Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumBans on this landscaping tool continue to spread across the US. See where.
Fall is here, which means leaves are falling. But when it comes to cleaning up the leaves and clearing them away, more cities and states are banning gas-powered leaf blowers as the tool of choice.
More than 200 cities, counties and local jurisdictions and several states have either banned the use of gas-powered leaf blowers, passed restrictions on their use or provided incentives to consumers, landscapers and other companies to purchase electric equipment as a more eco-friendly alternative.
The issue continues to gain momentum. Just west of Washington, D.C., Arlington County, Virginia, is considering a year-round ban on gas-powered leaf blowers. In the New York State Legislature, a bill creating a rebate program for the purchase of electric lawn equipment passed the Senate with bipartisan support (11 Democrats, 22 Republicans voted yes), but time ran out in the session before it could pass in the Assembly. Proponents are working to convince New York Gov. Kathy Hochul to include the measure in her 2026 budget.
The pollution discharged by gas-powered leaf blowers can contribute to or cause health issues, including asthma and heart attacks, proponents said in a letter sent to Hochul on Sept. 10. "Its estimated that in 2020 alone, gas-powered lawn equipment in New York produced almost 1.4 million tons of climate pollution, the equivalent to the emissions from more than 300,000 cars annually," the letter reads, citing findings from the Environment America Research Policy Center.
Public officials and communities may initially oppose gas-powered leaf blowers due to the noise they make. "It's fall, leaves are falling from the trees and there's this incessant whirring of the (leaf blower) ... you're trying to keep your windows open and you can smell the gas (and) the smoke," said David Masur, executive director of PennEnvironment, a nonprofit environmental advocacy group, assisting proponents seeking rebates for electric lawn equipment purchases in New York and Pennsylvania.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2025/10/04/gas-powered-leaf-blowers-ban/86457674007/?tbref=hp
Yay! I hate them! Ours is a Ryobi battery powered thing and we only use it twice a year. We mulch our leaves into the lawn in spring, and we have a LOT of them---we live on 4.5 acres, and 3/5 of them are wooded.

bucolic_frolic
(52,715 posts)and let the ones in existing use die a natural death.
sop
(16,379 posts)Unless you have a very large property, there's no need for a gas-powered anything.
eppur_se_muova
(40,283 posts)
Don't see the point of a machine that converts non-renewable fossil fuels to noise pollution, particulates, and GHGs.
Grounds crews used to wear gloves to rake leaves to prevent blisters. That was sufficient equipment for the job. Now they haul out the leaf blowers and chase the leaves, scrap paper, and everything else around the grounds for the same amount of time they used to spend raking. Fall semester classes used to open the windows and let in fresh air. Now all the grounds crews have these noisemakers, which have killed an enjoyable practice. Meanwhile, the same oversized crews are chasing even isolated eaves still hanging on the plants -- anything to prevent mgmnt from getting the idea that with these "labor-saving devices" they shouldn't need so many people to do the same job, so they try to look busy. Possible the world's worst invention, ever. Ban them all.
OrangeJoe
(537 posts)I've watched city crews blow around CLOUDS of dust and leaves off the park and into the street where they sit until passing traffic sends them once again into the park. What is the point? I even stop my car and yell at people for using them (yeah I'm that grumpy old guy.) Rakes them into a pile, bag 'em and take them to the city compost or your own compost pile, or dump them in a wooded area or ravine.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(28,120 posts)It always seems to me that it would be much faster just to rake the leaves into piles and bag or burn.
Jilly_in_VA
(13,255 posts)Talk about pollution! Not to mention how many places have burn bans, whether permanent or seasonal.
NBachers
(18,945 posts)I'm glad to let go of the burning leaves. It's just not viable anymore.
fargone
(463 posts)Empty the bags of leaves. The city takes them to a composting site. In about 3 years it is ready. Residents can go and get compost for home use and the city uses a lot of it in parks. For me I usually bag the leaves with a lawn mower and transfer directly to my gardens. I don't think everybody burning leaves is a good idea. Lots of particulate pollution and risk of wildfires. Most cities don't allow it anyhow.
LittleGirl
(8,838 posts)I hate those blowers. There are so many cordless blowers, theres no need for gas ones.
defacto7
(14,147 posts)Those 2 stroke engines where you put the oil directly into the fuel burns the oil directly into the air. It's pollution at it's worst. I've been broiling under my breath for years about these noisy polluting monstrosities. Imagine how much healthier workers would be if they used rakes and brooms. Heart disease would be less, muscles stronger not to mention not having to breathe those shit fumes.
Cheezoholic
(3,357 posts)Or just compost the damn things. I have a different situation as I live in the country. I'll rake some for compost then the Fall winds take care of the rest. You can also rake them under your trees (I do that too because I HATE grass and let my yard grow naturally) and let them decay naturally over the winter. Thats part of how trees fertilize themselves. Plus raking by hand de-thatches and aerates your yard allowing the grass to crawl and thicken naturally in the Spring and it also disrupts pests. There's nothing, 0, beneficial to blowing leaves around a yard except making billionaires more money. If you can't do any of the above then rake the damn things. Your heart will thank you
Skittles
(167,990 posts)I fucking DESPISE leaf blowers - ALL OF THEM