Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

NNadir

(36,666 posts)
Sat Oct 4, 2025, 02:18 AM 3 hrs ago

Environmental Doublespeak Is Now So Common That One Doesn't Even Notice.

The paper to which I will refer is this one:

Ecological Impacts of Deep-Sea Mining Waste on Marine Algae and Copepod Tigriopus californicus Catherine Thomson, Alastair J. M. Lough, Jean Moorkens, Te Liu, Shelby A. Gunnells, Jessica N. Fitzsimmons, Zvi Steiner, Ann G. Dunlea, Clare Woulds, William B. Homoky, Mengjiao Wang, Qiao-Guo Tan, and Fengjie Liu Environmental Science & Technology 2025 59 (38), 20190-20200.

The paper is open access; anyone can read it in full. It states that some algae species are stimulated by mine waste, perhaps by increased access to physiological essential metals; copepods, by contrast are inhibited in growth.

That is not my point. My point has to do with the doublespeak in the opening paragraphs, which has now become so ordinary that one doesn't even notice it, sort of like reciting the Lord's Prayer in a church service, where the text is so stripped of meaning, inasmuch to obscure that it contains statements that are quite simply nonsensical.

The text in question, from the opening paragraph:

Metals such as copper (Cu), cobalt (Co), manganese (Mn), and nickel (Ni) play a crucial role in renewable energy technologies and the transition to a low-carbon economy. These metals are essential components in advanced batteries, solar panels, wind turbines, and other clean energy innovations that are key to reducing global reliance on fossil fuels. The accelerating transition toward green energy has yielded divergent projections for global critical metals demand, varying substantially based on assumptions of different transition pathways, including one scenario suggesting a doubling by 2060, (1) far surpassing current production levels from traditional terrestrial mining. However, land-based reserves are increasingly constrained by environmental concerns, geopolitical factors, and declining ore grades, driving interest in alternative sources. An alternative to terrestrial sources proposed by some is deep-sea mining, particularly in the Clarion–Clipperton zone, which holds over 21 billion metric tons of metal-rich deposits known as polymetallic nodules. (2) As deep-sea mining technologies advance, the Clarion–Clipperton zone and other abyssal plains are being explored as potential sources to meet the growing demand for these strategic metals and support the global transition to sustainable energy. (3) The International Seabed Authority (ISA) is responsible for regulating deep-sea mining in international waters under the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) and is currently still in the process of developing regulations. Some nongovernmental organizations and ISA member states are calling for a moratorium on deep-sea mining, often citing the limited amount of data available to assess impact as part of their rationale.


I have bolded the words which, on inspection, deserve being questioned given the relationship with one another.

How is that a form of energy that requires so much mining as to deplete terrestrial reserves is "renewable?"

How is that it is "green?"

Tearing up the ocean floor with heavy machinery, strip mining it - inevitably powered with fossil fuels despite all the nonsensical crap handed out by hydrogen and battery morons - then, after chemical processing with aggressive chemicals, (acids, caustics, and extractants) - and then dumping mine tailings at sea is decidedly not "green," nor is it "renewable."

This is a huge problem; even our language is polluted by this airhead nonsense.

If one really wants "green energy," the most important features would be energy to mass ratios, and of course, land and sea surface use.

Have a nice weekend.
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Environmental Doublespeak...