Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

EarlG

(22,994 posts)
5. I can speak to this
Thu May 29, 2025, 01:14 PM
May 29

There are two reasons I stopped making "Pics of the Moment" for the DU front page. The first is pretty straightforward -- after the election I was completely burned out on politics. Trump was going to be president, and my pics frequently referenced Trump, and I could not stand to look at his face any more. It's why I have not manually posted a pic of Trump's face to the DU homepage since he became president again (the video thumbnails that show up in the right column are auto-posted) .

But the second is because any talent that I might have had when it came to making those things is now basically irrelevant. For example, if this Trump/TACO story had happened any time before 2025, I daresay I would have enjoyed spending a few hours conceptualizing and creating a Photoshopped image of something related to Trump and TACO, which I would have posted on DU's front page for people's amusement (or not -- I know I didn't post a winner every single day of the week, lol).

But now I kinda feel like... what's the point? Anybody with access to an AI image generator can now fart out a Trump/TACO image in a few seconds, requiring zero thought or talent. None of it has the "human touch," but that's not really the point -- the point is that even if a Photoshopped image that I create ISN'T auto-generated slop, it's still going to get lost in an online ocean of actual auto-generated slop. I feel like I'd just be wasting my time.

So I can personally attest to the fact that AI is changing the creative landscape.

By the way, I share these thoughts purely as an example of how AI is affecting creators. I would prefer it if after reading this comment people didn't start badgering me to create new rules to get rid of AI on DU. That's a separate discussion, and I've explained at length, elsewhere, the problems with trying to do it.

I so agree. WhiteTara May 29 #1
Thanks! highplainsdem May 29 #4
I think that your logic is the same that has always been used to oppose progress. totodeinhere May 29 #2
You're wrong. And generative AI is anything but progress. highplainsdem May 29 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author George McGovern May 29 #10
faulty comparison SouthBayDem May 29 #31
I can speak to this EarlG May 29 #5
Thank you. Although it's heartbreaking to read about you or any other creative feeling "What's the point?" of highplainsdem May 29 #8
I miss SwampRat's pictures. yardwork May 29 #11
I miss pic of the moment but I totally understand your point. CrispyQ May 29 #32
Don't use AI. Use A1. progressoid May 29 #44
Absofuckingloutely! SheltieLover May 29 #6
Thanks! highplainsdem May 29 #34
what do you mean by "stealing"? k_buddy762 May 29 #7
See this article: highplainsdem May 29 #12
Most of it wasn't trained on open source or public domain stuff. Ms. Toad May 29 #16
All AI has been trained on stolen material pinkstarburst Friday #49
Think of the money that would have been saved Progressive dog May 29 #9
Think of the money that would have been saved if tech companies and venture capitalists hadn't highplainsdem May 29 #13
It is- that's capitalism... JCMach1 May 29 #22
A comedian (I forget who) was talking about the Sistine Chapel after niyad Friday #58
The young do not buy art anymore womanofthehills May 29 #14
We always have a choice not to go with the flow. And everything Grok, Musk's AI, churns out is an highplainsdem May 29 #15
it doesnt matter,its coming moonshinegnomie May 29 #18
It can be rejected as unethical, flawed, harmful technology. And it should be. Especially by highplainsdem May 29 #23
It does matter. Scrivener7 May 29 #29
Problem is - the market has shrunk - people rarely buy wall art now womanofthehills Friday #63
I've seen beautiful collages done with art that's in the public domain. Or you might try to highplainsdem Friday #64
If I may, Highplainsdem, JMCKUSICK May 29 #17
Thanks for the kind words! And I really hope people won't use AI for posts here. It would highplainsdem May 29 #35
Thank you Highplainsdem, JMCKUSICK May 29 #37
I've seen so many teachers bring this up, when talking about AI, that I felt I had to mention it. highplainsdem May 29 #40
I'm guessing no. Like it doesn't occur to Airbnb users LisaM May 29 #19
True all too frequently. Often they tell themselves everyone else is doing it, it's inevitable, etc. highplainsdem May 29 #38
People do not understand or respect intellectual property. LisaM May 29 #41
Semi-related ... krkaufman May 29 #20
That's both funny and sad. And I'd always advise against people trusting AI overviews/summaries highplainsdem May 29 #39
I have two artist daughters. Americanme May 29 #21
Kudos to your daughters for being so talented and so ethical. (And to you for doing such a great highplainsdem May 29 #43
That's a good one. usonian May 29 #24
You should always reject it because it's unethical and harmful. Please don't use ANY AI-generated slop, highplainsdem May 29 #25
You're fighting the good fight here. WhiskeyGrinder May 29 #26
Thanks. I'm trying. highplainsdem May 29 #36
I have seen only one good use for AI art so far The Madcap May 29 #27
Not a good use. They're musicians betraying visual artists. One of my favorite rock singers highplainsdem May 29 #33
I happen to like the deforming images, The Madcap May 29 #46
The music is fine. Using AI for the video is completely unethical AND really clueless for a musician, because highplainsdem Friday #47
I agree pinkstarburst Friday #51
Whether the image is appealing or not, it's still stolen pinkstarburst Friday #50
AI is the equivalent of an invasive species and it will take over if not eliminated. nt ImNotGod May 29 #28
Haven't seen that comparison before, but it's a good one. highplainsdem Friday #48
AI is the devil. Scrivener7 May 29 #30
It's certainly functioning as a devil. Did you see the video posted at highplainsdem Friday #53
We have no idea where this is going. The people behind it are all the Elons of the world, and it's about Scrivener7 Friday #55
100% agree obamanut2012 May 29 #42
Thanks! highplainsdem Friday #54
I stopped watching a lot of the videos here. progressoid May 29 #45
I know. And some of the AI users creating those videos are cynical exploiters who were making AI highplainsdem Friday #56
AI in the arts is trained off of stolen work pinkstarburst Friday #52
Not all artists agree with you. Ms. Toad Friday #57
Yes, genAI is always a slap at artists and photographers. Some artists and photographers just refuse highplainsdem Friday #61
So who appointed you God of what artists should feel, Ms. Toad Friday #65
Tell me how a few artists finding it profitable to work with AI can cancel out the incalculably vast theft highplainsdem Friday #66
You said it was always a slap to artists. Ms. Toad Friday #70
I said it was a slap AT artists, not TO them. Look at my OP. highplainsdem Friday #71
To/at - not a substantial difference. What I said is that not all artists agree. Ms. Toad Friday #72
It's a complete difference. You're talking about a different subject - feelings about AI versus highplainsdem Friday #73
Some people don't seem to care MorbidButterflyTat Friday #59
Stunning, and painful to watch. highplainsdem Friday #67
I have so much to say about hating AI and posting clickbait memes but I won't. blogslug Friday #60
I can understand people wanting to do that. highplainsdem Friday #68
Thank you. mucholderthandirt Friday #62
You're welcome, and I'm so sorry your work was stolen for training AI. highplainsdem Friday #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does it occur to any of y...»Reply #5