Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
District of Columbia
Related: About this forumIn Washington Crackdown, Making a Federal Case Out of Low-Level Arrests
In Washington Crackdown, Making a Federal Case Out of Low-Level Arrests
A single afternoon in court illustrated the new ways in which laws are being enforced after President Trumps takeover of the citys police.

Law enforcement officials searching a car after a traffic stop in Washington last week. President Donald Trump has cast his crackdown on crime as a success, and suggested on Friday that it was a blueprint he would seek to apply to other cities, including Chicago. Eric Lee for The New York Times
By Devlin Barrett
Reporting from Washington
Aug. 24, 2025
Updated 3:42 p.m. ET
As President Trump posed triumphantly for photos with police officers, government agents and members of the National Guard in Southeast Washington last week, lawyers across town in federal court grappled with his new brand of justice.
The stream of defendants who shuffled through a federal courtroom on Thursday afternoon illustrated the new ways in which laws are being enforced in the nations capital after the presidents takeover of the citys police. They were appearing before a magistrate judge on charges that would typically be handled at the local court level, if they were filed at all.
One man had been arrested over an open container of alcohol. Another had been charged with threatening the president after delivering a drunken outburst following his arrest on vandalism. And one defendants gun case so alarmed prosecutors that they intend to drop the case.
Mr. Trump has cast his crackdown on crime as a success, and suggested on Friday that it was a blueprint he would seek to apply to other cities, including Chicago. To defense lawyers and even some prosecutors, though, many of the cases that have landed in court have raised concerns that the takeover seems intended to artificially inflate its effect because government lawyers have been instructed to file the most serious federal charges, no matter how minor the incident.
{snip}
Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs and Alan Feuer contributed reporting.
Devlin Barrett covers the Justice Department and the F.B.I. for The Times.
A single afternoon in court illustrated the new ways in which laws are being enforced after President Trumps takeover of the citys police.

Law enforcement officials searching a car after a traffic stop in Washington last week. President Donald Trump has cast his crackdown on crime as a success, and suggested on Friday that it was a blueprint he would seek to apply to other cities, including Chicago. Eric Lee for The New York Times
By Devlin Barrett
Reporting from Washington
Aug. 24, 2025
Updated 3:42 p.m. ET
As President Trump posed triumphantly for photos with police officers, government agents and members of the National Guard in Southeast Washington last week, lawyers across town in federal court grappled with his new brand of justice.
The stream of defendants who shuffled through a federal courtroom on Thursday afternoon illustrated the new ways in which laws are being enforced in the nations capital after the presidents takeover of the citys police. They were appearing before a magistrate judge on charges that would typically be handled at the local court level, if they were filed at all.
One man had been arrested over an open container of alcohol. Another had been charged with threatening the president after delivering a drunken outburst following his arrest on vandalism. And one defendants gun case so alarmed prosecutors that they intend to drop the case.
Mr. Trump has cast his crackdown on crime as a success, and suggested on Friday that it was a blueprint he would seek to apply to other cities, including Chicago. To defense lawyers and even some prosecutors, though, many of the cases that have landed in court have raised concerns that the takeover seems intended to artificially inflate its effect because government lawyers have been instructed to file the most serious federal charges, no matter how minor the incident.
{snip}
Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs and Alan Feuer contributed reporting.
Devlin Barrett covers the Justice Department and the F.B.I. for The Times.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

In Washington Crackdown, Making a Federal Case Out of Low-Level Arrests (Original Post)
mahatmakanejeeves
Aug 24
OP
mahatmakanejeeves
(66,500 posts)1. Trump's D.C. Crime Crackdown Sends Minor Cases Federal
Trumps D.C. Crime Crackdown Sends Minor Cases Federal
By Syndicated Content
Aug 24, 2025 | 5:02 PM
President Donald Trumps federal takeover of policing in Washington has shifted routine offenses into federal court, where minor arrests are being prosecuted as serious crimes under U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirros directive to pursue maximum charges, The New York Times reported.
The shift was visible Thursday in U.S. District Court, where defendants normally handled in local court faced federal judges and prosecutors. Cases included an open container arrest, a contested gun charge, and threats against the president each reflecting the new mandate.
Mark Bigelow, 28, a part-time Amazon delivery driver, was arrested Tuesday after federal and local officers spotted an open container of alcohol in a van where he sat. According to court filings, Bigelow left the vehicle but was stopped by agents; a second alcoholic drink was later found. Prosecutors charged him with possession of an open container, a misdemeanor.
As he was placed in custody, Bigelow resisted, cursing agents and kicking two Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. He was then charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers, a felony punishable by up to eight years in prison. His defense attorney, Elizabeth Mullin, argued the case would never have been brought without the presidents directive: He was caught up in this federal occupation of D.C.
{snip}
By Syndicated Content
Aug 24, 2025 | 5:02 PM
President Donald Trumps federal takeover of policing in Washington has shifted routine offenses into federal court, where minor arrests are being prosecuted as serious crimes under U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirros directive to pursue maximum charges, The New York Times reported.
The shift was visible Thursday in U.S. District Court, where defendants normally handled in local court faced federal judges and prosecutors. Cases included an open container arrest, a contested gun charge, and threats against the president each reflecting the new mandate.
Mark Bigelow, 28, a part-time Amazon delivery driver, was arrested Tuesday after federal and local officers spotted an open container of alcohol in a van where he sat. According to court filings, Bigelow left the vehicle but was stopped by agents; a second alcoholic drink was later found. Prosecutors charged him with possession of an open container, a misdemeanor.
As he was placed in custody, Bigelow resisted, cursing agents and kicking two Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. He was then charged with assaulting, resisting, or impeding federal officers, a felony punishable by up to eight years in prison. His defense attorney, Elizabeth Mullin, argued the case would never have been brought without the presidents directive: He was caught up in this federal occupation of D.C.
{snip}
riversedge
(77,497 posts)2. Don't look sideways if walking down a street in DC or the National Guard-police will toss you in jail.
riversedge
(77,497 posts)3. ............The charges follow a directive by the U.S. attorney, Jeanine Pirro, to prosecutors to charge the most seriou
I do hope they catch Pirro walking down the street after she has had too much wine for lunch.
............The charges follow a directive by the U.S. attorney, Jeanine Pirro, to prosecutors to charge the most serious crimes possible in each case and to do so in federal court, where sentences tend to run much longer.
A federal public defender representing Mr. Bigelow, Elizabeth Mullin, told the U.S. magistrate judge, Moxila A. Upadhyaya, that he would never have been arrested, let alone charged with a federal felony, but for the presidents crackdown. He was caught up in this federal occupation of D.C., she said. This was a case created by federal law enforcement.