The trade war was never going to fix our deficit
The Supreme Court recently heard arguments in a case that will decide whether the president overstepped his authority by invoking an old war law to justify imposing tariffs on seemingly every country and product under the sun. Though White House lawyers changed their tune in front of the justices, up till this point, one of the administrations defenses throughout this trade war is that these tariffs are needed because they bring in substantial revenue for the country, money that could be used to help turn the tide on Social Securitys and Medicares fiscal outlooks.
But whether the administration actually believes this tariff revenue is incidental to their larger goal, the truth is these tariffs will not alter the trajectory of our national debt or entitlement programs. In many cases, it may make their outlook worse.
For the sake of the economy, SCOTUS should put an end to this abuse of power.
In their official brief to the Court, White House officials claimed that if the courts decide that the law in question, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), cant be used for unilaterally levying tariffs, the lost revenue would lead to financial ruin.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trade-war-never-going-fix-143000979.html
markodochartaigh
(4,739 posts)But if anyone actually did want to reduce the trade deficit, a good start would be to bring manufacturing jobs back to the US so we would import less and export more.
I wonder why I never hear deficit hawk Republicans mention that.
/$
slightlv
(7,164 posts)but they never follow up with any money to help create the infrastructure or support the businesses that could build up our manufacturing once again. They treat this just like they treat babies -- the "unborn" (whether ideas or babies) are so worth protecting and advocating for, but when it comes to actual support in the form of dollars, actions, and laws after the "birth" ... well, these same "supporters" are nowhere to be found. It's every man... and every business... for themselves.