Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(163,346 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 06:07 PM Monday

Deal to reopen government slowed by Paul objection on hemp language

Source: The Hill

11/10/25 2:26 PM ET


Senate Republican and Democratic leaders say they need to resolve an objection from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) about a provision in the government funding deal before they can accelerate consideration of the bill to end the 41-day shutdown.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Monday morning there is only one “objector” to speeding up Senate consideration of the government funding package, referring to Paul, who wants to strip a provision from the package that would prevent the unregulated sale of intoxicating hemp-based products.

Paul said he’s just doing his job by standing up for Kentucky’s hemp industry. He argued he’s fully entitled under the Senate rules to use all the procedural time at his disposal to scrutinize the government funding package — which he opposes.

“Just to be clear: I am not delaying this bill. The timing is already fixed under Senate procedure. But there is extraneous language in this package that has nothing to do with reopening the government and would harm Kentucky’s hemp farmers and small businesses,” Paul said in a statement posted on the social platform X. “Standing up for Kentucky jobs is part of my job,” he wrote.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5598910-government-shutdown-rand-paul-hemp/



They are apparently trying to go with "unanimous consents" to leapfrog" over parts of the regular process, the steps of which are actually laid out in the article (and they are onerous). Paul is objecting to doing that (and "holding it hostage" ) until his demand is met (something that (D)s need to be doing).
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deal to reopen government slowed by Paul objection on hemp language (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Monday OP
Wouldn't you know that scum-slick.... lastlib Monday #1
But in this case, Paul is right Polybius Monday #3
So... Kick-Back and burn one while considering the pros and cons. BurnDoubt Monday #2
Paul: fuck health care but Kentucky's pot farms are sacrosanct. Gaugamela Monday #4
Well, that's not quite what the issue is. maxsolomon Tuesday #11
That's okay. The Dems probably have more who will agree to AllyCat Monday #5
It gets way worse! liberalgunwilltravel Monday #6
I thought Republicans wanted a clean resolution? ForgoTheConsequence Monday #7
Aqua Buddha strikes again! WestMichRad Monday #8
Always the weirdo. thought crime Tuesday #9
Does anyone on the Hill staff know that hemp is not intoxicating? travelingthrulife Tuesday #10
It's not an issue with "The Hill" BumRushDaShow Tuesday #12

lastlib

(27,135 posts)
1. Wouldn't you know that scum-slick....
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 06:13 PM
Monday

...would gum up the works....



(It isn't legal to hang repuglikans yet, is it?)

Polybius

(21,175 posts)
3. But in this case, Paul is right
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 07:25 PM
Monday

It's 2025, we should not be going unfairly against hemp.

maxsolomon

(37,820 posts)
11. Well, that's not quite what the issue is.
Tue Nov 11, 2025, 12:28 PM
Tuesday

The provision would kneecap legal, non-intoxicating hemp.

AFAIK, marijuana is not decriminalized in KY.

BumRushDaShow

(163,346 posts)
12. It's not an issue with "The Hill"
Tue Nov 11, 2025, 01:29 PM
Tuesday

Huff Post has an article that references the same and what prompted changes to the Ag appropriations for the extension of the Farm Bill portion of the C.R. (which is why Rand Paul attempted to strip what was basically "ban" language, from the Ag bill and that failed) - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/government-shutdown-hemp-ban-thc-drinks_n_69123d74e4b03f26059cf596?origin=home-zone-c-unit

I.e., the throwing out of the proverbial baby (hemp growing) with the bathwater (a broad and sweeping assertion that there are those out there producing SYNTHETIC ( "intoxicating" ) products derived from hemp and (quote) "selling them in gas station convenience stores", etc., was the issue.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Deal to reopen government...