Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe enshittification of solar (and how to stop it) -- Corey Doctorow with hat tips to Bill McKibben
https://pluralistic.net/2025/09/23/our-friend-the-electron/#to-every-man-his-castlehttps://billmckibben.com/books/here-comes-the-sun/
McKibben is one of our preeminent climate writers and activists, noteworthy for his informed and brilliant explanations of the technical limits and possibilities of various climate interventions, and for his lifelong organizing work.
Here Comes the Sun is a capstone on several years' worth of surprising, infuriating and inspiring newsletter articles, particularly about the unheralded, unanticipated, and unbelievable growth of solar. Everything else might be utterly fucked, but solar is going great.
In McKibben's telling, everything about solar is going better than anticipated. Solar efficiency is increasing exponentially with prices falling through the floor. The material bill for solar is also in freefall. Everything surrounding solar is going amazing, too. Battery capacity is improving even faster than solar generation, and the best new batteries use the incredibly abundant element sodium (not lithium) to store those useful electrons. Long-haul transmission lines are crisscrossing the world.
. . .
That's the good news. You probably know about the bad news: Donald Trump explicitly promised the fossil fuel industry legislation that he would kill renewables if they donated $1b to his campaign, which they did:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/05/09/trump-oil-industry-campaign-money/
He's doing his damnedest to make good on his promises, with incredibly wasteful, job-killing project cancellations:
https://stateline.org/2025/09/16/trump-has-crushed-offshore-wind-plans-but-states-havent-quite-given-up-hope/
But, as McKibben told David Sirota in a recent Lever Time podcast, reality has a stubborn pro-renewables bias:
https://podcastaddict.com/lever-time/episode/206986172
. . .

NNadir
(36,644 posts)That's because I have very low tolerance for so called "renewable energy," being represented as if had anything to do with preventing or even slowing the destruction of the planetary atmosphere.
It doesn't.
It was promoted to attack nuclear energy, a task at which it has had some success at a loss to all humanity now living and all future generations.
The expensive, and useless "renewable energy will save us" experiment has failed, which is unsurprising, since it was always a reactionary plan to return to the early nineteenth century when a smaller population relied on the weather for its energy supplies. It was abandoned for a reason back then, and should be abandoned now, since it clearly hasn't worked, isn't working and won't work, this at a cost of trillions upon trillions of dollars.
Bill McKibben is another in a long list of bourgeois airheads who think that nuclear energy - the only real viable tool for eliminating fossil fuels - is "too dangerous" but the destruction of the planetary atmosphere isn't "too dangerous."
Driving around in a Prius year after year to go to "renewable energy will save us" rallies is cute, maybe, but it's otherwise useless and clueless.
It is already too late for nuclear energy to save what might have been saved or to restore what might have been restored, a subject of some pernicious gloating in this space. That said, it remains, as it always was for the last 70 years the best tool we have to ban fossil fuels, best by far. It's not even close.
McKibben never came close to that realization from what I can tell. If, in fact he woke up, which I doubt, it's too little, too late.