'We ain't ready.' Michelle Obama says the country doesn't want a woman president.
Source: USA Today
Nov. 15, 2025, 10:13 a.m. ET
Michelle Obama said Americans don't want a woman to be president, and that's why they shouldn't look to her to run for the nation's highest office.
"As we saw in this past election, sadly, we aint ready," Obama said. "Thats why Im like, dont even look at me about running, because you all are lying. Youre not ready for a woman. You are not."
The former first lady and wife of President Barack Obama made the comments Nov. 14 in a conversation with Tracee Ellis Ross at the Brooklyn Academy of Music promoting her new book, "The Look."
"So don't waste my time," she continued. "We got a lot of growing up to do, and there are still, sadly, a lot of men who feel like they cannot be led by a woman, and we saw it. I think we still have growing to do in that regard."
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/11/15/michelle-obama-woman-president-2028/87290750007/
Srkdqltr
(9,122 posts)We aren't ready.
maliaSmith
(117 posts)I worked for a federal agency for 44 years while experiencing the good old boy system and systemic sexism towards women and promotions (my own experience included), I think Michelle Obama is spot on. Many voters just can't accept that a woman could run the country as better or even better than a man and so it goes with federal agencies and businesses. It's sad. The only way to change this is for all women to stand up for their sisters.
popsdenver
(1,007 posts)she is absolutely correct, and as shown in the 2024 election, especially a black woman.....
If you want to have the most promise to win, sadly, you need to run a white male......
It's screwed up beyond belief, but she is just standing up to tell the truth of this matter.
It probably won't matter in future elections anyway, considering how they are screwing with the elections. By 2026, and most definitely, at this rate certainly by the 2028 elections, our elections will be like Russia's or any other dictator country.......
Akakoji
(450 posts)Thats how this is solved
delisen
(7,177 posts)Srkdqltr
(9,122 posts)Deuxcents
(24,780 posts)ShazzieB
(21,959 posts)I voted for Hiilary, i voted for Kamala, and I'd vote for a woman again in 2028, but that doesn't mean running a woman candidate on the Dem ticket would be a winning strategy. I doubt there's anyone who wants to see a woman potus more than I do, but Michelle is dead right: this dumb country just isn't ready to vote a woman in. I hate that like hell, but it is what it is. It sucks, but trying to pretend it's not true isn't going to get us anywhere.
Deuxcents
(24,780 posts)Were supposed to be the standard of the world and we cant even get healthcare, child care, education, etc fine tuned. A woman would change that and not just any woman, mind you!
Bluetus
(1,918 posts)That's mostly gaslighting -- that "American exceptionalism" bullshit is mostly propaganda pushed by the rich and powerful to make Americans feel like they are getting a good deal when a tiny number of plutocrats controls the majority of the nation's wealth.
Since the beginning, America has been dominated by oligarchs. There was plenty of corruption in that, but nothing like what Trump has brought us.
The US has done some great things -- inventing the transistor, mobilizing industry to defeat the Hitler regime, and some other things. But most people pushing that Exceptionism bullshit get away with that only because Americans travel so little. If we exclude the easy vacation spots (Cancun, Bahamas, Virgin Islands. etc.) the great majority of Americans have never traveled internationally. And that means they have never experienced widely available and reliable public transit, universal health care, worker's rights, liberal vacation policies, and a level of happiness far greater than in the US.
Contrast America of the 70s and 80s when we led the way solving acid rain and the ozone hole, and now we are the worst in the world at addressing climate change.
Deuxcents
(24,780 posts)democratsruletheday
(1,764 posts)and other Dems that basically said I was chauvinistic for pointing out the obvious. Harris was a WONDERFUL candidate and they chose that orange POS over her. Fucking idiots.
generalbetrayus
(1,384 posts)He lost to the man who ran against him.
wcmagumba
(5,154 posts)I wish people in this country were a little more mature...dang...
Bluetus
(1,918 posts)Black men got the vote in 1870. Women did not get the vote until 1920. What a country.
Every major western democracy has had at least one female head of state.
Like so many other problems, you can trace this directly to Christianity. Not Christianity, per se, because Jesus empowered women. But a very large faction of people in the cult side of American Christianity are strongly racist (white Jesus and all) and ultra misogynist. And not coincidentally, these people seem to be OK with their pastors, preachers, and priests screwing young girls and molesting young boys.
I hope I am not talking about a majority of Americans, but it is easily 40 million that fit that profile. In a country with elections coming down to a difference of under 100,000 votes, we just can't afford to give away so many votes on the basis of gender. It is disgusting and shameful, but Mrs. Obama is right.
