Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(163,346 posts)
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 07:31 AM Nov 7

California Supreme Court rejects free speech challenge to LGBT protections in nursing homes

Source: msn/CalMatters

12h


The California Supreme Court rejected a First Amendment challenge to a state law that protects the rights of gay and transgender people in nursing homes and forbids employees of those sites from using the wrong pronouns to address a resident or coworker. The ruling, handed down today, holds that violations of the LGBT Long-Term Care Residents’ Bill of Rights are not protected by the First Amendment because they relate to codes of conduct in what is effectively both a workplace and a home.

“The pronouns provision constitutes a regulation of discriminatory conduct that incidentally affects speech,” the court ruled. The opinion reversed an appeals court ruling that held provisions in the 2017 law relating to patient pronouns and names could impede an employee’s freedom of speech. Five justices signed onto the main opinion; two signed onto a concurrence. There were no dissents.

“All individuals deserve to live free from harmful, disrespectful rhetoric that attacks their sense of self, especially when receiving care necessary for their continued well-being,” Attorney General Rob Bonta said in a written statement commending the ruling. “State law prohibits discrimination and harassment in the workplace. I am glad that the California Supreme Court agrees with us on the importance of these protections and has affirmed their constitutionality.”

The group challenging the law, Taking Offense, asserted in its lawsuit that the provision mandating long-term care facilities use people’s chosen pronouns amounts to “criminalizing and compelling speech content.”

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/california-supreme-court-rejects-free-speech-challenge-to-lgbt-protections-in-nursing-homes/ar-AA1PXkQl

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
California Supreme Court rejects free speech challenge to LGBT protections in nursing homes (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Nov 7 OP
Respect ZDU Nov 7 #1
RW snowflakes always looking for ways to let out their hatred wolfie001 Nov 7 #2
California SC showing the nation how it's done. MarineCombatEngineer Nov 7 #3
++++ riversedge Nov 7 #5
Freedom of speech only applies to government suppression of speech. intheflow Nov 7 #4
1st Amendment says you can't be prevented from saying anything. It does NOT protect you from the consequences ... eppur_se_muova Nov 8 #6

wolfie001

(6,524 posts)
2. RW snowflakes always looking for ways to let out their hatred
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 09:01 AM
Nov 7

Every one of 'em can go EFF the hell off.

intheflow

(29,876 posts)
4. Freedom of speech only applies to government suppression of speech.
Fri Nov 7, 2025, 12:33 PM
Nov 7

Private business can set any rule they want. You don't want to respect residents' wishes and rights? You're welcome to find employment elsewhere.

eppur_se_muova

(40,544 posts)
6. 1st Amendment says you can't be prevented from saying anything. It does NOT protect you from the consequences ...
Sat Nov 8, 2025, 01:36 PM
Nov 8

... of what you say. If you are using your free speech to spread hatred and intolerance, expect to pay for it, by social ostracism at the very least. If it violates your employment contract, expect to be fired -- your employer will have had enough lawyers work on that contract to make it bulletproof.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California Supreme Court ...