Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe dismantling of the Forest Service
In the 1880s, giant cattle companies turned thousands of cattle out to graze on the public domain i.e., the Western lands that had been stolen from Indigenous people and then opened up for white settlement. In remote southeastern Utah, this coincided with a wave of settlement by members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. The regions once-abundant grasslands and lush mountain slopes were soon reduced to denuded wastelands etched with deep flash-flood-prone gullies. Cattlemen fought, sometimes violently, over water and range.
The local citizenry grew sick and tired of it, sometimes literally: At one point, sheep feces contaminated the water supply of the town of Monticello and led to a typhoid outbreak that killed 11 people. Yet there was little they could do, since there were few rules on the public domain and fewer folks with the power to enforce them.
That changed in 1891, when Congress passed the Forest Reserve Act, which authorized the president to place some unregulated tracts under judicious control, thereby mildly restraining extractive activities in the name of conservation. In 1905, the Forest Service was created as a branch of the U.S. Agriculture Department to oversee these reserves, and Gifford Pinchot was chosen to lead it. And a year later, the citizens of southeastern Utah successfully petitioned the Theodore Roosevelt administration to establish forest reserves in the La Sal and Abajo Mountains.
Since then, the Forest Service has gone through various metamorphoses, shifting from stewarding and conserving forests for the future to supplying the growing nation with lumber to managing forests for multiple uses and then to the ecosystem management era, which began in the 1990s. Throughout all these shifts, however, it has largely stayed true to Pinchot and his desire to conserve forests and their resources for future generations.
But now, the Trump administration is eager to begin a new era for the agency and its public lands, with a distinctively un-Pinchot-esque structure and a mission that maximizes resource production and extraction while dismantling the administrative state and its role as environmental protector. Over the last nine months, the administration has issued executive orders calling for expanded timber production and rescinding the 2001 Roadless Rule, declared emergency situations that enable it to bypass regulations on nearly 60% of the publics forests, and proposed slashing the agencys operations budget by 34%.
https://www.hcn.org/articles/trump-looks-to-dismantle-the-forest-service/

2naSalit
(97,882 posts)I spent decades fighting to protect our public lands. The last federal agency I worked for was the USDA-Forest Service as a bear safety tech and Forest Protection Officer. Yes, I wore a uniform and a badge, carried a ticket book.
Once they start tearing up the forests en masse, the climate will shift in a bad way and in a hurry.
PufPuf23
(9,601 posts)Talent and accumulated organizational memory will decline.
The USFS has unfortunately long been a political windsock.
The western forests are at risk and change because of climate change.
Live on a National Forest where large fires have occurred the last 6 years.
Fire camps are developed larger than the local scattered villages.
Have been in evacuation warnings several times and evacuation mandates once, Summer 2023 had fire crews from all over the USA stationed at the base of my driveway.
The process appears to spend money to react rather than prepare as the fires are manned by outside and many contractors. Rare dwellings and other improvements are protected are protected. The fires are steered into Wilderness and Roadless Areas. There are Fire Safe Councils and some development of fuel breaks and the like but on a small level and mostly to protect improvements and make political points. Local USFS staff and the USFS research branch have already been greatly reduced from the past.
Was a USFS employee from 69 to 85 and highly educated in forest science but resigned during Reagan. Same as it ever was on difference on the ground. Too much politics and people talking at cross purposes.