Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

2016 Postmortem

pbmus

(12,845 posts) Wed Jan 4, 2017, 04:28 PM Jan 2017

Less Safe is the New Republican Slogun

"Let's stare this reality square in the face: PEOTUS is pro-Putin and believes Julian Assange over the CIA. On Jan. 20 we will be less safe."

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/312618-former-cia-pentagon-spokesman-we-will-be-less-safe-under-trump

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Less Safe is the New Republican Slogun (Original Post) pbmus Jan 2017 OP

I'm not a fan of Assange NewJeffCT Jan 2017 #1

NewJeffCT

(56,844 posts)

1. I'm not a fan of Assange

Reply to pbmus (Original post)

Wed Jan 4, 2017, 04:33 PM

Jan 2017

but, I did a quick google search, but how often have the contents of what Wikileaks has released by wrong/doctored? While the information was hacked and not admissible in a court of law, when I searched for mistakes made by WL, I come up with a bunch of people boasting how they've never been wrong.

That said, if WL got the information from a third party, it could have been doctored before WL got it?

Reply to this discussion