Evil stupid malignant

What can possibly go wrong

You can't change rules in secret and any company that uses the incompetence of this administration to cut corners on safety and process should be vilified and banned for the nuclear industry for all time.
What the hell are they thinking?!? This is NOT an "oh, my bad. Made a silly mistake. Here is my money for the fine" this is a "oh shit, I'm sorry, now half of Kansas is uninhabitable for the next 10,000 years" kind of mistake. You can't unring that bell.

... it is THE PEOPLE! And Trump, the oligarchs that own him, and the brain-dead sycophants that still support him, will be responsible for the deaths of thousands, if not millions, of Americans through their unbridled greed, and mindless obeisance to an unspeakably evil man-child psychotically obsessed with punishing any and all who didn't vote for him. For God's sake, he mentions states that he supposedly carried when addressing and audience of elementary school children! He can't help himself! That's how petty and mindlessly selfish he is. All of his minions and minders KNOW what a monster he is; they just don't care. They only have eyes for what they can get out of their association with him.
Undermining the safety of ANY industry, but ESPECIALLY the nuclear industry, is madness beyond imagining, and he revels in his fever dreams of how many innocent people will die because of him. He WANTS people to die! He gets off on it!
And, by the way, so does Putin. Don't EVER dismiss ol' Vlad and his evil influence.

He also gets off on being the source of gore and death.

...as they are with nuclear related exposures.

In the next hour about 800 people will die on this planet from air pollution.

I would be interested to learn, in the 69th year of commercial nuclear power operations in the United States, with reference to the primary scientific literature of a death toll from nuclear opeartions in this country that comes close to that rate.

I issue this challenge often here and I have yet to receive a satisfactory reply. In fact nuclear operations have a spectacular record of low environmental and health impact.

While I certainly support radiation safety, a subject on which my son's girlfriend is working for her Ph.D, I strongly object to selective attention.

There is overkill in reaction to the words "nuclear" and "radioactive." The absurdity of this attitude is to consider the coal, oil, and gas burned, killing people as these combustion facilities operated normally, to power computers to carry on about tritium releases at Fukushima.

Nuclear energy saves lives. This is a fact, because fossil fuel energy kills in vast numbers, on a scale of millions of people per year. Every nuclear plant operating on this planet displaces coal and gas, the emissions of which are destroying the planet at an accelerating rate.

Nuclear energy need not be risk free to be safer than everything else. It only needs to be safer than everything else.

If the orange pedophile's administration declares that orange juice is orange, that doesn't make it blue.

Score one for the planet, and next generation.

The most dangerous energy resource is natural gas, largely because people think it is "clean" ( or at least "better than coal" ) and because it is essential for the economic viability of their solar and wind powered follies.

As a society we've been very well trained to overlook the death and destruction caused by fossil fuels.

The. Cost of energy production from nuclear reactors will be much higher and where are the spent fuel going for 10,000 + years, that has been produced since 1960. Oh Thats right, There is no plan.

A Quick search on line
Solar PV Key Cost and Development Comparisons Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE):

Utility-scale solar PV is estimated at ($24 )/MWh, while nuclear remains one of the most expensive, often exceeding ($100)/MWh.

Capital Cost: Solar installation costs have plummeted by 90% since 2009, with utility-scale projects costing less than ($1,000) per kW. In contrast, nuclear construction costs are extremely high, often cited around ($6,500) to over ($12,000) per kW.

Construction Time: Solar farms can be built in months (e.g., 9-24 months), whereas nuclear plants frequently take 7 to 10+ years to complete.

Operational Costs: Nuclear has high maintenance, security, and waste disposal costs. Solar requires minimal maintenance and is projected to become even cheaper by 2050. 

Nations and states with aggressive renewable energy programs tend to have the most expensive electricity in the "developed" world and rarely reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to the extent it will matter in the long term; the exception being places with extensive hydroelectric resources which are environmentally destructive in their own way.

Disposing of nuclear waste is a solved problem. Disposing of fossil fuel waste is not.

It's always interesting to compare the carbon intensity of electric power generation in nuclear France to Germany or Denmark:

https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/DE/12mo/monthly

Welcome to DU.

In my youth I was a hard-core anti-nuclear activist. Now I'm not.

Renewable energy cannot support earth's current population of 8 billion humans. We've worked ourselves into a corner. If we continue to burn fossil fuels then billions of people will suffer and die. If we don't have reliable large scale energy sources then billions of people will suffer and die.

Nuclear power is the only energy resource capable of displacing fossil fuels entirely. Quitting fossil fuels is something we must do.

They are violating the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by failing to provide the public with an opportunity to comment on substantive changes, improperly using "interim" designations to bypass notice requirements.

I'm guessing that a brave whistleblower has brought this to media attention.

Thanks for citing the relevant act that is being directly violated.

Thus sprach Jared and them there that read.