and convenient for them without regard to how it affects others.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
4 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Does it occur to any of you who are posting AI slop - AI art - that it's always a slap at the artists and photographers [View all]
highplainsdem
Thursday
OP
I think that your logic is the same that has always been used to oppose progress.
totodeinhere
Thursday
#2
Thank you. Although it's heartbreaking to read about you or any other creative feeling "What's the point?" of
highplainsdem
Thursday
#8
Think of the money that would have been saved if tech companies and venture capitalists hadn't
highplainsdem
Thursday
#13
We always have a choice not to go with the flow. And everything Grok, Musk's AI, churns out is an
highplainsdem
Thursday
#15
It can be rejected as unethical, flawed, harmful technology. And it should be. Especially by
highplainsdem
Thursday
#23
I've seen beautiful collages done with art that's in the public domain. Or you might try to
highplainsdem
Friday
#64
Thanks for the kind words! And I really hope people won't use AI for posts here. It would
highplainsdem
Thursday
#35
I've seen so many teachers bring this up, when talking about AI, that I felt I had to mention it.
highplainsdem
Thursday
#40
True all too frequently. Often they tell themselves everyone else is doing it, it's inevitable, etc.
highplainsdem
Thursday
#38
That's both funny and sad. And I'd always advise against people trusting AI overviews/summaries
highplainsdem
Thursday
#39
Kudos to your daughters for being so talented and so ethical. (And to you for doing such a great
highplainsdem
Thursday
#43
You should always reject it because it's unethical and harmful. Please don't use ANY AI-generated slop,
highplainsdem
Thursday
#25
Not a good use. They're musicians betraying visual artists. One of my favorite rock singers
highplainsdem
Thursday
#33
The music is fine. Using AI for the video is completely unethical AND really clueless for a musician, because
highplainsdem
Friday
#47
AI is the equivalent of an invasive species and it will take over if not eliminated. nt
ImNotGod
Thursday
#28
We have no idea where this is going. The people behind it are all the Elons of the world, and it's about
Scrivener7
Friday
#55
I know. And some of the AI users creating those videos are cynical exploiters who were making AI
highplainsdem
Friday
#56
Yes, genAI is always a slap at artists and photographers. Some artists and photographers just refuse
highplainsdem
Friday
#61
Tell me how a few artists finding it profitable to work with AI can cancel out the incalculably vast theft
highplainsdem
Friday
#66
To/at - not a substantial difference. What I said is that not all artists agree.
Ms. Toad
Friday
#72
It's a complete difference. You're talking about a different subject - feelings about AI versus
highplainsdem
Friday
#73