Last edited Sun Apr 17, 2016, 02:52 PM - Edit history (2)

Some people donate many times so they could be who BS means when talking about the $27 average, again flagged b/c of excessive amount over limits.

Before I post it in GDP, can some folks tell me the relative histories of Sanders an Hillary getting such letters? I'm guessing their more common than uncommon?

what is the point of that?

List is long

Bernie will be paying back his campaign a bunch of money.

and is indicted for embezzlement?

He won't be nominated. He may still be indicted. It's hard to believe his campaign is this sloppy; keeping track of donations and making sure they're legal is basic stuff. But now he can't claim ignorance...this is what...the second FEC letter?

about his junket to Rome.

His staff is amazingly incompetent.

His wife, 4 children and 4 grandchildren. He may be able to get away with Jane going along, but the pack of children? I'd be pissed if I had contributed hard-earned $$ and he blows it on a private jet for his family.

It's a cynical calculated risk. Sanders knows the FEC is a toothless tiger and the likelihood of significant penalties and fines is almost nil. Meanwhile it distorts the donation statistics and helps propagate the myth that he has no big money backers.

.....and at the same time most important aspect of running a campaign committee. When you reach $2700 STOP taking contributions from that person. Simple. If you do take more than $2700 it's blatantly obvious that you're doing a poor job of keeping track of your contributions and contributors.

And then we have all those millions of dollars of "unitemized" small contributions. If they're unitemized, how does the Treasurer know that one contributor hasn't given 200 small contributions that aggregate to more than the limit?

That octopus tentacle cartoon at the link is horrifically antisemitic--the Nazis were famous for using that kind of imagery.

Even if the subject of the article wasn't Jewish himself, the fact that the octopus seems to be reaching out from Israel is enough to make me gag.

270 pages:

http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/994/201604060300040994/201604060300040994.pdf



NO ONE ELSE SEEMS TO BE ON TOP OF THIS!!!

That writer is the only who seems to be on top of this situation.

Thanks for the heads up about the offending depiction!

Sorry, I didn't want to come off as brow-beating, but that kind of imagery just irks me. We don't need to be giving Sanders supporters ammunition.

No Nazis involved, I promise. 100% American greed portrayed.

http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/2001695241/

Licrary of Congress entry:

"Title: Next!
Creator(s): Keppler, Udo J., 1872-1956, artist
Date Created/Published: N.Y. : J. Ottmann Lith. Co., Puck Bldg., 1904 September 7.
Medium: 1 photomechanical print : offset, color.
Summary: Illustration shows a "Standard Oil" storage tank as an octopus with many tentacles wrapped around the steel, copper, and shipping industries, as well as a state house, the U.S. Capitol, and one tentacle reaching for the White House.
Reproduction Number: LC-DIG-ppmsca-25884 (digital file from original print in Case Y) LC-USZC4-435 (color film copy transparency) LC-USZ62-26205 (b&w film copy neg.) LC-USZCN4-122 (color film copy neg.)
Rights Advisory: No known restrictions on publication.
Call Number: Illus. in AP101.P7 1904 [General Collections] (Case Y) [P&P]
Repository: Library of Congress Prints and Photographs Division Washington, D.C. 20540 USA http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/pp.print"

I don't know enough on the subject!

That's embarrassing.

If you look at the letter you find many donating many times in a day! So perhaps this accounts for the $27 average!?

http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/994/201604060300040994/201604060300040994.pdf

It just makes it easier for donors to figure out how many seperate donations they can make before maxing the system. It's a system designed to confuse and distort statistics and fit a specific campaign narrative. It's a lie.

An individual may give a maximum of: $2,700 per election to a Federal candidate or the candidate's campaign committee. Notice that the limit applies separately to each election. Primaries, runoffs and general elections are considered separate elections. $5,000 per calendar year to a PAC.

