Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumShitstain Wants To Offload MI National Parks Onto The State - w/o Budget, Staff Or Training To Make It Possible
LANSING A new report from Climate Power warns that President Donald Trumps vision for shrinking the national park system would stick Michigan with the bill and leave the states local communities, particularly those near park sites in Northern Michigan, paying the price. While Congress ultimately rejected a Trump-backed proposal to begin transferring national parks to individual states, advocates say the idea isnt going away. And if the Trump administration continues to push plans to downsize the National Park Service or abandon some parks altogether, Michigan would be among the hardest hit states, according to the new report.
All told, the report estimates that Trumps plans would shift more than $150 million in park maintenance and additional staffing costs onto Michigan taxpayers, while simultaneously raising visitor fees, slashing tourism revenue, and putting active military and veterans benefits at risk. It would mean fewer jobs, higher costs for states, and broken promises to veterans and seniors whove earned the right to enjoy our parks, Lori Lodes, executive director of Climate Power, said in a statement announcing the report this week. We have a responsibility to protect these lands for our children and grandchildrennot abandon them to budget cuts and neglect.
EDIT
According to the Climate Power report:
About $158 million in maintenance costs would be pushed onto Michigan if the state were forced to take over operations at its six federal park sites, including Isle Royale National Park and the Pictured Rocks and Sleeping Bear Dunes national lakeshores.
Entrance fees could spike. Sleeping Bear Dunes currently charges $25 per vehicle. To offset the loss of federal funding, that fee would need to increase to an estimated $65.
Michigan would need to hire at least 110 employees to match current staffing levels, all without the training programs or volunteer networks that currently support federal parks.
EDIT
https://gandernewsroom.com/2025/07/18/report-trumps-plan-to-offload-national-parks-would-cost-michigan-millions/

johnnyfins
(2,690 posts)Billionaires don't deserve their welfare? It has to be paid for somehow. Who really goes to these parks anyway?
Nigrum Cattus
(918 posts)and they are not anyone's parks, they are everyone's parks.
The future generations deserve that
wolfie001
(5,941 posts)Fat orange imbecile is total trash.
genxlib
(5,975 posts)I am surprised he isn't trying to sell them off altogether.
jfz9580m
(15,822 posts)Last edited Sun Aug 24, 2025, 08:37 AM - Edit history (1)
And (to me repellent) Yimby types like: Ezra Klein/Matt Yglesias/Freddie DeBoer/Casey Phillips/Leighton Woodhouse/Josh Barro etc would probably enthusiastically back that.
Not violating TOS with this I hope. I am only bashing people like Derek Thompson and Josh Barro who are trying to drive the centre even further rightward:
https://therevolvingdoorproject.org/the-abundance-mask-slips-at-welcomefest/
This is what Mark Cuban, Reid Hoffman etc want..a football batch between the GOP and a Democratic Party that turn into GOP-Lite.
hunter
(39,810 posts)The parks would be sold to developers.
Maybe not in California, but imagine Yosemite with golf courses, multiple luxury hotels, and an aerial tramway to the top of Half Dome.