Jane Harman, Former Democratic Congresswoman from California and former Ranking Member of the House Intelligence Committee says she would be "raising hell" over the Venezuela strikes and Congress is "on trial."

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he wasn’t watching when a top US admiral ordered a second strike on an alleged drug-running boat on Sept. 2, further distancing himself from an attack that has drawn bipartisan scrutiny and prompted accusations of possible war crimes.
Speaking at a Cabinet meeting alongside President Donald Trump, Hegseth said he watched the first strike live but then had other meetings to attend and only learned of the full sequence of events a “couple of hours later.” He voiced support for Admiral Frank Bradley, the commander who ordered the second strike, calling his decisions the right call “to ultimately sink the boat and eliminate the threat.”
“As you can imagine, at the Department of War, we got a lot of things to do, so I didn’t stick around for the hour and two hours, whatever, where all the sensitive site exploitation digitally occurs,” he said.

US strikes on alleged drug-cartel boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean under President Donald Trump represent a sharp departure from traditional US counter-narcotics efforts. Unlike earlier maritime interdictions led mainly by the Coast Guard and other law enforcement agencies, these missions have taken the form of military airstrikes.
The attacks have raised questions from legal experts and lawmakers about whether the military campaign is lawful. Critics of the policy say that under US and international law, killing noncombatants, including suspected criminals, who pose no immediate threat is illegal — murder in peacetime, a war crime in an armed conflict. They argue that the strikes amount to extralegal killings carried out under a baseless claim of self-defense.
In late November, bipartisan leaders of key congressional committees vowed to investigate a Sept. 2 operation in which US forces conducted a second strike against a boat after the first left two injured survivors. Administration officials denied a Washington Post report that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in a spoken directive, had instructed that US forces kill everyone on board the boat as US forces monitored it. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt confirmed there were two strikes and said they were lawful.

Trump has brushed aside criticism of the administration’s campaign and said he doesn’t plan to seek congressional authorization to carry out more attacks.
What do we know about the US strikes on alleged drug boats?
Since Sept. 1, the US military has conducted 21 strikes against purported drug-trafficking vessels, killing 82 people, according to the Pentagon. The White House claims these boats were engaged in illegal narco-trafficking and were linked to criminal organizations. The US has not disclosed evidence of their criminal affiliations or details about those killed. The US has simultaneously deployed a fleet of warships, aircraft and troops to the southern Caribbean.
In October, Venezuela’s ambassador to the United Nations accused the US of killing innocent people in the Caribbean, citing local reports that two of the men in one of the boat bombings were Trinidadian fishermen.
How has the US usually targeted alleged maritime drug smugglers?
The US has long worked to battle maritime drug smuggling through law enforcement operations focused on intercepting vessels, seizing illegal cargo, and detaining those on board for potential prosecution.
Traditionally, the Coast Guard has taken the lead on counter-drug trafficking operations at sea, often collaborating with the Navy and US Customs and Border Protection. Though these forces have very broad jurisdiction, operating anywhere on the seas other than in the territorial waters of another country that hasn’t given consent, their enforcement powers are limited to interdiction and arrest.