Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,640 posts)
Sat Aug 16, 2025, 12:07 PM Aug 16

60 percent of the world's land area is in a precarious state

https://www.pik-potsdam.de/en/news/latest-news/60-percent-of-the-worlds-land-area-is-in-a-precarious-state
60 percent of the world’s land area is in a precarious state

15.08.2025 – A new study maps the planetary boundary of “functional biosphere integrity” in spatial detail and over centuries. It finds that 60 percent of global land areas are now already outside the locally defined safe zone, and 38 percent are even in the high-risk zone. The study was led by the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK) together with BOKU University in Vienna and published in the renowned journal One Earth.



Europe, Asia and North America particularly affected

Based on the global biosphere model LPJmL, which simulates water, carbon and nitrogen flows on a daily basis at a resolution of half a degree of longitude/latitude, the study provides a detailed inventory for each individual year since the 1600, based on changes in climate and human land use. The research team not only computed, mapped and compared the two indicators for functional integrity of the biosphere, but also evaluated them by conducting a mathematical comparison with other measures from the literature for which “critical thresholds” are known. This resulted in each area being assigned a status based on local tolerance limits of ecosystem change: Safe Operating Space, Zone of Increasing Risk or High Risk Zone.

The model calculation shows that worrying developments began as early as 1600 in the mid- latitudes. By 1900, the proportion of global land area where ecosystem changes went beyond the locally defined safe zone, or were even in the high-risk zone, was 37 and 14 percent respectively, compared to the 60 and 38 percent we see today. Industrialisation was beginning to take its toll; land use affected the state of the Earth system much earlier than climate warming. At present, this biosphere boundary has been transgressed on almost all land surface – primarily in Europe, Asia and North America – that underwent strong land cover conversion, mainly due to agriculture.

PIK Director Rockström: Impetus for international climate policy

“This first world map showing the overshoot of the boundary for functional integrity of the biosphere, depicting both human appropriation of biomass and ecological disruption, is a breakthrough from a scientific perspective, offering a better overall understanding of planetary boundaries,” says Johan Rockström, PIK Director and one of the co-authors of the study. “It also provides an important impetus for the further development of international climate policy. This is because it points to the link between biomass and natural carbon sinks, and how they can contribute to mitigating climate change. Governments must treat it as a single overarching issue: comprehensive biosphere protection together with strong climate action.”
Breaching planetary boundaries: Over half of global land area suffers critical losses in functional biosphere integrity
Stenzel, Fabian et al.
One Earth, Volume 8, Issue 8, 101393
DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2025.101393

Link to the world map: https://biointegrity.pik-potsdam.de/
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
60 percent of the world's land area is in a precarious state (Original Post) OKIsItJustMe Aug 16 OP
I remember a talk given by Col. Larry Wilkerson, markodochartaigh Aug 16 #1
I have come to think that part of the reason of T****'s talk about taking Greenland and maybe Canada is lattitude OKIsItJustMe Aug 16 #2
However, markodochartaigh Aug 16 #3
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems you're anticipating the glaciers melting in place. OKIsItJustMe Aug 16 #4
I would agree that markodochartaigh Aug 17 #5

markodochartaigh

(3,714 posts)
1. I remember a talk given by Col. Larry Wilkerson,
Sat Aug 16, 2025, 12:20 PM
Aug 16

Colin Powell's chief of staff, more than a decade ago where he said that a NASA climatologist told him that under a worst case scenario that by the year 2100 there would only be enough arable land on the planet for 400 million people.

OKIsItJustMe

(21,640 posts)
2. I have come to think that part of the reason of T****'s talk about taking Greenland and maybe Canada is lattitude
Sat Aug 16, 2025, 02:55 PM
Aug 16

Once the pesky glaciers are gone from Greenland, it will be a (relatively) nice place to live (making Erik the Red’s somewhat deceptive naming of “Greenland” more than just good PR.)

markodochartaigh

(3,714 posts)
3. However,
Sat Aug 16, 2025, 05:47 PM
Aug 16

only about 3% of anthropogenic climate change's excess heat goes into melting ice. And due to the latent heat of fusion of water, that ice is a huge heat sink. The Greenland ice cap is so thick (1-2 miles) that it will almost certainly take at least one thousand years to melt.

OKIsItJustMe

(21,640 posts)
4. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems you're anticipating the glaciers melting in place.
Sat Aug 16, 2025, 10:27 PM
Aug 16
https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/changing-greenland-ice-sheet/glacier-recession-around-the-greenland-ice-sheet/
Glacier recession around the Greenland Ice Sheet



From 1990 to 2000, the mass loss was 41 ± 17 Gt/year, and from 2000 to 2010 it was 187 ± 17 Gt/yr. From 2010 to 2018, it was losing 286 ± 20 Gt/yr (Mouginot et al., 2019). This means that there has been a six-fold increase in mass loss since the 1980s (Mouginot et al., 2019).

In total, since 1972, the Greenland Ice Sheet has contributed 13.7 ± 1.1 mm to global sea level rise. Half of this sea level contribution was in the period of 2010-2018.



What is causing these changes?

In Greenland, around half of the mass loss is now due to meltwater runoff during warm summers (Slater et al., 2021). Since the year 2000,increasing surface melt has accounted to a larger proportion of the ice sheet mass loss (Mouginot et al., 2019).

The remaining ice loss is due to increased calving of icebergs at the edges of the largest ice streams draining the ice sheet (like Jakoshavn Isbrae and Humboldt Glacier). This increased calving means that the amount of ice being lost from the ice sheet to the ocean is increasing, and ice flow is increasing (Howat et al., 2008). The increase in ice discharge at these outlet glaciers has been related to a warming of the subsurface waters around the ice sheet from the end of the 1990s onwards (Mouginot et al., 2021).


Glacier names in Greenland, from Polar Portal.




And Greenland doesn’t need to be ice free to be settled (as its current residents will attest.) Regardless, T**** won’t live to see it.

markodochartaigh

(3,714 posts)
5. I would agree that
Sun Aug 17, 2025, 01:58 AM
Aug 17

some limited settlement around the fringes would be possible, the small settled areas that exist today will grow.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»60 percent of the world's...