Liberal YouTubers

Rhiannon12866

(243,198 posts) Tue Sep 9, 2025, 04:24 AM Sep 9

🚨Trump gets GUTS RIPPED OUT by Appeals Court in FINAL ORDER - Meidas Touch

In breaking news, the only person to ever beat Trump twice in court and holding over $100 million in judgments against him for having survived his sexual abuse and defamation, E. Jean Carroll, just had her $83.5 million dollar abuse and defamation verdict affirmed 3-0 by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals.

Find out how Alina Habba and Trump lost the case so badly when Michael Popok does a deep dive into the new Opinion as E. Jean moves one big leap closer to getting the $100 million she is owed for her new foundation to support women. - 09/08/2025.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

🚨Trump gets GUTS RIPPED OUT by Appeals Court in FINAL ORDER - Meidas Touch (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Sep 9 OP

Chump had to put the $83 million into escrow in order to appeal and get the verdicts overruled FakeNoose Sep 9 #1

He'll appeal to the full court then to his friends in SCROTUS. Wonder Why Sep 9 #2

If the SCOTUS takes this case, it's BS WokeAintWhatIAm 6 hrs ago #3

FakeNoose

(38,685 posts)

1. Chump had to put the $83 million into escrow in order to appeal and get the verdicts overruled

Reply to Rhiannon12866 (Original post)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 10:08 AM

Sep 9

Doesn't the federal court already have his money in escrow? If so, they control the payout to Ms. Carroll.

Wonder Why

(6,202 posts)

2. He'll appeal to the full court then to his friends in SCROTUS.

Reply to FakeNoose (Reply #1)

Tue Sep 9, 2025, 10:43 AM

Sep 9

WokeAintWhatIAm

(26 posts)

3. If the SCOTUS takes this case, it's BS

Reply to Wonder Why (Reply #2)

Mon Sep 22, 2025, 06:01 AM

6 hrs ago

State Supreme Court can determine the compliance with the verdict with state law but it is a lawsuit not a criminal case.
This case would have to extend into areas of Constitutional conflict for it to be heard. Matters like amount of the award, obligation to pay, ability to pay in relation to actual award could come close to past precedent like the right to sue, but it would not be knocked down.

Reply to this discussion