Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It means Democrats take ending corruption within their party very seriously. SSJVegeta Apr 17 #1
While I think PACs, etc., should be illegal, I don't favor unilaterally disavowing all PAC money while the other side LauraInLA Apr 17 #2
Nobody is really advocating for that. SSJVegeta Apr 17 #8
Sorry, I thought that's what you were advocating with this quote: LauraInLA Apr 17 #11
Good point about the union lobbyist money!! SSJVegeta Apr 17 #15
Union Money like the Teamsters and the UAW bottomofthehill Apr 17 #40
P.S. Goods Unite Us documents companies and their political giving. LauraInLA Apr 17 #14
Thanks!!Have you looked at opensecrets? SSJVegeta Apr 17 #17
Yes, Letting Republicans have every single advantage Nixie Apr 17 #9
Corruption by beholdening yourself to special interests is an impediment SSJVegeta Apr 17 #36
Republicans are running the government. Nixie Apr 17 #43
We are not republicans. SSJVegeta Apr 17 #54
Your post isn't really about politics. It's more a quasi-religious Nixie Apr 17 #60
The post is about what Democrats are doing on a material level SSJVegeta Apr 17 #61
Politics isn't about gospel and you deciding who is or isn't Nixie Apr 17 #62
It's literally about whether the people you elect represent you SSJVegeta Apr 17 #64
But personal tangents about morals and corruption isn't Nixie Apr 17 #66
Perhaps you havent noticed the groundswell of support for the "fight the oligarchy" tour SSJVegeta Apr 17 #69
Who's taking bribes? MorbidButterflyTat Apr 18 #80
Democrat "takes" a $200 campaign contribution from someone working on Wall Street or a Pharma company: BRIBED! betsuni Apr 18 #81
That is not corruption. SSJVegeta Apr 18 #82
Who has changed votes or policy because of PACs (which cannot coordinate with candidates nor can they betsuni Apr 18 #87
Look it up SSJVegeta Apr 18 #92
Who has changed votes or policies because of PAC money? betsuni Apr 18 #93
Are you incapable of doing a search? SSJVegeta Apr 18 #95
That's a list of contributions. Where does it say he changed votes or policy? betsuni Apr 18 #96
First you said they cant coordinate or contribute directly. SSJVegeta Apr 18 #97
Here is somebody who has done those things. But he is far from the knly one SSJVegeta Apr 18 #94
Lots of people. SSJVegeta Apr 18 #83
Most of those in the Democratic coalition vote with each other the vast, vast, vast majority of the time. W_HAMILTON Apr 17 #68
Not how it works SSJVegeta Apr 17 #70
Oh bullshit. If 70% of the people supported something that their elected representative refused to support... W_HAMILTON Apr 17 #72
In that case, weed would be legal, insider trading for congresspeople would be illegal SSJVegeta Apr 17 #73
Yet you don't mention that same need for Republicans with exponentially more dollars. live love laugh Apr 17 #27
F Republicans SSJVegeta Apr 17 #37
Bullshit. live love laugh Apr 17 #41
What's bullshit? SSJVegeta Apr 17 #55
Amen Nixie Apr 17 #63
What is? SSJVegeta Apr 17 #65
Welcome to DU Nixie Apr 17 #67
Be more clear with your words. SSJVegeta Apr 17 #71
Not smart. Primarying and winning against another Dem does not trim the rethug majority... brush Apr 17 #78
I will reserve judgement until I see who is targeted and who the primary challenger is AZJonnie Apr 17 #3
Agreed -- we have to look critically at individual races, incumbents, and challengers. LauraInLA Apr 17 #5
Frankly nobody in a deep blue district can justify taking corporate pac money SSJVegeta Apr 17 #56
Yes, I think is called "democracy"... I thought that's supposed to be a GOOD thing!! InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 17 #77
Probably a response to what Pelosi did to AOC helpisontheway Apr 17 #4
We need new blood who, like their predecessors, are unafraid to lead. InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 17 #32
What did Pelosi do to AOC? betsuni Apr 17 #35
Lobbied against her for oversight committee..Pushed for 74 yr old man with cancer instead helpisontheway Apr 18 #91
I fear people think we're casting a TV show instead of dealing with policy and politics. CBHagman Apr 18 #101
Bad mistake.My guess is he will quit in a hissy fit. travelingthrulife Apr 17 #6
You could be right. MineralMan Apr 17 #13
Since he is paying himself $16,000 a month I'd guess not, YMMV nt EX500rider Apr 24 #119
I prefer to donate my money to take down republicans dem4decades Apr 17 #7
winning answer! thank you bottomofthehill Apr 17 #42
getting rid of out-of-touch, ineffective Democrats help to bring down repukes Skittles Apr 17 #51
Id'd rather an ineffective Democrat that gets elected , than a hellfire one that can't. It's a tough call but dem4decades Apr 17 #58
who is saying they cannot get elected? Skittles Apr 17 #59
He's proposing this for super safe blue districts only Arazi Apr 17 #74
I smell bullshit. His opponents are not Democrats. live love laugh Apr 17 #10
We have 2 open seats where elderly Dem MOC died and their R gov won't call elections Arazi Apr 17 #12
