Sending licence fee money to Mar-a-Lago not 'smart', shadow minister suggests after Trump threatened to sue BBC
Source: The Independent
Sunday 16 November 2025 11:36 EST
Sending BBC licence fee money over to Mar-a-Lago would not be a smart thing to do, the shadow home secretary has said after Donald Trump threatened to sue the corporation for up to $5bn. Chris Philp said he believed the president is the wronged party in his battle with BBC, but that he did not think that using licence fee money to settle the matter would be a good idea.
Mr Trump told reporters on Air Force One over the weekend that he would sue the corporation for anywhere between $1bn and $5bn probably sometime next week.
His comments followed an apology from the BBC on Thursday in which it said the Panorama edit of Mr Trumps Capitol speech on 6 January 2021 had given the mistaken impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action. The broadcaster apologised and said the splicing of the speech was an error of judgment but refused to pay financial compensation after the US presidents lawyers threatened to sue for $1bn in damages unless a retraction and apology were published.
Asked whether licence fee payers money should go towards the White House, Mr Philp told the BBCs Laura Kuenssberg: No, I dont think so. So look, we all work hard and pay our licence fee. I dont think sending some of it over to Mar-a-Lago would be a smart thing to do. The historic Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, is owned by Mr Trump.
Read more: https://www.the-independent.com/news/uk/politics/bbc-donald-trump-panorama-sue-b2866138.html
Am guessing that is the "official" Tory position.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,219 posts)It's not a political decision; it's up to the BBC, not the government, to decide how to respond if a lawsuit does materialise. And it's not even clear that "not smart to send money" means "fight any suit all the way" or "it'll be a downer if a suit happened and the BBC lost".