Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ShazzieB

(20,772 posts)
Wed May 14, 2025, 12:23 AM May 14

Stop the Township of Toms River, NJ from Seizing Christ Episcopal Church

I hope it's okay to post this here. I promised to share it with at least one other person, and I can't think of any likely candidates among my direct contacts. The link below has the full information on it.

The Issue

On Tuesday, April 29, 2025, less than 24 hours before a scheduled Toms River Township Council meeting, a concerned community member alerted the leadership of Christ Church, Toms River, that the church property had been added to a proposal for an eminent domain ordinance. The mayor of Toms River is attempting to claim the 11-acre downtown church property, to be used as a recreational center and community park. Despite widespread community opposition, the motion passed its initial reading at the meeting on April 30.

This action is unjust. It comes while the congregation is seeking municipal permission to build a homeless shelter on their property as an extension of the church’s many ministries and programs that serve and support those in need in the Toms River community. If the eminent domain ordinance goes forward, Toms River will lose a vital source of support for vulnerable residents.

Christ Church is a large and active congregation with a longstanding commitment to outreach and community support, especially for those in need. Together, the people of Christ Church participate in more than 20 essential ministries that support the Toms River community and beyond. These offerings include feeding and clothing programs, multiple 12-step groups, and more. Christ Episcopal Church has been part of Toms River for 160 years and has a long history of service and outreach.

Now, the congregation of Christ Church, Toms River needs your support. Please sign our petition to tell the mayor and township council that people matter more than pickleball courts. Eminent domain should never be used to control a church’s ministries. We stand together with the congregation of Christ Episcopal Church, the Episcopal Diocese of New Jersey, and The Episcopal Church, to oppose the unjust actions of the Toms River mayor and township council.

*snip"

More info: https://chng.it/qsTQcPRvqv


If this is inappropriate for this forum please let me know, and I'll delete it. Thanks!
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stop the Township of Toms River, NJ from Seizing Christ Episcopal Church (Original Post) ShazzieB May 14 OP
I am glad to see this. Thanks for posting Trueblue1968 May 14 #1
K&R. Signed and contributed. Rhiannon12866 May 14 #2
When I saw the title, I thought it might be something about them refusing to settle white S. African "refugees" progree May 14 #3
This proposed taking is incongruent with the USSC decision no_hypocrisy May 14 #4

progree

(11,949 posts)
3. When I saw the title, I thought it might be something about them refusing to settle white S. African "refugees"
Wed May 14, 2025, 03:08 AM
May 14

Episcopal Church says it won't help resettle white South Africans granted refugee status in US, AP, 5/12/25
https://www.yahoo.com/news/episcopal-church-says-wont-help-164531139.html

no_hypocrisy

(51,711 posts)
4. This proposed taking is incongruent with the USSC decision
Wed May 14, 2025, 05:38 AM
May 14

of Kelo v. City of New London.

Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the five-justice majority that the city's use of eminent domain was permissible under the Takings Clause, because the general benefits the community would enjoy from economic growth qualified as "public use". The court held that if a legislative body has found that an economic project will create new jobs, increase tax and other city revenues, and revitalize a depressed urban area (even if that area is not blighted), then the project serves a public purpose, which qualifies as a public use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kelo_v._City_of_New_London

Christ Church: https://www.christchurchtomsriver.org/

Toms River Council is blowing right past the status of the property being blighted and the public can only benefit from redevelopment.

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»Christian Liberals & Progressive People of Faith»Stop the Township of Toms...