Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

littlemissmartypants

(35,544 posts)
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 05:11 AM 23 hrs ago

Shell expects 65% rise in global LNG demand by 2050

LONDON/SINGAPORE, June 30 (Reuters) - Global liquefied natural gas demand is expected to rise by around 65% by 2050, driven largely by Asia ‌as countries seek lower-emission alternatives to coal and data centres boost power demand, Shell said in an annual report on Tuesday.

Global demand is likely to reach nearly 700 million metric tons a year by that date, the world's largest trader of the superchilled fuel said in its 2026 LNG Outlook.

LNG trade, which reached 422 million tons in 2025, had been set to increase ​in 2026, it added. However, severe disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz has shut in around one-fifth of global monthly LNG supply ​since the Middle East conflict began.

As a result, global LNG trade in 2026 could be similar to last year's level if shipping ⁠through the strait returns to normal this summer, before returning to growth in 2027, Shell said.
...
https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/shell-expects-65-rise-global-lng-demand-by-2050-2026-06-30/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Shell expects 65% rise in global LNG demand by 2050 (Original Post) littlemissmartypants 23 hrs ago OP
I wouldn't bet against Shell on this OKIsItJustMe 23 hrs ago #1
Natural gas will be the energy source that destroys the world as we know it. hunter 15 hrs ago #2
Natural gas will not destroy "the world as we know it." It's too late for that scenario. OKIsItJustMe 15 hrs ago #3

OKIsItJustMe

(22,446 posts)
1. I wouldn't bet against Shell on this
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 05:22 AM
23 hrs ago
https://www.iea.org/news/coming-surge-in-lng-production-is-set-to-reshape-global-gas-markets
Coming surge in LNG production is set to reshape global gas markets
News
27 October 2025

New IEA medium-term outlook sees unprecedented expansion of liquefied natural gas capacity by 2030, with implications for energy security, demand and affordability

Global gas markets are set to undergo major changes by the end of this decade, with a coming wave of liquefied natural gas (LNG) production capacity set to transform market dynamics, according to the latest edition of the IEA’s medium-term outlook.

Gas 2025, out today, offers a comprehensive overview of potential supply, demand and trade trends in global natural gas markets for the coming years. It provides a thorough review of recent market developments ahead of the 2025-26 Northern Hemisphere winter and includes forecasts for how supply and demand could evolve to 2030.

According to the report, about 300 billion cubic metres (bcm) per year of LNG export capacity – a record – is set to be added by 2030, primarily supported by liquefaction capacity additions in the United States and Qatar. Over 80 bcm of annual LNG liquefaction capacity has been sanctioned in the United States year-to-date, an all-time high for the US LNG sector. This unprecedented worldwide expansion is expected to strengthen global supply security and ease market pressures following a period of tightness.

https://www.iea.org/reports/gas-2025

hunter

(40,957 posts)
2. Natural gas will be the energy source that destroys the world as we know it.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 01:12 PM
15 hrs ago

Too many people believe the propaganda that gas is somehow clean and an important component of some imaginary energy transition.

OKIsItJustMe

(22,446 posts)
3. Natural gas will not destroy "the world as we know it." It's too late for that scenario.
Tue Jun 30, 2026, 01:49 PM
15 hrs ago

Last edited Tue Jun 30, 2026, 02:34 PM - Edit history (1)

“The world as we know it” has effectively already been destroyed.

Hansen, J. et al. Target Atmospheric CO₂: Where Should Humanity Aim? The Open Atmospheric Science Journal 2, (2008).
https://pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/2008/2008_Hansen_ha00410c.pdf

… If humanity wishes to preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed and to which life on Earth is adapted, paleoclimate evidence and ongoing climate change suggest that CO₂ will need to be reduced from its current 385 ppm to at most 350 ppm, but likely less than that. The largest uncertainty in the target arises from possible changes of non-CO₂ forcings. An initial 350 ppm CO₂ target may be achievable by phasing out coal use except where CO₂ is captured and adopting agricultural and forestry practices that sequester carbon. If the present overshoot of this target CO₂ is not brief, there is a possibility of seeding irreversible catastrophic effects.



Hansen, J. E. et al. Global warming in the pipeline. Oxford Open Climate Change 3, kgad008 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfclm/kgad008
Published: 02 November 2023

Abstract
Improved knowledge of glacial-to-interglacial global temperature change yields Charney (fast-feedback) equilibrium climate sensitivity 1.2 ± 0.3°C (2r) per W/m², which is 4.8°C ± 1.2°C for doubled CO₂. Consistent analysis of temperature over the full Cenozoic era—including ‘slow’ feedbacks by ice sheets and trace gases—supports this sensitivity and implies that CO₂ was 300–350 ppm in the Pliocene and about 450 ppm at transition to a nearly ice-free planet, exposing unrealistic lethargy of ice sheet models. Equilibrium global warming for today’s GHG amount is 10°C, which is reduced to 8°C by today’s human-made aerosols. Equilibrium warming is not ‘committed’ warming; rapid phaseout of GHG emissions would prevent most equilibrium warming from occurring. However, decline of aerosol emissions since 2010 should increase the 1970–2010 global warming rate of 0.18°C per decade to a post-2010 rate of at least 0.27°C per decade. Thus, under the present geopolitical approach to GHG emissions, global warming will exceed 1.5°C in the 2020s and 2°C before 2050. Impacts on people and nature will accelerate as global warming increases hydrologic (weather) extremes. The enormity of consequences demands a return to Holocene-level global temperature. Required actions include: (1) a global increasing price on GHG emissions accompanied by development of abundant, affordable, dispatchable clean energy, (2) East-West cooperation in a way that accommodates developing world needs, and (3) intervention with Earth’s radiation imbalance to phase down today’s massive human-made ‘geo-transformation’ of Earth’s climate. Current political crises present an opportunity for reset, especially if young people can grasp their situation.


https://www.climate.us/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Shell expects 65% rise in...