He donated $15,900 to Bernie's campaign on February 29. (I chose that one date to add up because so many contributions were made by him on that one day.) And it's all in sub-legal, and random, amounts...there's a couple of $1 donations in there, some $27, a few low-four-figure entries...no single donation is illegal, but the total is definitely illegal.

It looks to me like Sanders is trying to have his cake and eat it too - to not "have a super PAC" and have his pure campaign be besmirched by that most evil of fundraising mechanisms, but to raise money for his campaign like a super PAC would.

There's also a chance - how good it is, I don't know - Jeremy is working as a cutout between the Sanders campaign and foreign nationals living in New York City. The one-dollar donations make no sense unless Jeremy was going down 34th Street harassing the food cart guys to donate to the Sanders campaign, and they gave him a buck to shut him up.

Never mind holding down a job...how does he have time to put food in his mouth?

There was also a table for what seemed foreign contributions, ONCE AGAIN!!

http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/994/201604060300040994/201604060300040994.pdf


RQ-2
FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20463
April 6, 2016
SUSAN JACKSON, TREASURER
BERNIE 2016
PO BOX 905
BURLINGTON, VT 05402

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: C00577130

REFERENCE: MARCH MONTHLY REPORT (02/01/2016 - 02/29/2016)

Dear Treasurer:
Response Due Date
05/11/2016
This letter is prompted by the Commission's preliminary review of the report referenced
above. This notice requests information essential to full public disclosure of your
federal election campaign finances. Failure to adequately respond by the response
date noted above could result in an audit or enforcement action. Additional
information is needed for the following 8 item(s):
1. The totals listed on Line(s) 21, 22, 23, 28(a), 28(d), and 30, Column B-P of
the Detailed Summary Page appear to be incorrect. Column B-P figures for the
Summary and Detailed Summary Pages should equal the sum of the Column
B-P figures on your previous report and the Column A-P figures on this report.
Please file an amendment to your report to correct the Column B-P
discrepancies for this report and all subsequent report(s) which may be affected
by this correction. Note that Column B-P should reflect only the election
cycle-to-date totals (11/7/12 through 11/8/16). (52 U.S.C. § 30104(b) (formerly
2 U.S.C. § 434(b)) and 11 CFR § 104.3)
2. Schedule A-P of your report discloses one or more contributions that appear
to exceed the limits set forth in the Act (see attached). The Commission notes
your additional explanation regarding the committee's corrective action taken
for some of these contributions.

An individual or a political committee other than an authorized committee or a
qualified multi-candidate committee may not make a contribution(s) to a
candidate for federal office in excess of $2,700 per election. An authorized
committee may not make a contribution(s) to a candidate for federal office in
excess of $2,000 per election. A qualified multi-candidate committee and all
affiliated committees may not make a contribution(s) to a candidate for federal
office in excess of $5,000 per election. The term "contribution" includes any
Image# 201604060300040995
BERNIE 2016
Page 2 of 6
gift, subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything of value
made by any person for the purpose of influencing any election for federal
office. (52 U.S.C. § 30116(a) and (f) (formerly 2 U.S.C. § 441a(a) and (f)); 11
CFR §§ 110.1(b), (e) and (k), and 102.13(c))

If any apparently excessive contribution in question was incompletely or
incorrectly disclosed, you must amend your original report with clarifying
information.

Please be reminded that all refunds, redesignations and reattributions must be
made within 60 days of receipt of the contribution. To date, one or more of the
apparent excessive contributions have not been refunded, redesignated, or
reattributed.