I hope to live long enough to see our first female President, but not until after we have beaten the MAGA cancer.
montanacowboy
(6,632 posts)This is a critical turning point in our Democracy and we need to win big now for a while into the future. We cannot just win one cycle and then give it back to them. We need to win for a long time to cement our democratic values and not let them get their filthy hands on it. When that time comes we will be ready . But this is not the time.
walkingman
(10,109 posts)Gaugamela
(3,089 posts)woman will ever be president.
Having said that, I would happily vote for a progressive female candidate.
Bluetus
(1,918 posts)Russia has never had a female head of state.
Turkey has never had a female head of state.
China had one female head of state, but that was 1500 years ago.
Saudi Arabia has never had a female head of state.
Iran has never had a female head of state.
Iraq has never had a female head of state.
Libya has never had a female head of state.
Now that Japan has a female PM, I believe that leaves only four G20 countries to never have had a female leader: US, Russia, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia (5 if you count China). South Africa has never elected a woman leader, but had one serve in a temporary capacity twice. So much for American Exceptionalism. On this metric, we shouldn't be proud of being in this group.
sheshe2
(94,876 posts)phxjurist
(54 posts)but a man won't vote for a woman.
angrychair
(11,486 posts)That Democrats, especially here on DU, would say that the only people fit to run this country is old white men, is disappointing.
groundloop
(13,433 posts)In my most humble opinion that's totally different than claiming a woman isn't fit to run the country.
There are enough swing voters who can't get their heads out of their ass (and of course nearly all of the GQP) that we're stuck automatically eliminating half of our qualified candidates.
NH Ethylene
(31,258 posts)We are saying that a good chunk of our populace would not vote for a woman president. And therefore she would not win.
And I will say it: If a female candidate has a poor chance of winning, stick to a male candidate until we have our nation out of the clutches of crazy fanatics! Our best bet would be a white, heterosexual man, at least at the top of the ticket.
ShazzieB
(21,959 posts)And its definitely not what Michelle said! We are all just recognizing AND deploring that this country is too backward to elect a woman president.
As I said in my previous post, the situation sucks, but that's the reality, whether we like it or not.
twodogsbarking
(16,734 posts)mahina
(20,153 posts)It is a damn shame. Who knows if it wouldve gone differently after the majority of people who didnt vote decided differently. How to motivate those folks is the big question,
LiberalLovinLug
(14,538 posts)I remember Bernie Sanders getting the full treatment in here when he suggested to Warren, in a private conversation that was leaked, the same exact thing.
IronLionZion
(50,339 posts)It was against Trump rather than for a woman to be president.
Others may share that sentiment.
I was genuinely excited to have both of them as our party's nominees and hoped to make history.
Ellen Forradalom
(16,182 posts)HRC won the popular vote. What we need is to eliminate the Electoral College. Presidential elections turns on a tiny fraction of the electorate because of it
NH Ethylene
(31,258 posts)We need our own version of Project 2025 and eliminating the Electoral College should top the list.
BumRushDaShow
(163,320 posts)Blasphemer
(3,534 posts)The country is deeply sexist and misogynistic - no question but what it comes down to is that American voters will vote for a President who has marginalized identities if the country is f'ed up enough. In 2028, I think the Democratic party can run anyone and win.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(130,982 posts)Two qualified women defeated by an idiot because some men are scared little boys.
J_William_Ryan
(3,149 posts)Its more unwilling than unready.
CBHagman
(17,378 posts)We were ready in 2016, and Hillary Clinton did win the popular vote. The electoral college win for Trump came down to about 80,000 or fewer votes across a few swing states. All that's after decades of Republican efforts to cripple Hillary Clinton's career.
And in 2024, there was just a point and a half difference between Trump's percentage of the vote and that for Kamala Harris.
There's more I could say about the results described above, but in any event, the day is coming when we elect a woman president.
BigmanPigman
(54,374 posts)A black man "yes" a white woman "no". The USA sucks!!!!!
Lucky Luciano
(11,794 posts)and Michele is probably right .if, everything else being equal, Hillary or Kamala were men, they would have got the extra 2-3% to give them the win.
Jack Valentino
(4,030 posts)and already HAVE---
but too many others are not. However,
Hillary Clinton DID WIN the popular vote,
and Kamala Harris only lost by about 1.5 percent of the popular vote.....
I do believe it will happen before the end of this century,
with a strong female candidate---
once the Boomers/Jones and X Generations have "aged out"
of the electorate. I think it is quite possible by mid-century,
with the right candidate---
but sadly I cannot support another such female Democratic presidential candidate
for the forseeable future, just because the consequences of losing
have been shown to be---THIS that we are living right now!
(However, if a clear groundswell and likely 'wave' emerges
for any such female Democratic presidential candidate
before I expect it, I certainly won't stand in her way----
and I will ALWAYS support the Democratic presidential nominee!)
Politicub
(12,323 posts)vibes from this, like the first lady is issuing a challenge.