Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(64,871 posts)
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 07:52 AM Yesterday

Starbucks Flogs Its Plastic Cups As "Widely Recyclable", But Only 1-2% Of Polypropylene Is Actually Ever Recycled

Frappuccino lovers, rejoice: Your plastic to-go cups are now “widely recyclable.”That’s according to an announcement made in February by Starbucks, the waste hauler WM (formerly known as Waste Management), and three recycling groups called The Recycling Partnership, GreenBlue, and Closed Loop Partners. In a press release, they said that more than 60 percent of U.S. households can now recycle cold to-go cups in their curbside recycling bins. This makes the cups eligible for one of GreenBlue’s special labels featuring the familiar chasing arrows triangle and the words “widely recyclable. ”“To-go cups are entering a new era of recyclability,” the release said.

However, there’s a catch. Just because a product can be collected for recycling doesn’t mean it actually gets recycled. To imply otherwise is to conflate two very different numbers: the access rate and the real recycling rate. The former describes the number of people who are told they have “access” to a recycling program for a given product. The latter — the amount of plastic that is ultimately turned into new things — is what really matters, from an environmental standpoint. There’s not much evidence to suggest that the recycling rate for plastic cups is above 1 or 2 percent. “This is one of those situations where statistics can be very misleading,” said Alex Jordan, a plastics researcher at the University of Wisconsin-Stout. “They can pull a statistic that would make the public think that all these things are being recycled, but unfortunately even if you clean and dry and put your recycling in the recycling bin and it gets picked up, the overwhelming likelihood is that it ends up in a landfill or being burned for energy generation.”

EDIT

The manager of one recycling center in California, who asked not to be named, said the cup announcement represents little more than a convenient alignment of interests: It generates good press and revenue for GreenBlue, allows WM to collect more material, and casts Starbucks as eco-friendly without requiring it to move away from single-use plastic. “Everyone wants that warm, fuzzy recyclable label,” the manager said, adding that they suspected there would be no buyers for polypropylene even if they advertised it widely. “Our phone would not ring. It’s not something there are a lot of mills out there that are buying.”

February’s announcement is part of a yearslong effort to increase polypropylene collection and recycling. Helming the effort is The Recycling Partnership, or TRP, a nonprofit funded by plastic-producing companies and their lobbying groups, including the American Chemistry Council, Exxon Mobil, and Coca-Cola. It started in 2020, just two years after China stopped accepting the United States’ plastic waste. At the time, polypropylene had a bit of an image problem. It was the second most common type of plastic in Americans’ municipal solid waste, but its recycling rate was far below that of other resins, at just 0.6 percent. (Polypropylene “containers and packaging” had a slightly higher rate of 2.7 percent.) Because cities could no longer ship their mixed plastic waste to China for reprocessing and there weren’t enough domestic facilities to sell it to, many stopped accepting all but the simplest products: bottles and jugs made of PET or HDPE, labeled with the numbers 1 and 2, respectively.

EDIT

https://grist.org/regulation/why-your-widely-recyclable-starbucks-cup-is-still-headed-for-the-landfill/

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Starbucks Flogs Its Plastic Cups As "Widely Recyclable", But Only 1-2% Of Polypropylene Is Actually Ever Recycled (Original Post) hatrack Yesterday OP
We build new appliances that cost $3500 and last 8 years OC375 Yesterday #1
Yep it was part of the PR push for plastic use IbogaProject 22 hrs ago #2
As a recycler, it is NOT a profitable industry Envirogal 12 hrs ago #3

OC375

(921 posts)
1. We build new appliances that cost $3500 and last 8 years
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 08:16 AM
Yesterday

Of course we aren’t recycling. We merely have a profitable recycling industry. There’s a difference. Separating paper from dinner in the trash at home isn’t going to fix this BS. It’s feel good theater.

IbogaProject

(5,906 posts)
2. Yep it was part of the PR push for plastic use
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 09:34 AM
22 hrs ago

Recycling was just a PR move to normalize petroleum derived plastic products.

Envirogal

(318 posts)
3. As a recycler, it is NOT a profitable industry
Mon Mar 30, 2026, 07:41 PM
12 hrs ago

Recyclers have to collect and sort so much mixed material, which is costly in and of itself, but a high percentage of it is actually trash or “wish” cycling that people think or hope is recyclable. The plastics industry uses the promise of recycling to tamp down the negative PR they have. But most plastics are not recycled because the MARKETS for recycled content resins is volatile, heavily regulated (as it should be), and undercut by cheap fossil fuel virgin plastic raw material. The packaging producers, part of the gaslighting propaganda peddlers, only focus on slapping the recycling logo on their products, yet THEY DON’T TRULY SUPPORT RECYCLING BECAUSE THEY DON’T USE RECYCLED CONTENT in their manufacturing. We can collect and sort it, but someone has to buy it from us. That is what these gaslighters refuse to fix.

So they slap that logo on falsely which confuses the consumers who put it in their recycling cart, and then processors like us have to fish all the unrecyclable crap out and then pay to have it landfilled. And producers have the gall to blame us for low recycling rates!

That’s also not even including all of the single use plastics, and including the needles from the diabetes and Ozempic craze that public puts in their recycling cart that harm our workers and cost a ton to responsibly dispose of.

They are evil and don’t care about recycling—it’s just to avoid the PR scrutiny of litter and ocean harm as they continue to make UNRECYCLABLE packaging but tell you it’s “recycl-ABLE” that makes you confused and recyclers pay for it all. If it is not able to be recycled, it doesn’t matter where the logo says, we can’t recycle it. The packaging industry makes it not recyclable because they don’t care about the end of life responsibility. They keep the profit and spread the harm of managing it all out to cities, recyclers, and confused consumers.

RECYCLING PLASTICS RULE OF THUMB:
The recycling symbol with a number in the middle of it is merely a plastic resin identifier, not a green light for recyclability. (I know, that is part of the scam that the plastic industry created and where all the problems lie.)

The only plastics that have any market value and that we can recover in a mixed material recycling facility is number one or number two containers. Think sizable rigid items like bottles, jugs, tubs and jars. NO flimsy things like bags, wrappers, or tiny things like utensils, loose caps, or straws. Bags tangle, our equipment and tiny things slipped through are sorting operations. It’s all trash that we have to pay to landfill so when in doubt throw it out.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Starbucks Flogs Its Plast...