Senate approves bill to end the shutdown, sending it to the House
Source: AP
Updated 12:03 AM EST, November 11, 2025
WASHINGTON (AP) The Senate passed legislation Monday to reopen the government, bringing the longest shutdown in history closer to an end as a small group of Democrats ratified a deal with Republicans despite searing criticism from within their party.
The 41-day shutdown could last a few more days as members of the House, which has been on recess since mid-September, return to Washington to vote on the legislation. President Donald Trump has signaled support for the bill, saying Monday that were going to be opening up our country very quickly.
The final Senate vote, 60-40, broke a grueling stalemate that lasted more than six weeks as Democrats demanded that Republicans negotiate with them to extend health care tax credits that expire Jan. 1. The Republicans never did, and five moderate Democrats eventually switched their votes as federal food aid was delayed, airport delays worsened and hundreds of thousands of federal workers continued to go unpaid.
House Speaker Mike Johnson urged lawmakers to start returning to Washington right now given shutdown-related travel delays, but an official notice issued after the Senate vote said the earliest the House will vote is Wednesday afternoon.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/government-shutdown-update-80ef7cada7b3c0559aca38886efd8f90
progree
(12,548 posts)BumRushDaShow
(163,346 posts)Found this - https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/11/10/congress/senators-reject-pauls-hemp-plans-00646064
Senate voted down his amendment.
Grace Yarrow
11/10/2025, 8:19pm ET
Senators shot down an attempt by Sen. Rand Paul to eliminate language in their shutdown-ending deal that the Kentucky Republican argues will destroy the booming hemp industry. The amendment was blocked on a 76-24 vote with Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Paul as the lone GOP senators in favor of proceeding, along with 22 Democrats.
The vote comes after Pauls monthslong fight with senior appropriators Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and Rep. Andy Harris (R-Md.) over a provision that would crack down on intoxicating hemp products that were legalized through the 2018 farm bill. The amendments failure clears the path for lawmakers to vote on final passage of a funding package that moves Congress closer to ending the record-breaking government shutdown.
Paul told reporters that his amendment wasnt designed to hold things up, but to protect the hemp business thats blossomed in Kentucky since 2018. My goal is to condense the time, have one vote, express my displeasure with them screwing up an entire industry, and people will feel ... theres at least been somebody fighting, Paul said. The vote also marked the first time in years that senators were forced to take a public stance on how the government should regulate THC and hemp products.
McConnell championed the legalization of hemp production during negotiations over the 2018 farm bill. He has subsequently expressed privately that he views passing new language restricting the industry as key to preserving his agriculture policy legacy before he retires from the Senate in 2026.
(snip)
They never passed a 2023 Farm Bill and have been basically extending the 2018 one each year including on C.R.s.
progree
(12,548 posts)MichMan
(16,279 posts)Paul and all eight Democrats could have voted No and it still would have passed
progree
(12,548 posts)Here's what's in the Senate deal to end the government shutdown, CBS, 1025p CT 11/10/252
The vote was 60-40, with eight Democrats providing the votes needed. One Republican voted against it.
MichMan
(16,279 posts)There were multiple posts here about it.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220789339
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=20789039
The vote Monday just required 51 votes (50 with the tiebreaker)
progree
(12,548 posts)I didn't know that meant that any subsequent vote on the continuing resolution required only 50 votes. I'm still not sure about that, so I will continue to believe CBS's report.
ETA- AFTER the Sunday's vote, I also read that Rand Paul's opposition could slow things down in 1 articles, and in another article prevent passage, something that wouldn't be the case if only 50 votes were needed. . .
On the other hand, I don't know why two 60+ votes are needed . . . media reporting admittedly isn't always accurate and consistent
barbtries
(30,978 posts)because to my knowledge the House is not at home.
COL Mustard
(7,801 posts)With guaranteed back pay and RIF protection, but it sure seems like "screw the poor" who need the ACA subsidies.
Since the earliest the House could vote is tomorrow afternoon, presumably the earliest we can get called back to work is Thursday, maybe Friday. Personally I'm ready to get back.
in2herbs
(4,068 posts)for their confiscation and search of certain legislators phones. Was this addressed/removed or did the Ds consider this provision acceptable?
ananda
(33,991 posts)It makes me wonder: What aren't the Dems
willing to sacrifice?
moniss
(8,386 posts)aren't getting exposed either in the Senate or in the media. The right to sue over the Smith investigation is one that did come to light. I would imagine that if people dig deep enough we may find some goodies tucked in there that helped move the 8 Democratic Senators to cave in.