Fiction
Related: About this forumBlue sky thinking: why we need positive climate novels
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2025/aug/16/blue-sky-thinking-why-we-need-positive-climate-novelsBlue sky thinking: why we need positive climate novels
Environmental fiction is booming but can it move beyond dystopia to a brighter vision of the future?
Sarah Hall
Sat 16 Aug 2025 04.00 EDT
Nearly a quarter of a century ago when I published my first novel, Haweswater, about the impact of dam-building in north-west England, nature writing felt quite different, at least for me. Several landmark novels about climate apocalypse and survivalism had been published, including Z for Zachariah by Robert C OBrien and The Death of Grass by John Christopher, but there was no imperative to write about such things. These stories involved anomalistic catastrophes a mutated virus, nuclear war and they were very bleak. They resonated but also seemed unusual. At the other end of the scale, Ben Eltons Stark had comedically outlined the nature of oligarchic greed, resource consumption, and the ruination we were hurtling towards, while the Bezos and Musk equivalents could head off-world not quite so funny now.
In the 2000s, while the scientific data was righting itself from hacks and attacks, a whole spate of alarming nonfiction books arrived, forecasting the devastating effect of global temperature rises, mass extinctions, and the chaotic world that would occur if our trajectory of fossil fuel consumption, industrial farming, deforestation and the like wasnt altered. Books like Six Degrees (Mark Lynas), A World Without Bees (Alison Benjamin and Brian McCallum), and Half Gone (Jeremy Leggett) sounded the doom gong, loudly.
As a news-hungry novelist, I responded, wringing jeopardy from these predictions to create a dire, possible future. Full-throttle dystopian speculation seemed to be appropriate. I wrote The Carhullan Army, which imagines female paramilitary resistance in a Britain destabilised by flooding and politically fascistic, where rationing and population control are the new norms. Looking back, I can see this story arrived out of pure, exhilarated fear about impending ecological disaster, the repressive systems which could arise out of it and their effect, especially, on women. It was an attempt to ring the same warning bell, to create a virtual, experiential realm for the reader out of their propositions.
more ecotopia vs dystopia

hunter
(39,821 posts)There's no great discussion in the book about how this world evolved.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Always_Coming_Home
I don't think we have to blow ourselves to bits or tear what remains of the natural world apart seeking increasingly limited resources. That's not an inevitable consequence of the human condition.
Our planet can indefinitely support a thoughtful civilization and protect a natural environment that's constantly evolving in adaptation to the now inevitable climate changes.
We don't have to live in a world where billions of people are suffering and dying prematurely in support of absurd economic theories and religions that never reflected the realities of our physical world.
cbabe
(5,460 posts)PufPuf23
(9,539 posts)Not convinced that there is a technological fix nor the capability of the human species to turn back time or technology to the result without severe calamity.
Always Coming Home (or Callenbach's Ecotopia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecotopia) is feasible without a great reduction in human population and ego to re-set humanity's relation with the environment.
Another novelization of a new way of living is George Stewart's Earth Abides. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Abides Like Le Guin's father, the anthropologist Alfred Kroeber, George Stewart was a professor (of English) at Cal (UC Berkeley).