Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Judge Luttig just made news, saying that state rulings on whether Trump can be on the ballot WILL hit the SCOTUS, [View all]ancianita
(42,298 posts)12. True.
Keep in mind that that's why the party has fanned out to five battlegrounds.
Its the DNCs first round of staff hires in battleground states, drawing an early outline of the 2020 electoral map: Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, four of the closest states that Trump won in 2016, as well as Arizona which has slowly been moving to the left in recent years and voted for Trump by a narrow 3.5 percentage points in 2016 and Ohio, a traditional swing state that some Democrats argue should be considered a second-tier priority in 2020.
The new communications aides will work for state parties, but will be funded by the DNC, a new approach for the committee to building staff in swing states early during the election cycle.
This program is the on-the-ground, tip-of the spear effort to define and localize the negative impacts of Trumps broken promises and reach the voters we need to defeat him in key battleground states, said David Bergstein, battleground state communications director for the DNC.
The new communications officials will focus on publicizing negative local effects of Trumps policies to voters in each state, tapping surrogates and other popular Democrats to help. They will also work to counter the positive publicity that Trump garners when he holds rallies and other events.
The DNC is not the only Democratic organization going local to drive anti-Trump news coverage this cycle: American Bridge, traditionally an opposition research firm, has added a $50 million localized ad program to persuade small-town voters in swing states about the danger of Trumps policies.
The new communications aides will work for state parties, but will be funded by the DNC, a new approach for the committee to building staff in swing states early during the election cycle.
This program is the on-the-ground, tip-of the spear effort to define and localize the negative impacts of Trumps broken promises and reach the voters we need to defeat him in key battleground states, said David Bergstein, battleground state communications director for the DNC.
The new communications officials will focus on publicizing negative local effects of Trumps policies to voters in each state, tapping surrogates and other popular Democrats to help. They will also work to counter the positive publicity that Trump garners when he holds rallies and other events.
The DNC is not the only Democratic organization going local to drive anti-Trump news coverage this cycle: American Bridge, traditionally an opposition research firm, has added a $50 million localized ad program to persuade small-town voters in swing states about the danger of Trumps policies.
https://www.politico.com/story/2019/08/05/dnc-hires-staff-battleground-states-1445256
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Judge Luttig just made news, saying that state rulings on whether Trump can be on the ballot WILL hit the SCOTUS, [View all]
ancianita
Nov 2023
OP
I doubt it.The case calls for SCOTUS to make a constitutional ruling all states would be bound by. I believe Luttig.
ancianita
Nov 2023
#7
Me, too. If Trump was paying attention, he'd know not to appeal CO's keeping him off the ballot, and take the one hit
ancianita
Nov 2023
#8
Warmed the cockles of my old cold heart to hear Luttig's praise of Katyal
Attilatheblond
Nov 2023
#10
If not there, probably availble on the MSNBC website page or Nicole Wallace's show
Attilatheblond
Nov 2023
#15
I saw! The whole conversation was fantastic, and only brilliant Nicolle would think to bring these two together!
ancianita
Nov 2023
#17
Me, too! Any judgment by the two states could happen soon, & any appeals could slowly roll toward SCOTUS by early 2024.
ancianita
Nov 2023
#16
Luttig said that's not necessary, that his very "refusal to accept the election results" violated the Executive clause.
ancianita
Nov 2023
#19
no conviction needed, think of the age requirement for Prez, its works the same way
Hamlette
Nov 2023
#61
re: "Seems obvious that any State disqualifying Trump would result in a SC review"
thesquanderer
Nov 2023
#48
He might not, but other entities might, and a SCOTUS ruling that he'd disqualified will still be upheld across 50 states
ancianita
Nov 2023
#50
During 19th Century Reconstruction, insurrection was handled quickly and outside the courts or
bucolic_frolic
Nov 2023
#30
Neither should anyone, imo. Your SCOTUS read? Well done! Your insightful summary is calming.
ancianita
Nov 2023
#34
The definition used will be the legal definition, not the dictionary definition.
TwilightZone
Nov 2023
#43
As a non-lawyer, it would appear to me that there are a lot of people in Congress that this applies to.
ashredux
Nov 2023
#45
Jack Smith's team of Hulser and Harbach will likely apply it, too, under the "giving aid and comfort" clause of Sec 3
ancianita
Nov 2023
#55
As much as I distrust the SC and loathe Donald Trump, I don't think that he should be removed from the ballot
Chainfire
Nov 2023
#51
Luttig and Tribe say the opposite. That there needs by no trial or conviction. Even the states know the 14th, Sec. 3.
ancianita
Nov 2023
#56
I have read the text, and the legal interpretations, but to me, it seems like there is too big a case for lack of
Chainfire
Nov 2023
#58
You're thinking the SCOTUS will rule based due process in a trial. These two state cases are about direct violation
ancianita
Nov 2023
#59