Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "In unprecedented move, DNC official [David Hogg] to spend big to take down fellow Democrats" [View all]SSJVegeta
(499 posts)83. Lots of people.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
120 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

"In unprecedented move, DNC official [David Hogg] to spend big to take down fellow Democrats" [View all]
LauraInLA
Apr 17
OP
While I think PACs, etc., should be illegal, I don't favor unilaterally disavowing all PAC money while the other side
LauraInLA
Apr 17
#2
Perhaps you havent noticed the groundswell of support for the "fight the oligarchy" tour
SSJVegeta
Apr 17
#69
Democrat "takes" a $200 campaign contribution from someone working on Wall Street or a Pharma company: BRIBED!
betsuni
Apr 18
#81
Who has changed votes or policy because of PACs (which cannot coordinate with candidates nor can they
betsuni
Apr 18
#87
Most of those in the Democratic coalition vote with each other the vast, vast, vast majority of the time.
W_HAMILTON
Apr 17
#68
Oh bullshit. If 70% of the people supported something that their elected representative refused to support...
W_HAMILTON
Apr 17
#72
In that case, weed would be legal, insider trading for congresspeople would be illegal
SSJVegeta
Apr 17
#73
Yet you don't mention that same need for Republicans with exponentially more dollars.
live love laugh
Apr 17
#27
Not smart. Primarying and winning against another Dem does not trim the rethug majority...
brush
Apr 17
#78
I will reserve judgement until I see who is targeted and who the primary challenger is
AZJonnie
Apr 17
#3
Agreed -- we have to look critically at individual races, incumbents, and challengers.
LauraInLA
Apr 17
#5
Yes, I think is called "democracy"... I thought that's supposed to be a GOOD thing!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Apr 17
#77
Lobbied against her for oversight committee..Pushed for 74 yr old man with cancer instead
helpisontheway
Apr 18
#91
I fear people think we're casting a TV show instead of dealing with policy and politics.
CBHagman
Apr 18
#101
Id'd rather an ineffective Democrat that gets elected , than a hellfire one that can't. It's a tough call but
dem4decades
Apr 17
#58
We have 2 open seats where elderly Dem MOC died and their R gov won't call elections
Arazi
Apr 17
#12
I don't believe in unliterally replacing all older Dems -- precision related to effectiveness is required.
LauraInLA
Apr 17
#19
What does Hogg targeting Democrats have to do with the Republican governor not calling a replacement election?
live love laugh
Apr 17
#25
(butting in here) I think they mean it's disadvantageous to have so many older members,
Qutzupalotl
Apr 17
#29
LOL, everything you've posted has indicated you would have been the first calling for her head.
W_HAMILTON
Apr 18
#108
I tend to agree with him. We can't do politics as usual anymore. We can't afford seat fillers being
Vinca
Apr 17
#20
It seems so, but it takes millions to run for office now. It's not like the old days, especially with Musk thrown in.
Vinca
Apr 17
#30
Putting the word "grassroots" in front of $20 million purifies it. Everybody else's money is corrupt, of course.
betsuni
Apr 17
#38
Bernie: "If they went into our emails I'm sure there would be statements that would be less than flattering
betsuni
Apr 18
#89
I'm honestly seriously disappointed he was considered for DNC leadership when he posts stuff like this...
PunkinPi
Apr 18
#98
Ah, a thumb on the scales is cool now. Thumb or other finger. And don't say "rigging" -- that's
betsuni
Apr 17
#39
"I've got news for the Democratic establishment. They can't stop us." Demonizing Dems as corrupt riggers
betsuni
Apr 17
#53
Yeah, I bet some of the folks who were yelling about party superdelegates voting in the convention nomination...
LudwigPastorius
Apr 17
#79
"credentials are that he survived a terrible mass shooting." Like the other 3,000+ students at that campus nt
EX500rider
Apr 24
#120
This is very interesting -- thank you for sharing! You should post this on its own!
LauraInLA
Apr 24
#114
DNC Chair Ken Martin-Voters Should Pick their Candidates, Not Party Bosses
LetMyPeopleVote
Apr 24
#115