Cable News Clips

Rhiannon12866

(242,079 posts) Tue Aug 26, 2025, 08:35 PM Aug 26

Retired Major General calls Trump's National Guard plans 'unneeded and dangerous' - PBS NewsHour

Trump signed an executive order Monday that said each state’s National Guard units “are resourced, trained, organized and available to assist federal, state and local law enforcement in quelling civil disturbances.” Nick Schifrin discussed the latest with retired Army Major General Randy Manner, the former acting vice chief of the National Guard Bureau. - Aired on 08/26/2025.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Retired Major General calls Trump's National Guard plans 'unneeded and dangerous' - PBS NewsHour (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Aug 26 OP

Where are the active duty generals? RainCaster Aug 26 #1

Perhaps we'll see one speak out and risk court martial, but I doubt it. pat_k Aug 26 #2

It sounds like their courage is limited by their paychecks RainCaster Aug 26 #3

RainCaster

(13,066 posts)

1. Where are the active duty generals?

Reply to Rhiannon12866 (Original post)

Tue Aug 26, 2025, 08:42 PM

Aug 26

Are the retired ones the only ones with a spine? Wtf?

pat_k

(11,609 posts)

2. Perhaps we'll see one speak out and risk court martial, but I doubt it.

Reply to RainCaster (Reply #1)

Tue Aug 26, 2025, 09:57 PM

Aug 26

UCMJ Article 88: Commissioned officers who use "contemptuous words" against the President, Vice President, Congress, or other senior officials can face a court-martial. A conviction carries a maximum punishment of dismissal from the service, forfeiture of pay, and up to one year of confinement.

Although criticism of this off-the-rails president would be viewed by most as a patriotic duty, they could be prosecuted for "partisan activities." The proceedings would be darned interesting!

DoD Directive 1344.10: This directive explicitly prohibits active-duty military personnel from engaging in partisan political activities that could be perceived as associating the Department of Defense (DoD) with a political party or candidate.

Of course, they all take an oath to the Constitution, not to the person occupying the White House, so we could see active duty officers who take that oath seriously speaking out against actions that violate the Constitution. But such serving officers would have to be prepared to become the target of every horrible consequence the 47 regime would unleash against them.

RainCaster

(13,066 posts)

3. It sounds like their courage is limited by their paychecks

Reply to pat_k (Reply #2)

Tue Aug 26, 2025, 11:51 PM

Aug 26

... and not their belief in the Constitution.

Reply to this discussion