I don't believe in unliterally replacing all older Dems -- precision related to effectiveness is required. LauraInLA Apr 17 #19
That's the strategy he's proposing Arazi Apr 17 #34
Makes sense to me!! InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 17 #45
What does Hogg targeting Democrats have to do with the Republican governor not calling a replacement election? live love laugh Apr 17 #25
(butting in here) I think they mean it's disadvantageous to have so many older members, Qutzupalotl Apr 17 #29
Yes, that's exactly right Arazi Apr 17 #33
No, he doesn't. The voters themselves elected those politicians. W_HAMILTON Apr 17 #52
He's offering those voters a choice between two Dems Arazi Apr 17 #75
He doesn't need to offer them a damn thing -- again, who made him kingmaker? W_HAMILTON Apr 18 #105
The vice chair of the DNC. SSJVegeta Apr 18 #85
And he should immediately resign from that position. W_HAMILTON Apr 18 #106
I dont think schultz should have resigned. Nor should Hogg SSJVegeta Apr 18 #107
LOL, everything you've posted has indicated you would have been the first calling for her head. W_HAMILTON Apr 18 #108
I will not be donating to any efforts to break up the Democratic Party. MineralMan Apr 17 #16
I agree LetMyPeopleVote Apr 24 #112
This idea also incentivizes mediocre Democrats to do better Mike 03 Apr 17 #18
Follow the lead of Bernie & AOC... fight with no compromise!! InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 17 #47
I tend to agree with him. We can't do politics as usual anymore. We can't afford seat fillers being Vinca Apr 17 #20
Throwing millions around is politics as usual in my book n/t GusBob Apr 17 #22
It seems so, but it takes millions to run for office now. It's not like the old days, especially with Musk thrown in. Vinca Apr 17 #30
"We need a whole lot of AOCs out there"... truer words were never spoken!! InAbLuEsTaTe Apr 17 #49
If you are a development executive in Hollywood... Mike 03 Apr 17 #21
Sounds revolutionary Fiendish Thingy Apr 17 #23
$20 million to pit Democrats against each other MichMan Apr 17 #24
And where'd he get $20 million? live love laugh Apr 17 #26
Putting the word "grassroots" in front of $20 million purifies it. Everybody else's money is corrupt, of course. betsuni Apr 17 #38
grass roots my ass bottomofthehill Apr 17 #46
He also managed to raise 9 million dollars in the last election cycle bottomofthehill Apr 17 #48
WTF JI7 Apr 18 #88
Hogg is evidently using the Justice Democratic email list LetMyPeopleVote Apr 21 #111
Great JustAnotherGen Apr 17 #28
Member of the DNC should NOT be taking sides in primaries LetMyPeopleVote Apr 17 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author SSJVegeta Apr 18 #86
Bernie: "If they went into our emails I'm sure there would be statements that would be less than flattering betsuni Apr 18 #89
So you are calling on Hogg to likewise resign, yes? W_HAMILTON Apr 18 #90
I think that Hogg should sign the pledge or resign LetMyPeopleVote Apr 21 #110
I was a Clinton Delegate to the 2016 National Convention LetMyPeopleVote Apr 21 #109
I'm honestly seriously disappointed he was considered for DNC leadership when he posts stuff like this... PunkinPi Apr 18 #98
Ah, a thumb on the scales is cool now. Thumb or other finger. And don't say "rigging" -- that's betsuni Apr 17 #39
I was just about to say... W_HAMILTON Apr 17 #50
"I've got news for the Democratic establishment. They can't stop us." Demonizing Dems as corrupt riggers betsuni Apr 17 #53
Yeah, I bet some of the folks who were yelling about party superdelegates voting in the convention nomination... LudwigPastorius Apr 17 #79
Dem Status Quo is helping 1.0444 destroy democracy. PuraVidaDreamin Apr 17 #44
David Hogg is the shiny new idealist on the scene, whose actual experience and JohnSJ Apr 17 #57
This is right out of Putins playbook GusBob Apr 18 #100
"credentials are that he survived a terrible mass shooting." Like the other 3,000+ students at that campus nt EX500rider Apr 24 #120
Could be this is just a devil's advocate initiative dweller Apr 17 #76
Although I have stopped donating to D for a long time now Meowmee Apr 18 #84
Great idea! n/t GusBob Apr 18 #99
Democracy is best when we have choices. Gore1FL Apr 18 #102
Not a smart use of time & money imo SheltieLover Apr 18 #103
Sheldon Whitehouse made an important point about Dems not undermining ourselves jmbar2 Apr 18 #104
Hogg is being paid by his PAC LetMyPeopleVote Apr 24 #113
This is very interesting -- thank you for sharing! You should post this on its own! LauraInLA Apr 24 #114
Here is the thread LetMyPeopleVote Apr 24 #117
👍 LauraInLA Apr 24 #118
DNC Chair Ken Martin-Voters Should Pick their Candidates, Not Party Bosses LetMyPeopleVote Apr 24 #115
Here is more on what Hogg is being paid by his PAC and the fact that Hogg may be using DNC mailing lists to raise money LetMyPeopleVote Apr 24 #116
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"In unprecedented move, D...»Reply #83