nt

Eternal shame and infamy beckons, greedy Republican runts.

Looking forward to them getting what they deserve...

… of how “the whole thing is imploding.”

Just saying… it helps to include content that supports the headline.

Comments from people inside The Heritage Foundation certainly support the headline, as do remarks from outside observers. It looks like Roberts's support for a piece of shit like Carlson, and his apparent affection for Nick Fuentes, will be Kevin Roberts's downfall. Couldn't happen to a nicer soulless psychopath. Same goes for anyone even tangentially associated with that obscenely treacherous crowd.

I will not click on any link that takes me there. It is a junk site and full of ads that interfere with my laptop's loading abilities even with AdBlock extension. It is not original reporting, either.

So it is helpful to be able to read the paragraph(s) that supports the headline.

1.) They will report on another outlet's reporting - and often sites that are PAYWALLED that non-subscribers will NOT have access to, but they will usually either link to those articles directly (at the bottom of their article) or will link to it in their content if someone wants to see the original source.

2.) They have their OWN staff who will actually monitor the broadcast and social media news/politics feeds and will summarize them. So if CNN has a guest on a political show, they will have someone watch that interview/interaction and will summarize it (without the formality of a complete "transcript", like places such as CBS does with "Face the Nation" ), often with certain quotes of interest being focused on in their excerpts).

3.) They will have "guest writers" from various news/political blog sites, actually write/contribute an article about what is going on in the news and politics, and in some cases, the articles are coming from local broadcast/print sites and the authors are credited.

4.) They will often summarize articles from news sources that were carefully buried (not really highlighted on those sites' main pages) that end up PAST the LBN 12-hour cutoff, so they can't be posted here, but Raw Story will do a report on what those articles were describing and will do so within the 12-hour time frame, so they can at least be posted in LBN.

So as an example for me personally, I have subscriptions to a big pile of news/politics sites/magazines/newspapers, etc. But I don't sub to the WSJ. But Raw Story will often summarize articles from them. If there are fireworks going on during some Faux Snooze program (and I sure as hell won't link to them), THEY will summarize what happened during that "Republicans in Disarray" moment that needs to be put out there "in public" since the M$M does so much sanitizing of GOP fumbles.

Personally, I don’t think it should be an allowable source for LBN. GD, sure. Same with a few other sources, like Mediaite.

“Former colleagues recalled to The Guardian that Kevin Roberts, the president of the Heritage Foundation, told them that he had killed his neighbor’s pit bull around 2004 because the dog’s barking was bothering his family. Roberts, now the architect of the right-wing blueprint for a second Trump presidency, was an assistant professor of history at New Mexico State University from 2003 to 2005.

Kenneth Hammond, the history department chair at the time, told the outlet: “My recollection of his account was that he was discussing in the hallway with various members of the faculty, including me, that a neighbor’s dog had been barking pretty relentlessly and was, you know, keeping the baby and probably the parents awake and that he kind of lost it and took a shovel and killed the dog. End of problem.”

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/project-2025-kevin-roberts-dog-b2618094.html

That happens to be the case sometimes when I’m busy. Instead I read four paragraphs that didn’t inform me of much of anything.

Guess I need to be more careful about which threads I click.

Why is this political organization exempt from taxes?

demanding they NOT be exempt from taxes. Can't recall the rest

I've never really understood what a "think-tank" actually is.

Supposedly people go to work there, right? What do they do all day?

how shitty they can be to everyone not 'conservative white christian'

the MAGA/Fascist movement.

The M$M is a gigantic failure....