For reattributions, the funds can be retained if, within 60 days of receipt, the
excessive amount was properly reattributed to another person. An excessive
contribution is considered properly reattributed if (1) the contributors provide
the committee with written documentation, signed by each contributor,
authorizing a reattribution and indicating the amount of the contribution to be
attributed to each contributor; or (2) the committee reattributes by presumption
the excessive portion of the contribution if the contribution was made on a
written instrument from a joint account and was signed by only one of the
account holders. In this case, the treasurer must notify the contributors in
writing within 60 days of receiving the contribution that the committee intends
to reattribute the excessive portion and must give the contributor who signed
the check an opportunity to request a refund. (11 CFR § 110.1(k)(3)(ii)(B))

For redesignations, the funds can be retained if, within 60 days of receipt, the
excessive amount was properly designated for a different election. An
excessive contribution is considered properly redesignated if (1) the committee
obtains signed written documentation from the contributor(s) authorizing the
redesignation of the contribution for another election, provided that the new
designation does not exceed the limitations on contributions made with respect
to that election; or (2) the committee redesignates by presumption the excessive
portion of the contribution for another election, provided that the new
designation does not exceed the limitations on contributions made with respect
to that election. In this case, the treasurer must notify the contributor of the
redesignation in writing within 60 days of the treasurer's receipt of the
contribution. The notification must give the contributor an opportunity to
request a refund. (11 CFR § 110.1(b)(5)(ii)(B)) A contribution can only be
Image# 201604060300040996
BERNIE 2016
Page 3 of 6
redesignated to a previous election to the extent that the contribution does not
exceed the committee's net debts outstanding for that election. (11 CFR §
110.1(b)(3)(i))

If the foregoing conditions for reattributions or redesignations are not met
within 60 days of receipt, the excessive amount must be refunded. (11 CFR §
103.3(b)(1))

Please inform the Commission of your corrective action immediately in writing
and provide photocopies of any refund checks and/or letters reattributing or
redesignating the contributions in question. Refunds are reported on Line 28(a),
(b), or (c), as applicable, of the Detailed Summary Page and on a supporting
Schedule B-P of the report covering the period in which they are made.
Redesignations and reattributions are reported as memo entries on Schedule
A-P of the report covering the period in which the authorization for the
redesignation and/or reattribution is received. (11 CFR § 104.8(d)(2), (3) and
(4))

Although the Commission may take further legal action concerning the
acceptance of excessive contributions, your prompt action to refund or
redesignate and/or reattribute the excessive amount will be taken into
consideration.
3. Schedule A-P (see attached) discloses a contribution(s) from an individual(s)
who has a mailing address outside of the United States of America. Please be
advised that 52 U.S.C. § 30121(a) (formerly 2 U.S.C. § 441e(a)) and 11 CFR §
110.20 prohibit foreign nationals from making contributions in connection with
any election for political office or in connection with any primary election,
convention, or caucus held to select candidates for any political office.

If the apparently prohibited contribution(s) in question was incompletely or
incorrectly disclosed, you should amend your original report with clarifying
information.

If your committee follows the safe harbor guidelines outlined under 11 CFR §
110.20(a)(7) for all contributions received from a foreign address to ensure that
the sources of these contributions are not foreign nationals, please provide a
detailed description of your procedures. These procedures must be used in all
cases where a contributor or donor uses a foreign passport or passport number
for identification purposes, provides a foreign address, makes a contribution or
donation by means of a check or other written instrument drawn on a foreign
Image# 201604060300040997
BERNIE 2016
Page 4 of 6
bank or by wire transfer from a foreign bank, or resides abroad. A committee is
deemed to have conducted a reasonable inquiry into the contributor or donor's
nationality if you seek and obtain copies of current and valid U.S. passport
papers for U.S. citizens. No person may rely on this safe harbor if he or she has
actual knowledge that the source of the funds solicited, accepted, or received is
a foreign national.

