Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
The DU Lounge
Related: Culture Forums, Support ForumsIn the glow of the candle: Joseph Wright of Derby put science at the centre of his art.
Eclipsed in his lifetime, his work still burns with radical ideas
https://aeon.co/essays/joseph-wright-of-derby-put-science-at-the-centre-of-his-art

A Philosopher Giving that Lecture on the Orrery, in which a Lamp is Put in the Place of the Sun (1766) by Joseph Wright of Derby. Courtesy Derby Museums

In a dark library lit by a single lamp, four men, a young woman and three children crowd around a circular dais. They are staring at a clockwork contraption called an orrery, housed within giant bands of metal that suggest a celestial sphere. Below, tiny planets rotate around the Sun, orbited by pearl moons. Concentric plates allow the planets to move according to their relative speeds. The lecturer in his striking red gown is pointing to Jupiters moons, while a younger man in a purple coat and gold striped waistcoat assiduously takes notes. His notetaking implies the event isnt run-of-the-mill, but something special and worth recording. A small lamp has taken the place of the central sun in the orrery and throws light upon everyones faces. We can only see it as a reflection below the elbow of the silhouetted youth in the foreground a wick burning in a jar of oil. The lamplight adds an eager gleam to the eyes of the inquisitive young children and illuminates the contemplative gaze of the young man on the right. It highlights the edges of the young womans frilled bonnet and the cheekbones of the adolescent who leans over the edge of the orrery in front of us. It is his shoulder that we can look over without feeling as if we are intruding. The lamp illuminates all our faces as our minds are enlightened by the science we observe in action.
Today, A Philosopher Giving that Lecture on the Orrery, in which a Lamp is Put in the Place of the Sun (1766) by Joseph Wright of Derby (1734-97) is rightly considered a masterpiece. When it was first exhibited at the annual exhibition of the Society of Artists in Spring Gardens, London, in 1766, reviewers singled it out for particular praise, saying it was exceeding fine. It attracted more attention than any other work on display, inspiring one reviewer to break out in rhyming couplets: Without a rival let this Wright be known,/For this amazing province is his own. Wrights Orrery was a huge statement from a young and ambitious artist. So why, then, was he overlooked when the Royal Academy of Arts was founded by George III just two years later? When Wright had been lauded as a genius at that same years Society of Artists exhibition? Why was he not a founder member of the new august institution?
The Royal Academy was founded in December 1768 by George III at the behest of a small number of artists and architects. Membership was limited to 40, meaning more than 160 members of the Society of Artists did not make the cut. The Society had formed only eight years earlier, in 1760, as a way for Britains leading artists to meet, converse, study and exhibit together in London. Its hard to imagine but there were no regular public exhibitions of art before this time. Art was shown to discerning patrons in artists studios and viewed in private collections in aristocratic homes. The Society changed this and, for a shilling (around £5 today), anyone could scrutinise the finest paintings of the year. At its peak, it had more than 200 members, including the countrys leading landscape painter Richard Wilson, the grand manner portraitist Joshua Reynolds and the architect William Chambers, who would later design the Great Room of the Royal Academy. It also included younger artists such as the American painter Benjamin West and the history painter Nathaniel Dance, as well as Wright himself and his friends John Hamilton Mortimer and Ozias Humphry. These young men were finding their feet by exhibiting in this new annual mixed exhibition. Wright was 30 when he was elected a member of the Society in May 1765, the year his first candlelight painting, Three Persons Viewing the Gladiator by Candlelight (1765), was exhibited to favourable reviews. While he was known as a portraitist in his home town of Derby, where he lived and worked, it was his ambitious candlelight paintings that significantly raised his profile in the capital.

Three Persons Viewing the Gladiator by Candlelight (1765) by Joseph Wright. Courtesy Derby Museums
Wrights friends in London were young and opinionated artists, who were members of the Howdalian Society, but his circle in Derby was older and more scientific. John Whitehurst, a horologist and geologist, lived at 22 Iron Gate, a few doors away from Wright at number 28, while Peter Perez Burdett, a cartographer and son of an instrument maker, lived in Full Street. Burdett was so familiar with Wright that he often borrowed money from him (and never seemed to pay him back). Many of Whitehursts friends including the doctor Erasmus Darwin (grandfather of Charles Darwin) and the potter Josiah Wedgwood were associated with the Lunar Society, a group of industrialists and natural philosophers who met regularly in Birmingham.
snip

An Experiment on a Bird in the Air Pump (1768) by Joseph Wright. Courtesy Derby Museums

The Alchymist, in Search of the Philosophers Stone, Discovers Phosphorus (1771) by Joseph Wright. Courtesy Derby Museums
snip
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

In the glow of the candle: Joseph Wright of Derby put science at the centre of his art. (Original Post)
Celerity
Sep 20
OP
eppur_se_muova
(40,108 posts)1. Thanks ! Some of those are pretty well known -- I seem to recall Time-Life used them in their science books.
And check out the little (reversed) vignette on this cover:
some_of_us_are_sane
(2,137 posts)2. I'd never heard of this artist, but MAGNIFICENT!
The contrast of light and shadows, the drama of the pictures, the alchemy that seems to flow through these are fascinating.
THANK YOU, Celerity!