Deal to reopen government slowed by Paul objection on hemp language
Source: The Hill
11/10/25 2:26 PM ET
Senate Republican and Democratic leaders say they need to resolve an objection from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) about a provision in the government funding deal before they can accelerate consideration of the bill to end the 41-day shutdown.
Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) told reporters Monday morning there is only one objector to speeding up Senate consideration of the government funding package, referring to Paul, who wants to strip a provision from the package that would prevent the unregulated sale of intoxicating hemp-based products.
Paul said hes just doing his job by standing up for Kentuckys hemp industry. He argued hes fully entitled under the Senate rules to use all the procedural time at his disposal to scrutinize the government funding package which he opposes.
Just to be clear: I am not delaying this bill. The timing is already fixed under Senate procedure. But there is extraneous language in this package that has nothing to do with reopening the government and would harm Kentuckys hemp farmers and small businesses, Paul said in a statement posted on the social platform X. Standing up for Kentucky jobs is part of my job, he wrote.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5598910-government-shutdown-rand-paul-hemp/
They are apparently trying to go with "unanimous consents" to leapfrog" over parts of the regular process, the steps of which are actually laid out in the article (and they are onerous). Paul is objecting to doing that (and "holding it hostage" ) until his demand is met (something that (D)s need to be doing).
lastlib
(27,135 posts)...would gum up the works....
(It isn't legal to hang repuglikans yet, is it?)
Polybius
(21,175 posts)It's 2025, we should not be going unfairly against hemp.
BurnDoubt
(1,244 posts)Gaugamela
(3,089 posts)maxsolomon
(37,820 posts)The provision would kneecap legal, non-intoxicating hemp.
AFAIK, marijuana is not decriminalized in KY.
AllyCat
(18,367 posts)Cave.
liberalgunwilltravel
(993 posts)Who agreed to this shit!
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/10/us/politics/senators-shutdown-smith-phone-searches.html
Unfricking believable.
ForgoTheConsequence
(5,136 posts)What does banning hemp have to do with the budget?
WestMichRad
(2,794 posts)thought crime
(1,007 posts)Weird Weasel.
travelingthrulife
(3,813 posts)BumRushDaShow
(163,346 posts)Huff Post has an article that references the same and what prompted changes to the Ag appropriations for the extension of the Farm Bill portion of the C.R. (which is why Rand Paul attempted to strip what was basically "ban" language, from the Ag bill and that failed) - https://www.huffpost.com/entry/government-shutdown-hemp-ban-thc-drinks_n_69123d74e4b03f26059cf596?origin=home-zone-c-unit
I.e., the throwing out of the proverbial baby (hemp growing) with the bathwater (a broad and sweeping assertion that there are those out there producing SYNTHETIC ( "intoxicating" ) products derived from hemp and (quote) "selling them in gas station convenience stores", etc., was the issue.