If you have received a contribution from a foreign national, you must refund
the impermissible contribution to the donor in accordance with 11 CFR §
103.3(b). Please inform the Commission of your corrective action immediately
in writing and provide a photocopy of your check for the refund. In addition,
any refunds should be disclosed on Schedule B supporting Line 28(a) of the
report during which the transaction was made. Although the Commission may
take further legal action concerning the acceptance of a prohibited
contribution(s), prompt action on your part to refund or provide clarifying
information concerning these contributions will be taken into consideration.
4. Schedule B-P supporting Line 28(a) of your report discloses refunds to
individuals. It appears that your committee has not reported the receipt of the
original contributions, and has refunded an amount greater than the original
contributions for the attached contributors. Please clarify these refunds and
amend your report(s) as necessary. (52 U.S.C. § 30104(b) (formerly 2 U.S.C. §
434(b)) and 11 CFR § 104.3(a))
5. On Schedule B-P supporting Line 23 of your report, you have itemized
disbursements for which you have failed to include the address. Please amend
your report to include the missing information. (11 CFR § 104.3(b)(4))
6. Itemized disbursements must include a brief statement or description of why
each disbursement was made. Please amend Schedule B-P supporting Line 23
of your report to clarify the following description(s): "Staff Reimbursement."
For further guidance regarding acceptable purposes of disbursement, please
refer to 11 CFR 104.3(b)(4)(i)(A).

Additional clarification regarding inadequate purposes of disbursement
published in the Federal Register can be found at http://www.fec.gov/law/
policy/purposeofdisbursement/inadequate_purpose_list_3507.pdf.
7. Schedule B-P of your report discloses disbursements with the purpose "Per
Diem" that appear to be made from petty cash. Please be advised that cash
Image# 201604060300040998
BERNIE 2016
Page 5 of 6
disbursements to any person or vendor for any single purchase or transaction
may not exceed $100. If payments to the original vendor exceed $200 in an
election cycle, a memo entry including the name of the original vendor as well
as address, date, amount, and purpose of the original purchase must be
provided. Please amend your report to include the missing information or
provide clarifying information if memo items are not required. (52 U.S.C.
§30102(h)(2) (formerly 2 U.S.C. §432(h)(2)) and 11 CFR § 102.11)
8. Schedule B-P of your report discloses reimbursements to individuals for the
following travel related disbursement(s) described as: "Travel
Reimbursement". When the reimbursement amount to individuals for travel and
subsistence advances exceeds $500, the payments by staff to any one vendor
that make up the reimbursement may have to be itemized. For example, if the
related payments to any one vendor aggregate in excess of $200 for the election
cycle, the staff advance payment to the vendor must also be itemized in a memo
entry for that reimbursement. Each memo entry must include the complete
name and address of the original vendor, as well as the date, amount and
detailed purpose of the advance. If itemization is not necessary for a particular
reimbursement to staff in excess of $500, you must indicate so in an
amendment to this report. Please amend your report to include the missing or
clarifying information. See Advisory Opinion 1996-20 for additional
clarification. (11 CFR § 104.9)
Please note, you will not receive an additional notice from the Commission on this
matter. Adequate responses must be received by the Commission on or before the due
date noted above to be taken into consideration in determining whether audit action will
be initiated. Failure to comply with the provisions of the Act may also result in an
enforcement action against the committee. Any response submitted by your committee
will be placed on the public record and will be considered by the Commission prior to
taking enforcement action. Requests for extensions of time in which to respond will
not be considered.
Electronic filers must file amendments (to include statements, designations and reports)
in an electronic format and must submit an amended report in its entirety, rather than
just those portions of the report that are being amended. If you should have any
questions regarding this matter or wish to verify the adequacy of your response, please
contact me on our toll-free number (800) 424-9530 (at the prompt press 5 to reach the
Reports Analysis Division) or my local number (202) 694-1166.
Image# 201604060300040999
BERNIE 2016
Page 6 of 6
Sincerely,
Bradley Matheson
Sr. Campaign Finance & Reviewing Analyst
Reports Analysis Division
http://docquery.fec.gov/pdf/994/201604060300040994/201604060300040994.pdf

27 times.

More BS from the BS campaign

It looks like the BS donation strategy is like his online voting polls, after all. Anonymous and unaccountable people clickety-click-clicking Enter and pretending we all don't notice the irregularities.

Through 3/21, 1,257 individuals have contributed beyond the max allowed.

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/donordemcid.php?cycle=2016&id=N00000528

...hoping they can get away with some impermissible contributions?