Judge rules for The Washington Post in $3.8B defamation suit brought by Trump Media
Source: Washington Post
A federal judge on Thursday ruled in favor of The Washington Post, throwing out a $3.8 billion defamation lawsuit filed in 2023 by President Donald Trump’s social media company, Trump Media and Technology Group.
U.S. District Judge Thomas Barber, who is based in Tampa, wrote in a summary docket entry — known as a minute order — that Trump Media “failed to present evidence that would allow a jury to find by clear and convincing evidence” that The Post “published the allegedly defamatory statements with actual malice.” Barber granted The Post’s motion for summary judgment and denied one from Trump Media.
The judge said in his ruling Thursday that a full opinion is forthcoming.
Public figures who sue for defamation in U.S. courts generally must demonstrate that the defendants acted with actual malice — disseminating information they know is false, or acting with reckless disregard for the truth — under the standard set by the landmark 1964 Supreme Court case New York Times Co. v. Sullivan.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2026/07/07/judge-rules-washington-post-38b-defamation-suit-brought-by-trump-media/
Judge rules for The Washington Post in .8B defamation suit brought by Trump Media - The Washington Post share.google/GMISwpSgs14N...
— 💙🇺🇸DWally🇺🇸💙 (@dkwally.bsky.social) 2026-07-07T21:31:18.976Z
= new reply since forum marked as read
Link to tweet
Trump Media failed to present convincing evidence that the WP published the allegedly defamatory statements with actual malice.
