The DU Lounge

orangecrush

(26,819 posts) Thu Aug 14, 2025, 03:49 PM Aug 14

Sounds like an inefficient way to put out a fire (NSFW)

This was an actual ad, btw

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sounds like an inefficient way to put out a fire (NSFW) (Original Post) orangecrush Aug 14 OP

Five-alarm inappropriateness! True Dough Aug 14 #1

What ever do you mean? orangecrush Aug 14 #4

Someone needs a new ad agency. rsdsharp Aug 14 #2

You just know orangecrush Aug 14 #3

And there is no doubt in my mind that this was the work... 3catwoman3 Aug 14 #7

It may have been orangecrush Aug 14 #8

Eewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww! 3catwoman3 Aug 14 #5

Yup orangecrush Aug 14 #6

Nope Solly Mack Aug 14 #9

True Dough

(24,565 posts)

1. Five-alarm inappropriateness!

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:17 PM

Aug 14

orangecrush

(26,819 posts)

4. What ever do you mean?

Reply to True Dough (Reply #1)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:39 PM

Aug 14

rsdsharp

(11,356 posts)

2. Someone needs a new ad agency.

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:22 PM

Aug 14

orangecrush

(26,819 posts)

3. You just know

Reply to rsdsharp (Reply #2)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:39 PM

Aug 14

They guy who made this ad had bragging rights for life when he slipped this one past the editors

3catwoman3

(27,787 posts)

7. And there is no doubt in my mind that this was the work...

Reply to orangecrush (Reply #3)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 05:15 PM

Aug 14

...of a guy. None at all.

orangecrush

(26,819 posts)

8. It may have been

Reply to 3catwoman3 (Reply #7)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 05:22 PM

Aug 14

A completely innocent oversight?

3catwoman3

(27,787 posts)

5. Eewwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww!

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 04:53 PM

Aug 14

orangecrush

(26,819 posts)

6. Yup

Reply to 3catwoman3 (Reply #5)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 05:11 PM

Aug 14

Solly Mack

(95,777 posts)

9. Nope

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Thu Aug 14, 2025, 10:18 PM

Aug 14

Reply to this discussion