Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(163,346 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 09:45 AM Monday

Supreme Court rejects call to overturn its decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide

Source: AP

Updated 9:55 AM EST, November 10, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a call to overturn its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. The justices, without comment, turned away an appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the high court’s 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Davis had been trying to get the court to overturn a lower-court order for her to pay $360,000 in damages and attorney’s fees to a couple denied a marriage license. Her lawyers repeatedly invoked the words of Justice Clarence Thomas, who alone among the nine justices has called for erasing the same-sex marriage ruling.

Thomas was among four dissenting justices in 2015. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito are the other dissenters who are on the court today. Roberts has been silent on the subject since he wrote a dissenting opinion in the case. Alito has continued to criticize the decision, but he said recently he was not advocating that it be overturned.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who was not on the court in 2015, has said that there are times when the court should correct mistakes and overturn decisions, as it did in the 2022 case that ended a constitutional right to abortion. But Barrett has suggested recently that same-sex marriage might be in a different category than abortion because people have relied on the decision when they married and had children.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-same-sex-marriage-50eb4ad421911696e742d8c4fb4962fd



REFERENCES

https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143384965
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143484295
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143501822
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143510861
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143560573
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143561208

Article updated.

Original article -

Updated 9:33 AM EST, November 10, 2025


WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a call to overturn its landmark decision that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.

The justices turned away an appeal from Kim Davis, the former Kentucky court clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples after the high court's 2015 ruling in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Davis had been trying to get the court to overturn a lower-court order for her to pay $360,000 in damages and attorney's fees to a couple denied a marriage license. Her lawyers repeatedly invoked the words of Justice Clarence Thomas, who alone among the nine justices has called for erasing the same-sex marriage ruling.

Thomas was among four dissenting justices in 2015. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito are the other dissenters who are on the court today. Roberts has been silent on the subject since he wrote a dissenting opinion in the case. Alito has continued to criticize the decision, but he said recently he was not advocating that it be overturned.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court rejects call to overturn its decision legalizing same-sex marriage nationwide (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Monday OP
I guess the religious fundamentalists will just have to not go to gay weddings. Jacson6 Monday #1
Good. More cake for me. Seinan Sensei Monday #10
Finally some GREAT news. lostnfound Monday #2
Good news on this one important front Easterncedar Monday #3
Good news. milestogo Monday #4
Great news...Finally! sheshe2 Monday #5
SCOTUS actually making good decision? question everything Monday #6
More like deciding not to make a decision DFW Monday #21
I was so afraid. LittleGirl Monday #7
Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court denies review of Kim Davis' petition that sought to overturn Obergefell LetMyPeopleVote Monday #8
She has loved the attention she got over this Bayard Monday #11
Sad that this good news is so surprising. (nt) Paladin Monday #9
Good, now Davis can go back to Kentucky and find a few more cousins to marry FoxNewsSucks Monday #12
Ha ha! wolfie001 Monday #20
Good news today, but cannot be complacent IzzaNuDay Monday #13
Kim Davis will be back again. Repubs can't take no for an answer. ificandream Monday #16
Barrett is so fucking infuriating Stargleamer Monday #14
Glad to see Kim Davis get slapped in the face again. ificandream Monday #15
Good news! AZ-Elisabeth Monday #17
Anyone like kim davis should never have had the right to refuse marriage certificates to others, considering how many SWBTATTReg Monday #18
Ask Donny if he'll pay the fine Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Monday #19

lostnfound

(17,293 posts)
2. Finally some GREAT news.
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 09:50 AM
Monday

I’m so happy to hear this! My friends who are same-sex couples deserve to have the same rights and not have their families potentially destroyed. This one could have been very bad, if they’d decided to blow it apart, especially consequences for children of same-sex couples as well as people in a variety of other circumstances.

Easterncedar

(5,278 posts)
3. Good news on this one important front
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 10:00 AM
Monday

I needed this. That weirdly adulterous clown needs to FO into her fetid swamp now.

DFW

(59,363 posts)
21. More like deciding not to make a decision
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 04:06 PM
Monday

Which, in this case, is kind of a decision. Sort of a no news is good news situation. In this case, good enough.

LittleGirl

(8,906 posts)
7. I was so afraid.
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 11:50 AM
Monday

I have a mixed race marriage and gawd, if they had taken up this case, I feared they would also come for us.

Some good news for once. F* Kim Davis and that I even know her name.

LetMyPeopleVote

(172,659 posts)
8. Deadline Legal Blog-Supreme Court denies review of Kim Davis' petition that sought to overturn Obergefell
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 11:50 AM
Monday

Last edited Mon Nov 10, 2025, 12:54 PM - Edit history (1)

The county clerk who refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples had filed a long-shot petition to the justices.

Hallelujah!!!

Supreme Court denies review of Kim Davis’ petition that sought to overturn Obergefell www.msnbc.com/deadline-whi...

Stephen Trumbull (@smtrumbull.bsky.social) 2025-11-10T14:45:07.808Z

https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/supreme-court-kim-davis-petition-obergefell-same-sex-marriage-rcna242618

The Supreme Court declined to review Kim Davis’ petition asking the justices to overturn the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, which recognized same-sex marriage rights. The expected denial came on Monday via the court’s routine order list announcing the latest action on pending appeals.

It would have taken four justices to grant to review. No justices noted any dissent from the denial.

Davis is the former Kentucky county clerk who made headlines a decade ago for refusing to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples on religious grounds in the wake of the Obergefell decision.

Her failed petition sought to upend a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, which affirmed her loss in a civil case brought by David Moore and David Ermold, whose marriage license she refused. Successfully opposing Supreme Court review, Moore and Ermold wrote that Obergefell “was correctly decided, and there is no need to revisit it.

FoxNewsSucks

(11,454 posts)
12. Good, now Davis can go back to Kentucky and find a few more cousins to marry
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 12:34 PM
Monday

instead of sticking her nose in other peoples' business.

IzzaNuDay

(1,191 posts)
13. Good news today, but cannot be complacent
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 12:38 PM
Monday

I am glad SCOTUS rejected this case, but we still have to keep fighting — there will be someone else who wants to limit LGTBQ+ rights and wants their day with SCOTUS. Keep up the vigilance!

Stargleamer

(2,563 posts)
14. Barrett is so fucking infuriating
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 01:00 PM
Monday

“ Barrett has suggested recently that same-sex marriage might be in a different category than abortion because people have relied on the decision when they married and had children”. Women relied on Roe vs Wade to get needed abortions so their lives wouldn’t be derailed

AZ-Elisabeth

(2 posts)
17. Good news!
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 02:04 PM
Monday

Now with this pesky decision out of the way, maybe they can once again fully focus on making the lives of trans people more miserable & difficult? Go team! /s

SWBTATTReg

(25,865 posts)
18. Anyone like kim davis should never have had the right to refuse marriage certificates to others, considering how many
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 02:25 PM
Monday

times she's been married/divorced/married/divorced ... I think four times so far.

disgusting piece of you-know-what...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court rejects cal...