Michigan
Related: About this forumMichigan Supreme Court spokesperson John Nevin... (EDIT... WE DID IT! FUCK YEAH!)
Link to tweet
That was 20 minutes ago.

demmiblue
(39,199 posts)Link to tweet
hlthe2b
(112,754 posts)
demmiblue
(39,199 posts)I'm so happy right now!
hlthe2b
(112,754 posts)demmiblue
(39,199 posts)Not yet seeing opinion on voting measure. Story to follow.
Link to tweet

demmiblue
(39,199 posts)Link to tweet
MuseRider
(35,115 posts)or "Atta women" your preference.
Somehow I cannot imagine this ending up any differently that it did here. I know a lot of people from Michigan and sadly most of them are Trumpers but I would guess at least half of them would vote to keep abortion in their state. I bet it is likely Michigan goes Pro Roe! Just a guess.
demmiblue
(39,199 posts)I am pretty confident that we will have our reproductive rights enshrined in our state constitution come November. This ballot proposal measure got a record breaking number of signatures. Also, women are pissed (and so are a lot of men)!
MuseRider
(35,115 posts)Go get 'em and be very proud. This momentum is so exciting. We will be keeping our organizations together.
Meadowoak
(6,605 posts)MuseRider
(35,115 posts)demmiblue
(39,199 posts)A proposal to amend the state constitution to establish new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make all decisions about pregnancy; allow state to prohibit abortion in some cases; and forbid prosecution of individuals exercising established right
This proposed constitutional amendment would:
- Establish new individual right to reproductive freedom, including right to make and carry out all decisions about pregnancy, such as prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, contraception, sterilization, abortion, miscarriage management, and infertility;
- Allow state to prohibit abortion after fetal viability unless needed to protect a patients life or physical or mental health;
- Forbid state discrimination in enforcement of this right; prohibit prosecution of an individual, or a person helping a pregnant individual, for exercising rights established by this amendment; and invalidate all state laws that conflict with this amendment.
Should this proposal be adopted?
[ ] YES
[ ] NO
PlanetBev
(4,396 posts)Go Michigan! Kick some Fascist ass in November!
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,588 posts)A bit of proofreading by some fourth-graders would have exposed the typographical weakness before producing the signature forms.
THERUNONWORDSINARTICLEONEWEREOBVIOUS. Fourth-graders would have laughed at them.
Anyway, now we have a good ballot that should draw many voters to the polls.
demmiblue
(39,199 posts)vimeo.com/745538798
Anywho...
JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,588 posts)It still should have been discovered by proof-reading. Article 1 could have been switched from all-caps to mixed-case and it would have been more legible.
Thanks for posting that.
And, GOTV!