Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(80,854 posts)
Thu Apr 2, 2026, 10:08 AM Thursday

The Trump legal team is already appealing the ruling of Judge who halted construction of Ballroom!!.





Trump Ballroom Construction Plans Halted by Federal Judge

The Trump legal team is already appealing the ruling.

https://news.artnet.com/art-world/trump-ballroom-construction-plans-halted-2760737


Eileen Kinsella April 1, 2026


A federal judge in Washington, D.C., has approved an order halting President Donald Trump’s ongoing construction for a sweeping and highly controversial overhaul of the White House’s East Wing. This involves the construction an ambitious and expensive ballroom with overall budget projection of $400 million, which the President has said will be funded by private donors.


In his March 31 injunction following a lawsuit brought by the National Trust for Historic Preservation last December, Judge Richard J. Leon, U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia, wrote: “This case, in essence, is about whether the President has the authority to build a ballroom on White House grounds with private funds without seeking authorization from Congress.”

“The National Trust asserts that Defendants’ actions are ultra vires of statutory authority,” his a 35-page preliminary injunction order continued. “But why do Defendants even need statutory authority in the first place? The Constitution shows why.” (“Ultra vires” refers to a person or entity acting “beyond the powers of” what is allowed.)

The National Trust’s suit was re-filed in early March after the judge advised it to make certain amendments. It prompted pushback from the Trump administration and several related entities named as defendants in the complaint. These include the National Park Service and its director Jessica Bowron; John Stanwich, superintendent of the White House and the President’s Park; Douglas Burgum, secretary of the interior; Michael Rigas, acting administrator of general services in the current administration; and Trump himself...............................
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Trump legal team is already appealing the ruling of Judge who halted construction of Ballroom!!. (Original Post) riversedge Thursday OP
Loser Whip-poor-will Thursday #1
In different reporting on the injunction things were a bit different. Igel Thursday #2

Whip-poor-will

(257 posts)
1. Loser
Thu Apr 2, 2026, 10:16 AM
Thursday

Keep losing loser.

Ooooo another appeal of losing position .......can't wait for the epstein crimes trials.

Sexual predator near me just got 135 year sentence for 12 rapes including
two teenagers that weren't 13 .....Drip epstein drip

We need a class action suit ,after he leaves ,for him personally pay for restoration of OUR white house, loser.

Igel

(37,541 posts)
2. In different reporting on the injunction things were a bit different.
Thu Apr 2, 2026, 09:07 PM
Thursday

There was an injunction halting construction; with a 14-day stay because the judge assumed it would be immediately appealed.

That was the concise summary in some venues.

In other venues, the summary was "There was an injunction halting construction; with a 14-day stay because the judge assumed it would be immediately appealed." For people that only dwelt in those silos, the appeal must be an unexpected shock, even if the judge's order explicitly assumed it would happen--and when it's reported that in a couple of days that construction activity had not immediately halted there'll be cries of "violation of court order!" But the stay is a stay, and the stay was intended to let the crews and logistics continue should the appellate court stay the injunction longer term. As has happened not infrequently.

Latest Discussions»Editorials & Other Articles»The Trump legal team is a...