Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumMuseum REFUSES Trump's Request To TAKE Historical Artifact - Really American
Really American host Steve Harness breaks down Trump demanding a sword from a presidential museum and firing the employee after his request gets denied! - 10/05/2025.
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Museum REFUSES Trump's Request To TAKE Historical Artifact - Really American (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
13 hrs ago
OP
MaddowBlog-The ridiculous reason Team Trump fired the director of the Eisenhower library
LetMyPeopleVote
13 hrs ago
#1
Someone needs to tell him that nothing in Presidential Libraries or U.S. museums are his!!!
Rhiannon12866
13 hrs ago
#2
LetMyPeopleVote
(170,781 posts)1. MaddowBlog-The ridiculous reason Team Trump fired the director of the Eisenhower library
Todd Arrington, the director of the Eisenhower library, was forced out of his job for having done the right thing. Hes hardly alone.
The ridiculous reason Team Trump fired the director of the Eisenhower library
— @billspaced (@billspaced.com) 2025-10-03T17:11:47.297Z
Ahead of Donald Trumpâs recent state visit to Britain, the president apparently wanted to present King Charles with some kind of gift, and administration officials settled on something related to Dwight Eisenhower. (Eis
https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-show/maddowblog/eisenhower-library-director-fired-sword-trump-charles-rcna235395
Ahead of Donald Trumps recent state visit to Britain, the president apparently wanted to present King Charles with some kind of gift, and administration officials settled on something related to Dwight Eisenhower. (Eisenhower, of course, led the Allied forces in World War II before getting elected to the White House.)
The New York Times reported what happened next:
...Rather, what makes this story extraordinary is that Todd Arrington, the director of the Eisenhower library, was soon after forced out of his job.
Technically, Arrington resigned, but he told the Times that it was not voluntary. I never imagined that I would be fired from almost 30 years of government service for this, he said......
In the case regarding the Eisenhower sword, Arrington received an email from a State Department liaison (she used a giftgirl2025 address) who said that the administration was looking for like a sword or something. Arrington, well aware of the fact that it wouldve been illegal to give away U.S. property, declined. His punishment came soon after.
This is, alas, a familiar dynamic. A prosecutor does the right thing by refusing to bring a corrupt indictment? Hes fired. An IRS official does the right thing by refusing to cooperate with a legally dubious DOGE request? Hes fired. A presidential librarian does the right thing by refusing to turn over a sword to be used as a foreign gift? Hes fired.
The message to federal officials everywhere is hardly subtle: When confronted with improper requests, your career will likely come to an abrupt end if the White House doesnt like your answer.
The New York Times reported what happened next:
Through a personal email address, an administration official approached the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library, Museum, and Boyhood Home in Abilene, Kan., which has at least one Eisenhower sword in its collection, given to him in 1947 by Queen Wilhelmina of the Netherlands. But the library declined to release it or any other original artifact in its collection, on the grounds that they are the property of the U.S. government, which the library is obligated by law to preserve for the American public.
...Rather, what makes this story extraordinary is that Todd Arrington, the director of the Eisenhower library, was soon after forced out of his job.
Technically, Arrington resigned, but he told the Times that it was not voluntary. I never imagined that I would be fired from almost 30 years of government service for this, he said......
In the case regarding the Eisenhower sword, Arrington received an email from a State Department liaison (she used a giftgirl2025 address) who said that the administration was looking for like a sword or something. Arrington, well aware of the fact that it wouldve been illegal to give away U.S. property, declined. His punishment came soon after.
This is, alas, a familiar dynamic. A prosecutor does the right thing by refusing to bring a corrupt indictment? Hes fired. An IRS official does the right thing by refusing to cooperate with a legally dubious DOGE request? Hes fired. A presidential librarian does the right thing by refusing to turn over a sword to be used as a foreign gift? Hes fired.
The message to federal officials everywhere is hardly subtle: When confronted with improper requests, your career will likely come to an abrupt end if the White House doesnt like your answer.
Rhiannon12866
(244,260 posts)2. Someone needs to tell him that nothing in Presidential Libraries or U.S. museums are his!!!
Like the Smithsonian!
Baitball Blogger
(51,038 posts)3. Who else thinks that this is precisely what
Is going on right now with everything else he can get his hands on?
some_of_us_are_sane
(2,190 posts)4. I expect no less
from the greedy "DEMANDER AND THIEF". He's a spoiled toddler in wrinkled old skin.