Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(70,188 posts)
Fri Apr 17, 2026, 04:04 AM 16 hrs ago

NEW: Judge Leon reaffirms his order blocking ballroom construction.

Chris Geidner
‪@chrisgeidner.bsky.social‬

NEW: Judge Leon reaffirms his order blocking ballroom construction.

"Defendants now seek to tum this exception on its head and unreasonably insist that the entire ballroom project may proceed. Based on the record before me, I cannot possibly agree ...."

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645.72.0_4.pdf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES,
Plaintiff,
Civil Case No. 25-4316 (RJL)
V.
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
April 16 * 2026 [Dkt. #65, 71]
On March 31, 2026, I granted the motion of the National Trust for Historic Preservation in the United States ("National Trust') for a preliminary injunction to halt
construction of a ballroom on White House grounds as ultra vires. In recognition of the
national security and presidential security concerns raised by the ongoing construction
project, I excluded from the scope of the injunction "actions strictly necessary to ensure
the safety and security of the White House and its grounds, including the ballroom
construction site, and provide for the personal safety of the President and his staff."
Defendants now seek to turn this exception on its head and unreasonably insist that the
entire ballroom project may proceed. Based on the record before me, I cannot possibly
agree, but I will clarify the scope of the injunction as described below.
ALT
1:17 PM · Apr 16, 2026

NEW: Judge Leon reaffirms his order blocking ballroom construction.

"Defendants now seek to tum this exception on its head and unreasonably insist that the entire ballroom project may proceed. Based on the record before me, I cannot possibly agree ...."

storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2026-04-16T17:17:38.810Z


Reposted by Chris Geidner
https://bsky.app/profile/chrisgeidner.bsky.social

Chris Geidner
‪@chrisgeidner.bsky.social‬

Update: DOJ has already filed its notice of appeal.
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645/gov.uscourts.dcd.287645.74.0.pdf

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATION IN THE UNITED STATES,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 1:25-cv-04316-RJL
V.
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, et al.,
Defendants.
NOTICE OF APPEAL
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Defendants hereby appeal to the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit from this Court's Order entered at ECF No. 73.
ALT
3:27 PM · Apr 16, 2026

Update: DOJ has already filed its notice of appeal. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.us...

Chris Geidner (@chrisgeidner.bsky.social) 2026-04-16T19:27:44.319Z
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NEW: Judge Leon reaffirms his order blocking ballroom construction. (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves 16 hrs ago OP
Thanks so much for the update, I keep losing track... Rhiannon12866 13 hrs ago #1
Letting him build his damn bunker on "national security grounds" is a MASSIVE mistake. That's what he really wants, not Karasu 3 hrs ago #2
I'd say the opposite. maxsolomon 2 hrs ago #3
He does seem quite POed by the "no ballroom" order, so you have a point. I just hope that this is really all about his Karasu 1 hr ago #4

Karasu

(2,022 posts)
2. Letting him build his damn bunker on "national security grounds" is a MASSIVE mistake. That's what he really wants, not
Fri Apr 17, 2026, 04:22 PM
3 hrs ago

the ballroom. The full details of the military bunker aren’t even known to Congress.

This is his big gamble. He has no intention of leaving.

maxsolomon

(38,912 posts)
3. I'd say the opposite.
Fri Apr 17, 2026, 06:06 PM
2 hrs ago

He doesn't care about the bunker; he just wants to bathe in the adulation of sycophants in the ballroom before 2029 and leave a permanent mark on the WH. "The Trump Ballroom", "The Trump Arch", "The Trump Era", etc.

Monuments to himself.

Karasu

(2,022 posts)
4. He does seem quite POed by the "no ballroom" order, so you have a point. I just hope that this is really all about his
Fri Apr 17, 2026, 07:11 PM
1 hr ago

ego and nothing more.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»District of Columbia»NEW: Judge Leon reaffirms...